Publikation:

How differentiated integration shapes the constraining dissensus

Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2024

Autor:innen

Schraff, Dominik

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2229377
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG): 447624982

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Sammlungen

Politik- und Verwaltungswissenschaft: Publikationen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Journal of European Public Policy. Taylor & Francis. 2024, 31(9), S. 2878-2906. ISSN 1350-1763. eISSN 1466-4429. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1080/13501763.2023.2229377

Zusammenfassung

If European Union (EU) member states realise differentiations in EU Treaties, what effect do we see on public and political support for future integration? We argue on the basis of a two-tier integration theory and postfunctionalism that differentiations of member states do lead to a preference for slower future integration by its citizens and parties. Once citizens and parties are used to opting out, they demand more of the same in the future. We test our arguments with time-series cross-sectional data for 1994–2018 on all voluntary primary law opt-outs in the EU. Our panel matching estimates demonstrate that opt-outs decrease integration support. After a differentiation, parties become more Eurosceptic on average and publics express a lower preference for future integration. This suggests that differentiated integration is not a cure against Euroscepticism that leads to a unified EU in the future but rather reinforces two-tier integration.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik

Schlagwörter

Differentiation, EU integration, postfunctionalism, responsiveness, panel data, public opinion

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Vorschaubild
Datensatz
How differentiated integration shapes the constraining dissensus
(V1.0, 2023) Schraff, Dominik; Malang, Thomas

Zitieren

ISO 690MALANG, Thomas, Dominik SCHRAFF, 2024. How differentiated integration shapes the constraining dissensus. In: Journal of European Public Policy. Taylor & Francis. 2024, 31(9), S. 2878-2906. ISSN 1350-1763. eISSN 1466-4429. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1080/13501763.2023.2229377
BibTex
@article{Malang2024-09diffe-67305,
  title={How differentiated integration shapes the constraining dissensus},
  year={2024},
  doi={10.1080/13501763.2023.2229377},
  number={9},
  volume={31},
  issn={1350-1763},
  journal={Journal of European Public Policy},
  pages={2878--2906},
  author={Malang, Thomas and Schraff, Dominik}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/67305">
    <dcterms:abstract>If European Union (EU) member states realise differentiations in EU Treaties, what effect do we see on public and political support for future integration? We argue on the basis of a two-tier integration theory and postfunctionalism that differentiations of member states do lead to a preference for slower future integration by its citizens and parties. Once citizens and parties are used to opting out, they demand more of the same in the future. We test our arguments with time-series cross-sectional data for 1994–2018 on all voluntary primary law opt-outs in the EU. Our panel matching estimates demonstrate that opt-outs decrease integration support. After a differentiation, parties become more Eurosceptic on average and publics express a lower preference for future integration. This suggests that differentiated integration is not a cure against Euroscepticism that leads to a unified EU in the future but rather reinforces two-tier integration.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Schraff, Dominik</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/67305"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-07-05T08:21:27Z</dc:date>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-07-05T08:21:27Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:title>How differentiated integration shapes the constraining dissensus</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Malang, Thomas</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Schraff, Dominik</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:creator>Malang, Thomas</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2024-09</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen