Publikation:

Analysing multitrait–multimethod data with structural equation models for ordinal variables applying the WLSMV estimator : What sample size is needed for valid results?

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Nussbeck_2-cssjfgu5kh5u4.pdf
Nussbeck_2-cssjfgu5kh5u4.pdfGröße: 206.82 KBDownloads: 59

Datum

2006

Autor:innen

Eid, Michael
Lischetzke, Tanja

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Link zur Lizenz
oops

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 2006, 59(1), pp. 195-213. ISSN 0007-1102. eISSN 0007-1102. Available under: doi: 10.1348/000711005X67490

Zusammenfassung

Convergent and discriminant validity of psychological constructs can best be examined in the framework of multitrait–multimethod (MTMM) analysis. To gain information at the level of single items, MTMM models for categorical variables have to be applied. The CTC(M−1) model is presented as an example of an MTMM model for ordinal variables. Based on an empirical application of the CTC(M−1) model, a complex simulation study was conducted to examine the sample size requirements of the robust weighted least squares mean‐ and variance‐adjusted χ2 test of model fit (WLSMV estimator) implemented in Mplus. In particular, the simulation study analysed the χ2 approximation, the parameter estimation bias, the standard error bias, and the reliability of the WLSMV estimator depending on the varying number of items per trait–method unit (ranging from 2 to 8) and varying sample sizes (250, 500, 750, and 1000 observations). The results showed that the WLSMV estimator provided a good – albeit slightly liberal – χ2 approximation and stable and reliable parameter estimates for models of reasonable complexity (2–4 items) and small sample sizes (at least 250 observations). When more complex models with 5 or more items were analysed, larger sample sizes of at least 500 observations were needed. The most complex model with 9 trait–method units and 8 items (72 observed variables) requires sample sizes of at least 1000 observations.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690NUSSBECK, Fridtjof W., Michael EID, Tanja LISCHETZKE, 2006. Analysing multitrait–multimethod data with structural equation models for ordinal variables applying the WLSMV estimator : What sample size is needed for valid results?. In: British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 2006, 59(1), pp. 195-213. ISSN 0007-1102. eISSN 0007-1102. Available under: doi: 10.1348/000711005X67490
BibTex
@article{Nussbeck2006-05Analy-43792,
  year={2006},
  doi={10.1348/000711005X67490},
  title={Analysing multitrait–multimethod data with structural equation models for ordinal variables applying the WLSMV estimator : What sample size is needed for valid results?},
  number={1},
  volume={59},
  issn={0007-1102},
  journal={British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology},
  pages={195--213},
  author={Nussbeck, Fridtjof W. and Eid, Michael and Lischetzke, Tanja}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43792">
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:contributor>Lischetzke, Tanja</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Nussbeck, Fridtjof W.</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2006-05</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/43792/1/Nussbeck_2-cssjfgu5kh5u4.pdf"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/43792/1/Nussbeck_2-cssjfgu5kh5u4.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Nussbeck, Fridtjof W.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>Analysing multitrait–multimethod data with structural equation models for ordinal variables applying the WLSMV estimator : What sample size is needed for valid results?</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Eid, Michael</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-11-13T09:24:17Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Eid, Michael</dc:contributor>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-11-13T09:24:17Z</dc:date>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/43792"/>
    <dc:creator>Lischetzke, Tanja</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Convergent and discriminant validity of psychological constructs can best be examined in the framework of multitrait–multimethod (MTMM) analysis. To gain information at the level of single items, MTMM models for categorical variables have to be applied. The CTC(M−1) model is presented as an example of an MTMM model for ordinal variables. Based on an empirical application of the CTC(M−1) model, a complex simulation study was conducted to examine the sample size requirements of the robust weighted least squares mean‐ and variance‐adjusted χ2 test of model fit (WLSMV estimator) implemented in Mplus. In particular, the simulation study analysed the χ2 approximation, the parameter estimation bias, the standard error bias, and the reliability of the WLSMV estimator depending on the varying number of items per trait–method unit (ranging from 2 to 8) and varying sample sizes (250, 500, 750, and 1000 observations). The results showed that the WLSMV estimator provided a good – albeit slightly liberal – χ2 approximation and stable and reliable parameter estimates for models of reasonable complexity (2–4 items) and small sample sizes (at least 250 observations). When more complex models with 5 or more items were analysed, larger sample sizes of at least 500 observations were needed. The most complex model with 9 trait–method units and 8 items (72 observed variables) requires sample sizes of at least 1000 observations.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen