Direct Democracy : Protest Catalyst or Protest Alternative?

Fatke, Matthias; Freitag, Markus

Direct Democracy : Protest Catalyst or Protest Alternative?

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2012

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

unikn.publication.listelement.citation.prefix.version.undefined

Political Behavior. 2012, 35(2), pp. 237-260. ISSN 0190-9320. eISSN 1573-6687. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s11109-012-9194-0

Zusammenfassung

This paper presents the first investigation of whether direct Democracy supplements or undermines the attendance of demonstrations as a form of protest behavior. A first approach assumes that direct democracy is associated with fewer protests, as they function as a valve that integrates voters’ opinions, preferences, and emotions into the political process. A competing hypothesis proposes a positive relationship between direct democracy and this unconventional form of political participation due to educative effects. Drawing on individual data from recent Swiss Electoral Studies, we apply multilevel analysis and estimate a hierarchical model of the effect of the presence as well as the use of direct democratic institutions on individual protest behavior. Our empirical findings suggest that the political opportunity of direct democracy is associated with a lower individual probability to attend demonstrations.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

320 Politik

Schlagwörter

Direct democracy, Protest behavior, Political participation, Educative effect

Zitieren

ISO 690

FATKE, Matthias, Markus FREITAG, 2012. Direct Democracy : Protest Catalyst or Protest Alternative?. In: Political Behavior. 2012, 35(2), pp. 237-260. ISSN 0190-9320. eISSN 1573-6687. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s11109-012-9194-0

BibTex

@article{Fatke2012Direc-19275,
  year={2012},
  doi={10.1007/s11109-012-9194-0},
  title={Direct Democracy : Protest Catalyst or Protest Alternative?},
  number={2},
  volume={35},
  issn={0190-9320},
  journal={Political Behavior},
  pages={237--260},
  author={Fatke, Matthias and Freitag, Markus}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/19275">
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Political Behavior ; 35 (2013), 2. - S. 237-260</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-05-10T12:03:28Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-05-10T12:03:28Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Freitag, Markus</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:title>Direct Democracy : Protest Catalyst or Protest Alternative?</dcterms:title>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/19275"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:creator>Fatke, Matthias</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Freitag, Markus</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Fatke, Matthias</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2012</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This paper presents the first investigation of whether direct Democracy supplements or undermines the attendance of demonstrations as a form of protest behavior. A first approach assumes that direct democracy is associated with fewer protests, as they function as a valve that integrates voters’ opinions, preferences, and emotions into the political process. A competing hypothesis proposes a positive relationship between direct democracy and this unconventional form of political participation due to educative effects. Drawing on individual data from recent Swiss Electoral Studies, we apply multilevel analysis and estimate a hierarchical model of the effect of the presence as well as the use of direct democratic institutions on individual protest behavior. Our empirical findings suggest that the political opportunity of direct democracy is associated with a lower individual probability to attend demonstrations.</dcterms:abstract>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja