Publikation:

Conceptions of Infinity and Set in Lorenzen’s Operationist System

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Antos_2-ea5cgyb2a7si7.pdf
Antos_2-ea5cgyb2a7si7.pdfGröße: 541.5 KBDownloads: 92

Datum

2021

Autor:innen

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Link zur Lizenz

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Bookpart
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Sammelband
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

HEINZMANN, Gerhard, ed., Gereon WOLTERS, ed.. Paul Lorenzen : Mathematician and Logician. Cham: Springer, 2021, pp. 23-46. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science. 51. ISBN 978-3-030-65823-6. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-65824-3_3

Zusammenfassung

In the late 1940s and early 1950s, Lorenzen developed his operative logic and mathematics, a form of constructive mathematics. Nowadays this is mostly seen as a precursor of the better-known dialogical logic (Notable exceptions are the works of Schroeder-Heister 2008; Coquand and Neuwirth 2017; Kahle and Oitavem 2020.), and one might assume that the same philosophical motivations were present in both works. However, we want to show that this is not everywhere the case. In particular, we claim that Lorenzen’s well-known rejection of the actual infinite, as stated in Lorenzen (1957), was not a major motivation for operative logic and mathematics. Rather, we argue that a shift happened in Lorenzen’s treatment of the infinite from the early to the late 1950s. His early motivation for the development of operationism is concerned with a critique of the Cantorian notion of set and with related questions about the notions of countability and uncountability; it is only later that his motivation switches to focusing on the concept of infinity and the debate about actual and potential infinity.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690ANTOS, Carolin, 2021. Conceptions of Infinity and Set in Lorenzen’s Operationist System. In: HEINZMANN, Gerhard, ed., Gereon WOLTERS, ed.. Paul Lorenzen : Mathematician and Logician. Cham: Springer, 2021, pp. 23-46. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science. 51. ISBN 978-3-030-65823-6. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-65824-3_3
BibTex
@incollection{Antos2021-08-18Conce-56478,
  year={2021},
  doi={10.1007/978-3-030-65824-3_3},
  title={Conceptions of Infinity and Set in Lorenzen’s Operationist System},
  number={51},
  isbn={978-3-030-65823-6},
  publisher={Springer},
  address={Cham},
  series={Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science},
  booktitle={Paul Lorenzen : Mathematician and Logician},
  pages={23--46},
  editor={Heinzmann, Gerhard and Wolters, Gereon},
  author={Antos, Carolin}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/56478">
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/56478/1/Antos_2-ea5cgyb2a7si7.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Antos, Carolin</dc:contributor>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-02-10T07:49:03Z</dc:date>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/56478"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In the late 1940s and early 1950s, Lorenzen developed his operative logic and mathematics, a form of constructive mathematics. Nowadays this is mostly seen as a precursor of the better-known dialogical logic (Notable exceptions are the works of Schroeder-Heister 2008; Coquand and Neuwirth 2017; Kahle and Oitavem 2020.), and one might assume that the same philosophical motivations were present in both works. However, we want to show that this is not everywhere the case. In particular, we claim that Lorenzen’s well-known rejection of the actual infinite, as stated in Lorenzen (1957), was not a major motivation for operative logic and mathematics. Rather, we argue that a shift happened in Lorenzen’s treatment of the infinite from the early to the late 1950s. His early motivation for the development of operationism is concerned with a critique of the Cantorian notion of set and with related questions about the notions of countability and uncountability; it is only later that his motivation switches to focusing on the concept of infinity and the debate about actual and potential infinity.</dcterms:abstract>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/56478/1/Antos_2-ea5cgyb2a7si7.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2021-08-18</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Antos, Carolin</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>Conceptions of Infinity and Set in Lorenzen’s Operationist System</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-02-10T07:49:03Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen