Theta Oscillations Reflect the Dynamics of Interference in Episodic Memory Retrieval

dc.contributor.authorStaudigl, Tobias
dc.contributor.authorHanslmayr, Simon
dc.contributor.authorBäuml, Karl-Heinzdeu
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-24T17:05:42Zdeu
dc.date.available2011-03-24T17:05:42Zdeu
dc.date.issued2010deu
dc.description.abstractSelectively retrieving episodic information from a cue often induces interference from related episodes. To promote successful retrieval of the target episode, such interference is resolved by inhibition, causing retrieval-induced forgetting of the related but irrelevant information. Passively studying the episodic information again (reexposure) does not show this effect. This study examined the hypothesis that brain oscillations in the theta band (5 9 Hz) reflect the dynamics of interference in selective memory retrieval, analyzing EEG data from 24 healthy human subjects (21 women, 3 men). High versus low levels of interference were investigated by comparing the effects of selective retrieval with the effects of reexposure of material, with the former, but not the latter, inducing interference. Moreover, we analyzed repeated cycles of selective retrieval and reexposure, assuming that interference is reduced by inhibition across retrieval cycles, but not across reexposure cycles. We found greater theta band activity in selective retrieval than in reexposure, and a reduction in theta amplitude from the first to the second cycle of retrieval predicting the amount of retrieval-induced forgetting; the sources of theta amplitude reduction across retrieval cycles were located in the anterior cingulate cortex. No difference in theta activity was found across repeated cycles of reexposure. The results suggest that higher levels of interference in episodic memory are indexed by more theta band activity, and that successful interference resolution via inhibition causes a reduction in theta amplitude. Thus, theta band activity can serve as a neural marker of the dynamics of interference in selective episodic retrieval.eng
dc.description.versionpublished
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfdeu
dc.identifier.citationFirst publ. in: The Journal of Neuroscience 30 (2010), 34, pp. 11356-11362deu
dc.identifier.doi10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0637-10.2010
dc.identifier.ppn336177410deu
dc.identifier.urihttp://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/6507
dc.language.isoengdeu
dc.legacy.dateIssued2011deu
dc.rightsterms-of-usedeu
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/deu
dc.subject.ddc150deu
dc.titleTheta Oscillations Reflect the Dynamics of Interference in Episodic Memory Retrievaleng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEdeu
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Staudigl2010Theta-6507,
  year={2010},
  doi={10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0637-10.2010},
  title={Theta Oscillations Reflect the Dynamics of Interference in Episodic Memory Retrieval},
  number={34},
  volume={30},
  journal={The Journal of Neuroscience},
  pages={11356--11362},
  author={Staudigl, Tobias and Hanslmayr, Simon and Bäuml, Karl-Heinz}
}
kops.citation.iso690STAUDIGL, Tobias, Simon HANSLMAYR, Karl-Heinz BÄUML, 2010. Theta Oscillations Reflect the Dynamics of Interference in Episodic Memory Retrieval. In: The Journal of Neuroscience. 2010, 30(34), pp. 11356-11362. Available under: doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0637-10.2010deu
kops.citation.iso690STAUDIGL, Tobias, Simon HANSLMAYR, Karl-Heinz BÄUML, 2010. Theta Oscillations Reflect the Dynamics of Interference in Episodic Memory Retrieval. In: The Journal of Neuroscience. 2010, 30(34), pp. 11356-11362. Available under: doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0637-10.2010eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/6507">
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T17:05:42Z</dc:date>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/6507"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Hanslmayr, Simon</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Selectively retrieving episodic information from a cue often induces interference from related episodes. To promote successful retrieval of the target episode, such interference is resolved by inhibition, causing retrieval-induced forgetting of the related but irrelevant information. Passively studying the episodic information again (reexposure) does not show this effect. This study examined the hypothesis that brain oscillations in the theta band (5 9 Hz) reflect the dynamics of interference in selective memory retrieval, analyzing EEG data from 24 healthy human subjects (21 women, 3 men). High versus low levels of interference were investigated by comparing the effects of selective retrieval with the effects of reexposure of material, with the former, but not the latter, inducing interference. Moreover, we analyzed repeated cycles of selective retrieval and reexposure, assuming that interference is reduced by inhibition across retrieval cycles, but not across reexposure cycles. We found greater theta band activity in selective retrieval than in reexposure, and a reduction in theta amplitude from the first to the second cycle of retrieval predicting the amount of retrieval-induced forgetting; the sources of theta amplitude reduction across retrieval cycles were located in the anterior cingulate cortex. No difference in theta activity was found across repeated cycles of reexposure. The results suggest that higher levels of interference in episodic memory are indexed by more theta band activity, and that successful interference resolution via inhibition causes a reduction in theta amplitude. Thus, theta band activity can serve as a neural marker of the dynamics of interference in selective episodic retrieval.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Staudigl, Tobias</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2010</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Bäuml, Karl-Heinz</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/6507/1/Staudigletal2010.pdf"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: The Journal of Neuroscience 30 (2010), 34, pp. 11356-11362</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T17:05:42Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:creator>Hanslmayr, Simon</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>Theta Oscillations Reflect the Dynamics of Interference in Episodic Memory Retrieval</dcterms:title>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/6507/1/Staudigletal2010.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Staudigl, Tobias</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Bäuml, Karl-Heinz</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.openAccessopenaccessgreen
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-127473deu
kops.opus.id12747deu
kops.sourcefieldThe Journal of Neuroscience. 2010, <b>30</b>(34), pp. 11356-11362. Available under: doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0637-10.2010deu
kops.sourcefield.plainThe Journal of Neuroscience. 2010, 30(34), pp. 11356-11362. Available under: doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0637-10.2010deu
kops.sourcefield.plainThe Journal of Neuroscience. 2010, 30(34), pp. 11356-11362. Available under: doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0637-10.2010eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication369c84ba-da10-4374-a718-5b93a815a24a
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb8752b64-2fb0-49b4-b16a-67eca739b83e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery369c84ba-da10-4374-a718-5b93a815a24a
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage11356
source.bibliographicInfo.issue34
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage11362
source.bibliographicInfo.volume30
source.periodicalTitleThe Journal of Neuroscience

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Staudigletal2010.pdf
Größe:
927.09 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Staudigletal2010.pdf
Staudigletal2010.pdfGröße: 927.09 KBDownloads: 222