Discourse-structuring conditionals and past tense

Csipak, Eva

Discourse-structuring conditionals and past tense

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2018

Autor:innen

Csipak, Eva

Sammlungen

Linguistik

Publikationstyp

Beitrag zu einem Konferenzband

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

TRUSWELL, Robert, ed. and others. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 21. 2018, pp. 301-316

Zusammenfassung

In this paper I present some data that challenges the view that a unified semantics of biscuit conditionals and hypothetical conditionals is possible. There is a class of biscuit conditionals that cannot occur with past temporal reference. In these cases, the antecedent serves to structure the discourse and as such must be true of the discourse situation. I argue that this is the reason why the past tense is incompatible with these conditionals, and therefore we can nevertheless maintain a unified semantics for hypothetical and biscuit conditionals.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

400 Sprachwissenschaft, Linguistik

Konferenz

Sinn und Bedeutung 21, 4. Sept. 2016 - 6. Sept. 2016, Edinburgh

Zitieren

ISO 690

CSIPAK, Eva, 2018. Discourse-structuring conditionals and past tense. Sinn und Bedeutung 21. Edinburgh, 4. Sept. 2016 - 6. Sept. 2016. In: TRUSWELL, Robert, ed. and others. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 21. 2018, pp. 301-316

BibTex

@inproceedings{Csipak2018Disco-44111,
  year={2018},
  title={Discourse-structuring conditionals and past tense},
  url={https://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/DRjNjViN/Csipak.pdf},
  booktitle={Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 21},
  pages={301--316},
  editor={Truswell, Robert},
  author={Csipak, Eva}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44111">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <dcterms:title>Discourse-structuring conditionals and past tense</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-12-03T14:59:06Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:issued>2018</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-12-03T14:59:06Z</dc:date>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/44111"/>
    <dc:creator>Csipak, Eva</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In this paper I present some data that challenges the view that a unified semantics of biscuit conditionals and hypothetical conditionals is possible. There is a class of biscuit conditionals that cannot occur with past temporal reference. In these cases, the antecedent serves to structure the discourse and as such must be true of the discourse situation. I argue that this is the reason why the past tense is incompatible with these conditionals, and therefore we can nevertheless maintain a unified semantics for hypothetical and biscuit conditionals.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Csipak, Eva</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

URL der Originalveröffentl.

https://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/DRjNjViN/Csipak.pdf

Prüfdatum der URL

2018-12-03

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja