Performance-based clinical tests of balance and muscle strength used in young seniors : a systematic literature review

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Bergquist_2-vvmjfzjgvpnh7.pdf
Bergquist_2-vvmjfzjgvpnh7.pdfGröße: 1.25 MBDownloads: 176
Datum
2019
Autor:innen
Bergquist, Ronny
Weber, Michaela
Ulseth, Synnøve
Helbostad, Jorunn L.
Vereijken, Beatrix
Taraldsen, Kristin
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Gold
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
BMC geriatrics. BioMed Central. 2019, 19, 9. eISSN 1471-2318. Available under: doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-1011-0
Zusammenfassung

Background:
Many balance and strength tests exist that have been designed for older seniors, often aged ≥70 years. To guide strategies for preventing functional decline, valid and reliable tests are needed to detect early signs of functional decline in young seniors. Currently, little is known about which tests are being used in young seniors and their methodological quality. This two-step review aims to 1) identify commonly used tests of balance and strength, and 2) evaluate their measurement properties in young seniors.

Methods:
First, a systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE to identify primary studies that employed performance-based tests of balance and muscle strength, and which aspects of balance and strength these tests assess in young seniors aged 60–70. Subsequently, for tests used in ≥3 studies, a second search was performed to identify method studies evaluating their measurement properties. The quality of included method studies was evaluated using the Consensus-based Standards for selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist.

Results:
Of 3454 articles identified, 295 met the inclusion criteria. For the first objective, 69 balance and 51 muscle strength tests were identified, with variations in administration mode and outcome reporting. Twenty-six balance tests and 15 muscle strength tests were used in ≥3 studies, with proactive balance tests and functional muscle power tests used most often. For the second objective, the search revealed 1880 method studies, of which nine studies (using 5 balance tests and 1 strength test) were included for quality assessment. The Timed Up and Go test was evaluated the most (4 studies), while the Community Balance and Mobility (CBM) scale was the second most assessed test (3 studies). For strength, one study assessed the reliability of the Five times sit-to-stand.

Conclusion:
Commonly used balance and muscle strength tests in young seniors vary greatly with regards to administration mode and outcome reporting. Few studies have evaluated measurement properties of these tests when used in young seniors. There is a need for standardisation of existing tests to improve their informative value and comparability. For measuring balance, the CBM is a new and promising tool to detect even small balance deficits in balance in young seniors.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
796 Sport
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Datensätze
Zitieren
ISO 690BERGQUIST, Ronny, Michaela WEBER, Michael SCHWENK, Synnøve ULSETH, Jorunn L. HELBOSTAD, Beatrix VEREIJKEN, Kristin TARALDSEN, 2019. Performance-based clinical tests of balance and muscle strength used in young seniors : a systematic literature review. In: BMC geriatrics. BioMed Central. 2019, 19, 9. eISSN 1471-2318. Available under: doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-1011-0
BibTex
@article{Bergquist2019Perfo-55168,
  year={2019},
  doi={10.1186/s12877-018-1011-0},
  title={Performance-based clinical tests of balance and muscle strength used in young seniors : a systematic literature review},
  volume={19},
  journal={BMC geriatrics},
  author={Bergquist, Ronny and Weber, Michaela and Schwenk, Michael and Ulseth, Synnøve and Helbostad, Jorunn L. and Vereijken, Beatrix and Taraldsen, Kristin},
  note={Article Number: 9}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/55168">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:creator>Bergquist, Ronny</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Weber, Michaela</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/55168/1/Bergquist_2-vvmjfzjgvpnh7.pdf"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Helbostad, Jorunn L.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Schwenk, Michael</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Bergquist, Ronny</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/55168/1/Bergquist_2-vvmjfzjgvpnh7.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Weber, Michaela</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ulseth, Synnøve</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/55168"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/35"/>
    <dc:contributor>Taraldsen, Kristin</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>Performance-based clinical tests of balance and muscle strength used in young seniors : a systematic literature review</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Helbostad, Jorunn L.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Taraldsen, Kristin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-10-06T12:25:49Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/35"/>
    <dc:creator>Vereijken, Beatrix</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Vereijken, Beatrix</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2019</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Background:&lt;br /&gt;Many balance and strength tests exist that have been designed for older seniors, often aged ≥70 years. To guide strategies for preventing functional decline, valid and reliable tests are needed to detect early signs of functional decline in young seniors. Currently, little is known about which tests are being used in young seniors and their methodological quality. This two-step review aims to 1) identify commonly used tests of balance and strength, and 2) evaluate their measurement properties in young seniors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Methods:&lt;br /&gt;First, a systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE to identify primary studies that employed performance-based tests of balance and muscle strength, and which aspects of balance and strength these tests assess in young seniors aged 60–70. Subsequently, for tests used in ≥3 studies, a second search was performed to identify method studies evaluating their measurement properties. The quality of included method studies was evaluated using the Consensus-based Standards for selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Results:&lt;br /&gt;Of 3454 articles identified, 295 met the inclusion criteria. For the first objective, 69 balance and 51 muscle strength tests were identified, with variations in administration mode and outcome reporting. Twenty-six balance tests and 15 muscle strength tests were used in ≥3 studies, with proactive balance tests and functional muscle power tests used most often. For the second objective, the search revealed 1880 method studies, of which nine studies (using 5 balance tests and 1 strength test) were included for quality assessment. The Timed Up and Go test was evaluated the most (4 studies), while the Community Balance and Mobility (CBM) scale was the second most assessed test (3 studies). For strength, one study assessed the reliability of the Five times sit-to-stand.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Conclusion:&lt;br /&gt;Commonly used balance and muscle strength tests in young seniors vary greatly with regards to administration mode and outcome reporting. Few studies have evaluated measurement properties of these tests when used in young seniors. There is a need for standardisation of existing tests to improve their informative value and comparability. For measuring balance, the CBM is a new and promising tool to detect even small balance deficits in balance in young seniors.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Ulseth, Synnøve</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-10-06T12:25:49Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Schwenk, Michael</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen