Publikation: Is Kant (W)right? : On Kant's Regulative Ideas and Wright's Entitlements
Lade...
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2013
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Kant-Yearbook. 2013, 5, pp. 1-32. ISSN 1868-4599. eISSN 1868-4602. Available under: doi: 10.1515/kantyb.2013.5.1.1
Zusammenfassung
This paper discusses a structural analogy between Kant’s theory of regulative ideas, as he develops it in the Appendix to the Transcendental Dialectic, and Crispin Wright’s theory of epistemic entitlements. First, I argue that certain exegetical difficulties with respect to the Appendix rest on serious systematic problems, which – given other assumptions of the Critique of Pure Reason – Kant is unable to solve. Second, I argue that because of the identified structural analogy between Kant’s and Wright’s views the project Kant pursues in the Appendix can be rehabilitated by recourse to Wright’s theory.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
BRIESEN, Jochen, 2013. Is Kant (W)right? : On Kant's Regulative Ideas and Wright's Entitlements. In: Kant-Yearbook. 2013, 5, pp. 1-32. ISSN 1868-4599. eISSN 1868-4602. Available under: doi: 10.1515/kantyb.2013.5.1.1BibTex
@article{Briesen2013Wrigh-26685,
year={2013},
doi={10.1515/kantyb.2013.5.1.1},
title={Is Kant (W)right? : On Kant's Regulative Ideas and Wright's Entitlements},
volume={5},
issn={1868-4599},
journal={Kant-Yearbook},
pages={1--32},
author={Briesen, Jochen}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/26685">
<dc:creator>Briesen, Jochen</dc:creator>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/26685"/>
<dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Kant-Yearbook ; 5 (2013). - S. 1-32</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-03-12T08:16:20Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This paper discusses a structural analogy between Kant’s theory of regulative ideas, as he develops it in the Appendix to the Transcendental Dialectic, and Crispin Wright’s theory of epistemic entitlements. First, I argue that certain exegetical difficulties with respect to the Appendix rest on serious systematic problems, which – given other assumptions of the Critique of Pure Reason – Kant is unable to solve. Second, I argue that because of the identified structural analogy between Kant’s and Wright’s views the project Kant pursues in the Appendix can be rehabilitated by recourse to Wright’s theory.</dcterms:abstract>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<dcterms:title>Is Kant (W)right? : On Kant's Regulative Ideas and Wright's Entitlements</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dc:contributor>Briesen, Jochen</dc:contributor>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-03-12T08:16:20Z</dc:date>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
