Publikation: The role of epistemic drift in online civic discourse about science
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Our societies are experiencing an epistemic drift, that is a changing understanding of what it means to be “honest” and how to arrive at “truth”. This drift has increasingly replaced reliance on evidence and facts during truth-seeking with reliance on beliefs, feelings, and intuitions alone. This is especially important in civic discourse about science, which by its very nature relies on evidence over intuition and feelings. We posit that the role of epistemic drift in civic discourse about science is observable in online discussions and can be analyzed through their digital traces. Building on observational and experimental work, we propose a model in which epistemic drift fuels low-quality information sharing through its interplay with emotions. In this view, epistemic drift also drives online toxicity, which creates apparent polarization and erodes the quality of online civic discourse on scientific topics like health and climate change.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
LEWANDOWSKY, Stephan, David GARCIA, 2026. The role of epistemic drift in online civic discourse about science. In: Current Opinion in Psychology. Elsevier. 2026, 68, 102266. ISSN 2352-250X. eISSN 2352-2518. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2026.102266BibTex
@article{Lewandowsky2026-04epist-75762,
title={The role of epistemic drift in online civic discourse about science},
year={2026},
doi={10.1016/j.copsyc.2026.102266},
volume={68},
issn={2352-250X},
journal={Current Opinion in Psychology},
author={Lewandowsky, Stephan and Garcia, David},
note={Article Number: 102266}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/75762">
<dc:contributor>Garcia, David</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/75762/1/Lewandowsky_2-kfwxh3fmm9qm9.pdf"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
<dcterms:issued>2026-04</dcterms:issued>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2026-01-20T07:58:59Z</dcterms:available>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
<dc:contributor>Lewandowsky, Stephan</dc:contributor>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/75762"/>
<dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
<dcterms:title>The role of epistemic drift in online civic discourse about science</dcterms:title>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/75762/1/Lewandowsky_2-kfwxh3fmm9qm9.pdf"/>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:abstract>Our societies are experiencing an epistemic drift, that is a changing understanding of what it means to be “honest” and how to arrive at “truth”. This drift has increasingly replaced reliance on evidence and facts during truth-seeking with reliance on beliefs, feelings, and intuitions alone. This is especially important in civic discourse about science, which by its very nature relies on evidence over intuition and feelings. We posit that the role of epistemic drift in civic discourse about science is observable in online discussions and can be analyzed through their digital traces. Building on observational and experimental work, we propose a model in which epistemic drift fuels low-quality information sharing through its interplay with emotions. In this view, epistemic drift also drives online toxicity, which creates apparent polarization and erodes the quality of online civic discourse on scientific topics like health and climate change.</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:creator>Garcia, David</dc:creator>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2026-01-20T07:58:59Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Lewandowsky, Stephan</dc:creator>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>