Publikation: Orthotic comfort is related to kinematics, kinetics and EMG in recreational runners
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between differences in comfort and changes in lower extremity kinematic and kinetic variables and muscle activity in response to foot orthoses.
METHODS:
Twenty-one recreational runners volunteered for this study. Three orthotic conditions (posting, custom-molding, and posting and custom-molding) were compared with a control (flat) insert. Lower extremity kinematic, kinetic, and EMG data were collected for 108 trials per subject and condition in nine sessions per subject for overground running at 4 m.s-1. Comfort for all orthotic conditions was assessed in each session using a visual analog scale. The statistical tests used included repeated measures ANOVA, linear regression analysis, and discriminant analysis (alpha = 0.05).
RESULTS:
Comfort ratings were significantly different between orthotic conditions and the control condition ([lower, upper] confidence limits; posting: [-3.1, -0.8]; molding: [0.4, 3.4]; and posting and molding: [-1.1, 1.9]); 34.9% of differences in comfort were explained by changes in 15 kinematic, kinetic, and EMG variables. The 15 kinematic, kinetic, and EMG variables that partially explained differences in comfort classified 75.0% of cases correctly to the corresponding orthotic condition.
DISCUSSION:
In general, comfort is an important and relevant feature of foot orthoses. Evaluations of foot orthoses using comfort do not only reflect subjective perceptions but also differences in functional biomechanical variables. Future research should focus on defining the relationship between comfort and biomechanical variables for material modifications of footwear, different modes of locomotion, and the general population.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
MÜNDERMANN, Annegret, Benno M. NIGG, R. Neil HUMBLE, Darren J. STEFANYSHYN, 2003. Orthotic comfort is related to kinematics, kinetics and EMG in recreational runners. In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2003, 35(10), pp. 1710-1719. ISSN 0195-9131. eISSN 1530-0315BibTex
@article{Mundermann2003Ortho-17899, year={2003}, title={Orthotic comfort is related to kinematics, kinetics and EMG in recreational runners}, number={10}, volume={35}, issn={0195-9131}, journal={Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise}, pages={1710--1719}, author={Mündermann, Annegret and Nigg, Benno M. and Humble, R. Neil and Stefanyshyn, Darren J.} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/17899"> <dcterms:issued>2003</dcterms:issued> <dc:contributor>Stefanyshyn, Darren J.</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/35"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/35"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:creator>Mündermann, Annegret</dc:creator> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:creator>Nigg, Benno M.</dc:creator> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2012-02-06T08:06:46Z</dcterms:available> <dc:creator>Stefanyshyn, Darren J.</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Humble, R. Neil</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Mündermann, Annegret</dc:contributor> <dcterms:title>Orthotic comfort is related to kinematics, kinetics and EMG in recreational runners</dcterms:title> <dc:contributor>Humble, R. Neil</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/17899"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2012-02-06T08:06:46Z</dc:date> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">PURPOSE:<br />The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between differences in comfort and changes in lower extremity kinematic and kinetic variables and muscle activity in response to foot orthoses.<br />METHODS:<br />Twenty-one recreational runners volunteered for this study. Three orthotic conditions (posting, custom-molding, and posting and custom-molding) were compared with a control (flat) insert. Lower extremity kinematic, kinetic, and EMG data were collected for 108 trials per subject and condition in nine sessions per subject for overground running at 4 m.s-1. Comfort for all orthotic conditions was assessed in each session using a visual analog scale. The statistical tests used included repeated measures ANOVA, linear regression analysis, and discriminant analysis (alpha = 0.05).<br />RESULTS:<br />Comfort ratings were significantly different between orthotic conditions and the control condition ([lower, upper] confidence limits; posting: [-3.1, -0.8]; molding: [0.4, 3.4]; and posting and molding: [-1.1, 1.9]); 34.9% of differences in comfort were explained by changes in 15 kinematic, kinetic, and EMG variables. The 15 kinematic, kinetic, and EMG variables that partially explained differences in comfort classified 75.0% of cases correctly to the corresponding orthotic condition.<br />DISCUSSION:<br />In general, comfort is an important and relevant feature of foot orthoses. Evaluations of foot orthoses using comfort do not only reflect subjective perceptions but also differences in functional biomechanical variables. Future research should focus on defining the relationship between comfort and biomechanical variables for material modifications of footwear, different modes of locomotion, and the general population.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:contributor>Nigg, Benno M.</dc:contributor> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Publ. in: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise ; 35 (2003), 10. - S. 1710-1719</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>