Publikation: Computational analysis of US congressional speeches reveals a shift from evidence to intuition
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Pursuit of honest and truthful decision-making is crucial for governance and accountability in democracies. However, people sometimes take different perspectives of what it means to be honest and how to pursue truthfulness. Here we explore a continuum of perspectives from evidence-based reasoning, rooted in ascertainable facts and data, at one end, to intuitive decisions that are driven by feelings and subjective interpretations, at the other. We analyse the linguistic traces of those contrasting perspectives in congressional speeches from 1879 to 2022. We find that evidence-based language has continued to decline since the mid-1970s, together with a decline in legislative productivity. The decline was accompanied by increasing partisan polarization in Congress and rising income inequality in society. The results highlight the importance of evidence-based language in political decision-making.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
AROYEHUN, Segun Toafeek, Almog SIMCHON, Fabio CARRELLA, Jana LASSER, Stephan LEWANDOWSKY, David GARCIA, 2025. Computational analysis of US congressional speeches reveals a shift from evidence to intuition. In: Nature Human Behaviour. Springer. eISSN 2397-3374. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02136-2BibTex
@article{Aroyehun2025-04-10Compu-73094, title={Computational analysis of US congressional speeches reveals a shift from evidence to intuition}, year={2025}, doi={10.1038/s41562-025-02136-2}, journal={Nature Human Behaviour}, author={Aroyehun, Segun Toafeek and Simchon, Almog and Carrella, Fabio and Lasser, Jana and Lewandowsky, Stephan and Garcia, David} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/73094"> <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights> <dc:creator>Aroyehun, Segun Toafeek</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/73094"/> <dc:creator>Simchon, Almog</dc:creator> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-04-23T11:25:37Z</dc:date> <dcterms:issued>2025-04-10</dcterms:issued> <dc:creator>Lewandowsky, Stephan</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Simchon, Almog</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-04-23T11:25:37Z</dcterms:available> <dc:contributor>Garcia, David</dc:contributor> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:contributor>Aroyehun, Segun Toafeek</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Carrella, Fabio</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Lasser, Jana</dc:contributor> <dcterms:abstract>Pursuit of honest and truthful decision-making is crucial for governance and accountability in democracies. However, people sometimes take different perspectives of what it means to be honest and how to pursue truthfulness. Here we explore a continuum of perspectives from evidence-based reasoning, rooted in ascertainable facts and data, at one end, to intuitive decisions that are driven by feelings and subjective interpretations, at the other. We analyse the linguistic traces of those contrasting perspectives in congressional speeches from 1879 to 2022. We find that evidence-based language has continued to decline since the mid-1970s, together with a decline in legislative productivity. The decline was accompanied by increasing partisan polarization in Congress and rising income inequality in society. The results highlight the importance of evidence-based language in political decision-making.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:contributor>Lewandowsky, Stephan</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Lasser, Jana</dc:creator> <dcterms:title>Computational analysis of US congressional speeches reveals a shift from evidence to intuition</dcterms:title> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:creator>Garcia, David</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Carrella, Fabio</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>