Epiphytic bacterial community composition on two common submerged macrophytes in brackish water and freshwater

dc.contributor.authorHempel, Melaniedeu
dc.contributor.authorBlume, Majadeu
dc.contributor.authorBlindow, Irmgarddeu
dc.contributor.authorGross, Elisabeth
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-24T17:29:18Zdeu
dc.date.available2011-03-24T17:29:18Zdeu
dc.date.issued2008deu
dc.description.abstractBackground:
Plants and their heterotrophic bacterial biofilm communities possibly strongly interact, especially in aquatic systems. We aimed to ascertain whether different macrophytes or their habitats determine bacterial community composition. We compared the composition of epiphytic bacteria on two common aquatic macrophytes, the macroalga Chara aspera Willd. and the angiosperm Myriophyllum spicatum L., in two habitats, freshwater (Lake Constance) and brackish water (Schaproder Bodden), using fluorescence in situ hybridization. The bacterial community composition was analysed based on habitat, plant species, and plant part.

Results:
The bacterial abundance was higher on plants from brackish water [5.3 × 107 cells (g dry mass)-1] than on plants from freshwater [1.3 × 107 cells (g dry mass)-1], with older shoots having a higher abundance. The organic content of freshwater plants was lower than that of brackish water plants (35 vs. 58%), and lower in C. aspera than in M. spicatum (41 vs. 52%). The content of nutrients, chlorophyll, total phenolic compounds, and anthocyanin differed in the plants and habitats. Especially the content of total phenolic compounds and anthocyanin was higher in M. spicatum, and in general higher in the freshwater than in the brackish water habitat. Members of the Cytophaga-Flavobacteria-Bacteroidetes group were abundant in all samples (5 35% of the total cell counts) and were especially dominant in M. spicatum samples. Alphaproteobacteria were the second major group (3 17% of the total cell counts). Betaproteobacteria, gammaproteobacteria, and actinomycetes were present in all samples (5 or 10% of the total cell counts). Planctomycetes were almost absent on M. spicatum in freshwater, but present on C. aspera in freshwater and on both plants in brackish water.

Conclusion:
Bacterial biofilm communities on the surface of aquatic plants might be influenced by the host plant and environmental factors. Distinct plant species, plant part and habitat specific differences in total cell counts and two bacterial groups (CFB, planctomycetes) support the combined impact of substrate (plant) and habitat on epiphytic bacterial community composition. The presence of polyphenols might explain the distinct bacterial community on freshwater M. at of M. spicatum in brackish water and of C. aspera in both habitats.
eng
dc.description.versionpublished
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfdeu
dc.identifier.citationFirst publ. in: BMC Microbiology 2008, 8:58deu
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2180-8-58
dc.identifier.pmid18402668
dc.identifier.ppn303609818deu
dc.identifier.urihttp://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/6805
dc.language.isoengdeu
dc.legacy.dateIssued2009deu
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
dc.subjectepyphytic bacterial community compositiondeu
dc.subjectsubmerged macrophytesdeu
dc.subjectbrackish waterdeu
dc.subjectfreshwaterdeu
dc.subject.ddc570deu
dc.titleEpiphytic bacterial community composition on two common submerged macrophytes in brackish water and freshwatereng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEdeu
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Hempel2008Epiph-6805,
  year={2008},
  doi={10.1186/1471-2180-8-58},
  title={Epiphytic bacterial community composition on two common submerged macrophytes in brackish water and freshwater},
  number={58},
  volume={8},
  issn={1471-2180},
  journal={BMC Microbiology},
  author={Hempel, Melanie and Blume, Maja and Blindow, Irmgard and Gross, Elisabeth}
}
kops.citation.iso690HEMPEL, Melanie, Maja BLUME, Irmgard BLINDOW, Elisabeth GROSS, 2008. Epiphytic bacterial community composition on two common submerged macrophytes in brackish water and freshwater. In: BMC Microbiology. 2008, 8(58), pp. 58. ISSN 1471-2180. eISSN 1471-2180. Available under: doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-8-58deu
kops.citation.iso690HEMPEL, Melanie, Maja BLUME, Irmgard BLINDOW, Elisabeth GROSS, 2008. Epiphytic bacterial community composition on two common submerged macrophytes in brackish water and freshwater. In: BMC Microbiology. 2008, 8(58), pp. 58. ISSN 1471-2180. eISSN 1471-2180. Available under: doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-8-58eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/6805">
    <dc:contributor>Blindow, Irmgard</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T17:29:18Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Background:&lt;br /&gt;Plants and their heterotrophic bacterial biofilm communities possibly strongly interact, especially in aquatic systems. We aimed to ascertain whether different macrophytes or their habitats determine bacterial community composition. We compared the composition of epiphytic bacteria on two common aquatic macrophytes, the macroalga Chara aspera Willd. and the angiosperm Myriophyllum spicatum L., in two habitats, freshwater (Lake Constance) and brackish water (Schaproder Bodden), using fluorescence in situ hybridization. The bacterial community composition was analysed based on habitat, plant species, and plant part.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Results:&lt;br /&gt;The bacterial abundance was higher on plants from brackish water [5.3 × 107 cells (g dry mass)-1] than on plants from freshwater [1.3 × 107 cells (g dry mass)-1], with older shoots having a higher abundance. The organic content of freshwater plants was lower than that of brackish water plants (35 vs. 58%), and lower in C. aspera than in M. spicatum (41 vs. 52%). The content of nutrients, chlorophyll, total phenolic compounds, and anthocyanin differed in the plants and habitats. Especially the content of total phenolic compounds and anthocyanin was higher in M. spicatum, and in general higher in the freshwater than in the brackish water habitat. Members of the Cytophaga-Flavobacteria-Bacteroidetes group were abundant in all samples (5 35% of the total cell counts) and were especially dominant in M. spicatum samples. Alphaproteobacteria were the second major group (3 17% of the total cell counts). Betaproteobacteria, gammaproteobacteria, and actinomycetes were present in all samples (5 or 10% of the total cell counts). Planctomycetes were almost absent on M. spicatum in freshwater, but present on C. aspera in freshwater and on both plants in brackish water.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Conclusion:&lt;br /&gt;Bacterial biofilm communities on the surface of aquatic plants might be influenced by the host plant and environmental factors. Distinct plant species, plant part and habitat specific differences in total cell counts and two bacterial groups (CFB, planctomycetes) support the combined impact of substrate (plant) and habitat on epiphytic bacterial community composition. The presence of polyphenols might explain the distinct bacterial community on freshwater M. at of M. spicatum in brackish water and of C. aspera in both habitats.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: BMC Microbiology 2008, 8:58</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/6805"/>
    <dc:creator>Blindow, Irmgard</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:title>Epiphytic bacterial community composition on two common submerged macrophytes in brackish water and freshwater</dcterms:title>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/6805/1/Hempel_etal_2008_Epiphytic_bacteria_Myr_Chara_final.pdf"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Blume, Maja</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Gross, Elisabeth</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Hempel, Melanie</dc:contributor>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T17:29:18Z</dc:date>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/6805/1/Hempel_etal_2008_Epiphytic_bacteria_Myr_Chara_final.pdf"/>
    <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    <dcterms:issued>2008</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Gross, Elisabeth</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Blume, Maja</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:creator>Hempel, Melanie</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.openAccessopenaccessgreen
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-74902deu
kops.opus.id7490deu
kops.sourcefieldBMC Microbiology. 2008, <b>8</b>(58), pp. 58. ISSN 1471-2180. eISSN 1471-2180. Available under: doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-8-58deu
kops.sourcefield.plainBMC Microbiology. 2008, 8(58), pp. 58. ISSN 1471-2180. eISSN 1471-2180. Available under: doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-8-58deu
kops.sourcefield.plainBMC Microbiology. 2008, 8(58), pp. 58. ISSN 1471-2180. eISSN 1471-2180. Available under: doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-8-58eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationcf35060f-a3da-4e6e-8333-c86a337736a0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverycf35060f-a3da-4e6e-8333-c86a337736a0
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage58
source.bibliographicInfo.issue58
source.bibliographicInfo.volume8
source.identifier.eissn1471-2180
source.identifier.issn1471-2180
source.periodicalTitleBMC Microbiology

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Hempel_etal_2008_Epiphytic_bacteria_Myr_Chara_final.pdf
Größe:
284.19 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format