Of fillings and feelings : locating affect, attention, and vagueness

Krämer, Steffen

Of fillings and feelings : locating affect, attention, and vagueness

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2019

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory. Routledge. 2019, 20(1), pp. 101-117. ISSN 1600-910X. eISSN 2159-9149. Available under: doi: 10.1080/1600910x.2019.1566156

Zusammenfassung

The article discusses the location of affect in human experience bysituating the concept in relation to attention and to differentdegrees of propositional structuring. By bringing togetherextended mind theories, the affect philosophies of Spinoza andDeleuze, and Whitehead’s theory of intensities, the article seeks tomediate between different strands of affect theory; especiallybetween what has been termed‘non-representational’theories ofaffect and those that couple affective processes with intentionaland perceptual contents. The article will end by discussingvagueness as an important empirical interface in both trajectoriesof theorizing affect.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

800 Literatur, Rhetorik, Literaturwissenschaft

Schlagwörter

Affect, space, vagueness, experience, extended mind, Whitehead, Deleuze

Zitieren

ISO 690

KRÄMER, Steffen, 2019. Of fillings and feelings : locating affect, attention, and vagueness. In: Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory. Routledge. 2019, 20(1), pp. 101-117. ISSN 1600-910X. eISSN 2159-9149. Available under: doi: 10.1080/1600910x.2019.1566156

BibTex

@article{Kramer2019-01-02filli-68463,
  year={2019},
  doi={10.1080/1600910x.2019.1566156},
  title={Of fillings and feelings : locating affect, attention, and vagueness},
  number={1},
  volume={20},
  issn={1600-910X},
  journal={Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory},
  pages={101--117},
  author={Krämer, Steffen}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/68463">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:title>Of fillings and feelings : locating affect, attention, and vagueness</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Krämer, Steffen</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-11-27T08:51:08Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Krämer, Steffen</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/68463"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/38"/>
    <dcterms:abstract>The article discusses the location of affect in human experience bysituating the concept in relation to attention and to differentdegrees  of  propositional  structuring.  By  bringing  togetherextended mind theories, the affect philosophies of Spinoza andDeleuze, and Whitehead’s theory of intensities, the article seeks tomediate between different strands of affect theory; especiallybetween what has been termed‘non-representational’theories ofaffect and those that couple affective processes with intentionaland perceptual contents. The article will end by discussingvagueness as an important empirical interface in both trajectoriesof theorizing affect.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:issued>2019-01-02</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-11-27T08:51:08Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/38"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Nein

Begutachtet

Unbekannt