Do fluency-induced pupillary responses reflect aesthetic affect?
Do fluency-induced pupillary responses reflect aesthetic affect?
Loading...
Date
2018
Editors
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
URI (citable link)
DOI (citable link)
International patent number
Link to the license
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Title in another language
Publication type
Journal article
Publication status
Published
Published in
Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts ; 12 (2018), 3. - pp. 294-303. - ISSN 1931-3896. - eISSN 1931-390X
Abstract
Recently, Kuchinke, Trapp, Jacobs, and Leder (2009) used pupillary peak dilations (PD) to test the hypothesis that fluent picture processing elicits aesthetic affects. They used reproductions of cubist pictures of different abstractness as stimuli, which was assumed to modulate processing fluency. As a result, less abstract pictures were not only processed more fluently and preferred, they also produced larger PDs than more abstract ones. This was interpreted as support of their hypothesis. The aim of the present study was to replicate and generalize these results with an improved method and by adding expressionist pictures, which covered a relatively large range of abstractness. In the first experiment, where art style was blocked, there were no clear results. Therefore, we randomized art style in the second experiment. This time PDs increased with decreasing abstractness, even though significantly only for the expressionist pictures. However, there was no relation between preference and PDs. Thus, although we also observed a covariation between abstractness and pupil size, our data do not support the idea that PDs reflect fluency-induced aesthetic affect.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
150 Psychology
Keywords
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690
ELSCHNER, Sophie G., Ronald HÜBNER, Michael DAMBACHER, 2018. Do fluency-induced pupillary responses reflect aesthetic affect?. In: Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 12(3), pp. 294-303. ISSN 1931-3896. eISSN 1931-390X. Available under: doi: 10.1037/aca0000139BibTex
@article{Elschner2018-08fluen-41483.2, year={2018}, doi={10.1037/aca0000139}, title={Do fluency-induced pupillary responses reflect aesthetic affect?}, number={3}, volume={12}, issn={1931-3896}, journal={Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts}, pages={294--303}, author={Elschner, Sophie G. and Hübner, Ronald and Dambacher, Michael} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/41483.2"> <dc:creator>Hübner, Ronald</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/41483.2"/> <dc:contributor>Dambacher, Michael</dc:contributor> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/41483.2/1/Elschner_2-jqwatsqw451s6.pdf"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:title>Do fluency-induced pupillary responses reflect aesthetic affect?</dcterms:title> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/41483.2/1/Elschner_2-jqwatsqw451s6.pdf"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-09-18T08:25:14Z</dcterms:available> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:creator>Dambacher, Michael</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Elschner, Sophie G.</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Hübner, Ronald</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Elschner, Sophie G.</dc:creator> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-09-18T08:25:14Z</dc:date> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:issued>2018-08</dcterms:issued> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Recently, Kuchinke, Trapp, Jacobs, and Leder (2009) used pupillary peak dilations (PD) to test the hypothesis that fluent picture processing elicits aesthetic affects. They used reproductions of cubist pictures of different abstractness as stimuli, which was assumed to modulate processing fluency. As a result, less abstract pictures were not only processed more fluently and preferred, they also produced larger PDs than more abstract ones. This was interpreted as support of their hypothesis. The aim of the present study was to replicate and generalize these results with an improved method and by adding expressionist pictures, which covered a relatively large range of abstractness. In the first experiment, where art style was blocked, there were no clear results. Therefore, we randomized art style in the second experiment. This time PDs increased with decreasing abstractness, even though significantly only for the expressionist pictures. However, there was no relation between preference and PDs. Thus, although we also observed a covariation between abstractness and pupil size, our data do not support the idea that PDs reflect fluency-induced aesthetic affect.</dcterms:abstract> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
Yes
Refereed
Yes