Frege, Pünjer, and Kant on Existence
Lade...
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2011
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Grazer Philosophische Studien. 2011, 82, pp. 329-351
Zusammenfassung
The paper tries to shed new exegetical light on Frege’s “Dialogue with Pünjer on Existence” by showing that Pünjer’s position in the dialogue is strongly inspired by Kantian claims about existence. It is argued that Pünjer’s wavering between a broadly Meinongian and a broadly Fregean view on existence can be explained by the fact that there are Kantian remarks which seem to speak in favour of each of these views. A suggestion is then made how Kant’s claims can be interpreted in such a way that the tension which they seem to entail disappears.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
ROSEFELDT, Tobias, 2011. Frege, Pünjer, and Kant on Existence. In: Grazer Philosophische Studien. 2011, 82, pp. 329-351BibTex
@article{Rosefeldt2011Frege-19114, year={2011}, title={Frege, Pünjer, and Kant on Existence}, volume={82}, journal={Grazer Philosophische Studien}, pages={329--351}, author={Rosefeldt, Tobias} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/19114"> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:issued>2011</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2012-05-02T09:04:42Z</dcterms:available> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:title>Frege, Pünjer, and Kant on Existence</dcterms:title> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2012-05-02T09:04:42Z</dc:date> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The paper tries to shed new exegetical light on Frege’s “Dialogue with Pünjer on Existence” by showing that Pünjer’s position in the dialogue is strongly inspired by Kantian claims about existence. It is argued that Pünjer’s wavering between a broadly Meinongian and a broadly Fregean view on existence can be explained by the fact that there are Kantian remarks which seem to speak in favour of each of these views. A suggestion is then made how Kant’s claims can be interpreted in such a way that the tension which they seem to entail disappears.</dcterms:abstract> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/19114"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dc:creator>Rosefeldt, Tobias</dc:creator> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Rosefeldt, Tobias</dc:contributor> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Publ. in: Grazer Philosophische Studien ; 82 (2011). - S. 329-351</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein