Publikation: Emotion emphasis effects in moral judgment are moderated by mindsets
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
In two studies, emotion emphasis effects on moral judgment are demonstrated. The studies indicate that emphasizing negative consequences in trolley-type dilemmas with emotional language produces more utilitarian responses if such emphasis is on the consequences of the deontological option, and more deontological responses if it is on the consequences of the utilitarian option. This effect was moderated by action-phase related mindsets. Individuals in an implemental mindset were less susceptible to the emotion emphasis effect than individuals in a deliberative mindset (Studies 1, 2). By also using an eye-tracking task in Study 2, we demonstrated that our implemental mindset participants’ visual attention was more focused—in particular on goal-directed means—than that of the deliberative mindset participants.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
DOERFLINGER, Johannes, Peter M. GOLLWITZER, 2020. Emotion emphasis effects in moral judgment are moderated by mindsets. In: Motivation and Emotion. Springer. 2020, 44(6), pp. 880-896. ISSN 0146-7239. eISSN 1573-6644. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s11031-020-09847-1BibTex
@article{Doerflinger2020-12Emoti-50451, year={2020}, doi={10.1007/s11031-020-09847-1}, title={Emotion emphasis effects in moral judgment are moderated by mindsets}, number={6}, volume={44}, issn={0146-7239}, journal={Motivation and Emotion}, pages={880--896}, author={Doerflinger, Johannes and Gollwitzer, Peter M.} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/50451"> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:contributor>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-08-05T12:35:23Z</dc:date> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dcterms:issued>2020-12</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In two studies, emotion emphasis effects on moral judgment are demonstrated. The studies indicate that emphasizing negative consequences in trolley-type dilemmas with emotional language produces more utilitarian responses if such emphasis is on the consequences of the deontological option, and more deontological responses if it is on the consequences of the utilitarian option. This effect was moderated by action-phase related mindsets. Individuals in an implemental mindset were less susceptible to the emotion emphasis effect than individuals in a deliberative mindset (Studies 1, 2). By also using an eye-tracking task in Study 2, we demonstrated that our implemental mindset participants’ visual attention was more focused—in particular on goal-directed means—than that of the deliberative mindset participants.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/50451/1/Doerflinger_2-fi738tnd8dxf0.pdf"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/50451"/> <dc:creator>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:creator> <dcterms:title>Emotion emphasis effects in moral judgment are moderated by mindsets</dcterms:title> <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/50451/1/Doerflinger_2-fi738tnd8dxf0.pdf"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-08-05T12:35:23Z</dcterms:available> <dc:contributor>Doerflinger, Johannes</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Doerflinger, Johannes</dc:creator> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>