Publikation: Sobel Sequences : Relevancy or Imprecision?
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Sobel sequences were recently split into two independent phenomena by Klecha: Reversible True Sobel sequences and irreversible Lewis sequences. In this paper we show that Klecha’s prediction of unidirectionality for Lewis sequences is too strong. To this effect, we propose an alternate analysis, using Lewis’ contextualist relevancy-based framework for conditionals, from which a weaker version of Klecha’s analysis follows naturally, if we accept Bennett and Arregui’s view on how causality affects world similarity. In doing so, we automatically provide an explanation for infelicitous reverse True Sobel sequences, which is, as we also show, a problem for Klecha’s current account. Finally, we reunify the analysis of both sequence types under a single overarching linguistic phenomenon by treating the individual sequence types as proper subsets of Sobel sequences.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
KRASSNIG, David, 2017. Sobel Sequences : Relevancy or Imprecision?. 21st Amsterdam Colloquium 2017. Amsterdam, 20. Dez. 2017 - 22. Dez. 2017. In: CREMERS, Alexandre, ed., Thom VAN GESSEL, ed., Floris ROELOFSEN, ed.. Proceedings of the 21st Amsterdam Colloquium 2017. Amsterdam: Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam, 2017, pp. 325-334BibTex
@inproceedings{Krassnig2017Sobel-66295, year={2017}, title={Sobel Sequences : Relevancy or Imprecision?}, url={https://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/jZiM2FhZ/AC2017-Proceedings.pdf}, publisher={Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam}, address={Amsterdam}, booktitle={Proceedings of the 21st Amsterdam Colloquium 2017}, pages={325--334}, editor={Cremers, Alexandre and van Gessel, Thom and Roelofsen, Floris}, author={Krassnig, David} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/66295"> <dcterms:title>Sobel Sequences : Relevancy or Imprecision?</dcterms:title> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/66295/4/Krassnig_2-f0oxml6ujz4d2.pdf"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-03-06T08:06:53Z</dcterms:available> <dc:contributor>Krassnig, David</dc:contributor> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-03-06T08:06:53Z</dc:date> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/66295/4/Krassnig_2-f0oxml6ujz4d2.pdf"/> <dcterms:issued>2017</dcterms:issued> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:creator>Krassnig, David</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract>Sobel sequences were recently split into two independent phenomena by Klecha: Reversible True Sobel sequences and irreversible Lewis sequences. In this paper we show that Klecha’s prediction of unidirectionality for Lewis sequences is too strong. To this effect, we propose an alternate analysis, using Lewis’ contextualist relevancy-based framework for conditionals, from which a weaker version of Klecha’s analysis follows naturally, if we accept Bennett and Arregui’s view on how causality affects world similarity. In doing so, we automatically provide an explanation for infelicitous reverse True Sobel sequences, which is, as we also show, a problem for Klecha’s current account. Finally, we reunify the analysis of both sequence types under a single overarching linguistic phenomenon by treating the individual sequence types as proper subsets of Sobel sequences.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/66295"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>