Effectiveness of 20 years of conservation investments in protecting orangutans

dc.contributor.authorSantika, Truly
dc.contributor.authorSherman, Julie
dc.contributor.authorVoigt, Maria
dc.contributor.authorAncrenaz, Marc
dc.contributor.authorWich, Serge A.
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Kerrie A.
dc.contributor.authorPossingham, Hugh
dc.contributor.authorMassingham, Emily
dc.contributor.authorAshbury, Alison M.
dc.contributor.authorMeijaard, Erik
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-09T07:58:12Z
dc.date.available2022-06-09T07:58:12Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-25eng
dc.description.abstractConservation strategies are rarely systematically evaluated, which reduces transparency, hinders the cost-effective deployment of resources, and hides what works best in different contexts. Using data on the iconic and critically endangered orangutan (Pongo spp.), we developed a novel spatiotemporal framework for evaluating conservation investments. We show that around USD 1 billion was invested between 2000 and 2019 into orangutan conservation by governments, nongovernmental organizations, companies, and communities. Broken down by allocation to different conservation strategies, we find that habitat protection, patrolling, and public outreach had the greatest return on investment for maintaining orangutan populations. Given the variability in threats, land-use opportunity costs, and baseline remunerations in different regions, there were differential benefits per dollar invested across conservation activities and regions. We show that although challenging from a data and analysis perspective, it is possible to fully understand the relationships between conservation investments and outcomes and the external factors that influence these outcomes. Such analyses can provide improved guidance toward a more effective biodiversity conservation. Insights into the spatiotemporal interplays between the costs and benefits driving effectiveness can inform decisions about the most suitable orangutan conservation strategies for halting population declines. Although our study focuses on the three extant orangutan species of Sumatra and Borneo, our findings have broad application for evidence-based conservation science and practice worldwide.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedeng
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.051eng
dc.identifier.pmid35276097eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/57752
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.subjectbiodiversity, conservation finance, evidence-based conservation, great apes, impact assessment, Indonesia, Malaysia, orangutan, Pongo, tropical foresteng
dc.subject.ddc570eng
dc.titleEffectiveness of 20 years of conservation investments in protecting orangutanseng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEeng
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Santika2022-04-25Effec-57752,
  year={2022},
  doi={10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.051},
  title={Effectiveness of 20 years of conservation investments in protecting orangutans},
  number={8},
  volume={32},
  issn={0960-9822},
  journal={Current Biology},
  pages={1754--1763.e6},
  author={Santika, Truly and Sherman, Julie and Voigt, Maria and Ancrenaz, Marc and Wich, Serge A. and Wilson, Kerrie A. and Possingham, Hugh and Massingham, Emily and Ashbury, Alison M. and Meijaard, Erik}
}
kops.citation.iso690SANTIKA, Truly, Julie SHERMAN, Maria VOIGT, Marc ANCRENAZ, Serge A. WICH, Kerrie A. WILSON, Hugh POSSINGHAM, Emily MASSINGHAM, Alison M. ASHBURY, Erik MEIJAARD, 2022. Effectiveness of 20 years of conservation investments in protecting orangutans. In: Current Biology. Cell Press. 2022, 32(8), pp. 1754-1763.e6. ISSN 0960-9822. eISSN 1879-0445. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.051deu
kops.citation.iso690SANTIKA, Truly, Julie SHERMAN, Maria VOIGT, Marc ANCRENAZ, Serge A. WICH, Kerrie A. WILSON, Hugh POSSINGHAM, Emily MASSINGHAM, Alison M. ASHBURY, Erik MEIJAARD, 2022. Effectiveness of 20 years of conservation investments in protecting orangutans. In: Current Biology. Cell Press. 2022, 32(8), pp. 1754-1763.e6. ISSN 0960-9822. eISSN 1879-0445. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.051eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/57752">
    <dc:contributor>Meijaard, Erik</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Sherman, Julie</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Sherman, Julie</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-06-09T07:58:12Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Voigt, Maria</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Possingham, Hugh</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Ashbury, Alison M.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Ashbury, Alison M.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Voigt, Maria</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Santika, Truly</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>Effectiveness of 20 years of conservation investments in protecting orangutans</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Wich, Serge A.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Wilson, Kerrie A.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Wich, Serge A.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-06-09T07:58:12Z</dc:date>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:contributor>Massingham, Emily</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Wilson, Kerrie A.</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Ancrenaz, Marc</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Meijaard, Erik</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Possingham, Hugh</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/57752"/>
    <dc:creator>Massingham, Emily</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ancrenaz, Marc</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2022-04-25</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Santika, Truly</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Conservation strategies are rarely systematically evaluated, which reduces transparency, hinders the cost-effective deployment of resources, and hides what works best in different contexts. Using data on the iconic and critically endangered orangutan (Pongo spp.), we developed a novel spatiotemporal framework for evaluating conservation investments. We show that around USD 1 billion was invested between 2000 and 2019 into orangutan conservation by governments, nongovernmental organizations, companies, and communities. Broken down by allocation to different conservation strategies, we find that habitat protection, patrolling, and public outreach had the greatest return on investment for maintaining orangutan populations. Given the variability in threats, land-use opportunity costs, and baseline remunerations in different regions, there were differential benefits per dollar invested across conservation activities and regions. We show that although challenging from a data and analysis perspective, it is possible to fully understand the relationships between conservation investments and outcomes and the external factors that influence these outcomes. Such analyses can provide improved guidance toward a more effective biodiversity conservation. Insights into the spatiotemporal interplays between the costs and benefits driving effectiveness can inform decisions about the most suitable orangutan conservation strategies for halting population declines. Although our study focuses on the three extant orangutan species of Sumatra and Borneo, our findings have broad application for evidence-based conservation science and practice worldwide.</dcterms:abstract>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.flag.etalAuthortrueeng
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedtrueeng
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.sourcefieldCurrent Biology. Cell Press. 2022, <b>32</b>(8), pp. 1754-1763.e6. ISSN 0960-9822. eISSN 1879-0445. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.051deu
kops.sourcefield.plainCurrent Biology. Cell Press. 2022, 32(8), pp. 1754-1763.e6. ISSN 0960-9822. eISSN 1879-0445. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.051deu
kops.sourcefield.plainCurrent Biology. Cell Press. 2022, 32(8), pp. 1754-1763.e6. ISSN 0960-9822. eISSN 1879-0445. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.02.051eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione514195c-cce5-4c82-bd23-5b9c53969b03
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye514195c-cce5-4c82-bd23-5b9c53969b03
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage1754eng
source.bibliographicInfo.issue8eng
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage1763.e6eng
source.bibliographicInfo.volume32eng
source.identifier.eissn1879-0445eng
source.identifier.issn0960-9822eng
source.periodicalTitleCurrent Biologyeng
source.publisherCell Presseng

Dateien