Lehrer Meets Ranking Theory

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Spohn_2002_Lehrer_Meets.pdf
Spohn_2002_Lehrer_Meets.pdfGröße: 121.65 KBDownloads: 551
Datum
2002
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Sammelband
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
OLSSON, Erik J., ed.. The Epistemology of Keith Lehrer. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002, pp. 119-132
Zusammenfassung

Meets what? Ranking theory is, as far as I know, the only existing theory suited for underpinning Keith Lehrer s account of knowledge and justification. If this is true, it s high time to bring both together. This is what I shall do in this paper. However, the result of defining Lehrer s primitive notions in terms of ranking theory will be disappointing: justified acceptance will, depending on the interpretation, either have an unintelligible structure or reduce to mere acceptance, and in the latter interpretation knowledge will reduce to true belief. Of course, this result will require a discussion of who should be disappointed. So, the plan of the paper is simple: In section 1 I shall briefly state what is required for underpinning Lehrer s account and why most of the familiar theories fail to do so. In section 2 I shall briefly motivate and introduce ranking theory. Basing Lehrer s account on it will be entirely straightforward. Section 3 proves the above-mentioned results. Section 4, finally, discusses the possible conclusions.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Datensätze
Zitieren
ISO 690SPOHN, Wolfgang, 2002. Lehrer Meets Ranking Theory. In: OLSSON, Erik J., ed.. The Epistemology of Keith Lehrer. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002, pp. 119-132
BibTex
@incollection{Spohn2002Lehre-3520,
  year={2002},
  title={Lehrer Meets Ranking Theory},
  publisher={Kluwer},
  address={Dordrecht},
  booktitle={The Epistemology of Keith Lehrer},
  pages={119--132},
  editor={Olsson, Erik J.},
  author={Spohn, Wolfgang}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/3520">
    <dcterms:issued>2002</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/3520"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3520/1/Spohn_2002_Lehrer_Meets.pdf"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3520/1/Spohn_2002_Lehrer_Meets.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:title>Lehrer Meets Ranking Theory</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Meets what? Ranking theory is, as far as I know, the only existing theory suited for underpinning Keith Lehrer s account of knowledge and justification. If this is true, it s high time to bring both together. This is what I shall do in this paper. However, the result of defining Lehrer s primitive notions in terms of ranking theory will be disappointing: justified acceptance will, depending on the interpretation, either have an unintelligible structure or reduce to mere acceptance, and in the latter interpretation knowledge will reduce to true belief. Of course, this result will require a discussion of who should be disappointed. So, the plan of the paper is simple: In section 1 I shall briefly state what is required for underpinning Lehrer s account and why most of the familiar theories fail to do so. In section 2 I shall briefly motivate and introduce ranking theory. Basing Lehrer s account on it will be entirely straightforward. Section 3 proves the above-mentioned results. Section 4, finally, discusses the possible conclusions.</dcterms:abstract>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: The Epistemology of Keith Lehrer / Erik J. Olsson (ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002, pp. 119-132</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic</dc:rights>
    <dc:contributor>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T13:46:37Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T13:46:37Z</dc:date>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen