Evolution of toxicological science : the need for change
| dc.contributor.author | Hartung, Thomas | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-27T07:28:40Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-06-27T07:28:40Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | eng |
| dc.description.abstract | Evolution requires change but the field of toxicology has not kept pace. The top ten problems urging change are: 1) disparity of testing requirements and risk acceptance for different products and geographical areas; 2) throughput and testing costs versus testing needs; 3) limited predictivity for humans; 4) precautionary approaches from drug development adapted to other areas; 5) animal use; 6) traditional tests unsuitable for new products; 7) lack of coverage for new hazards; 8) failure to address mixtures of toxicants; 9) lack of coverage for individual susceptibilities and vulnerable subpopulations; 10) poor basic research and publication standards. The intransigence at the root of these problems is discussed with reference to current international toxicological policies and methods. For each, the limitations are reviewed with reference to key literature. While current approaches are still needed, there is room for substantial change. To meet the challenges of the 21st century, revolution rather than evolution is required. | eng |
| dc.description.version | published | eng |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1504/IJRAM.2017.082570 | eng |
| dc.identifier.ppn | 506889971 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/42705 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | eng |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | toxicity testing; high-throughput; precautionary approach; mixtures; susceptible populations. | eng |
| dc.subject.ddc | 570 | eng |
| dc.title | Evolution of toxicological science : the need for change | eng |
| dc.type | JOURNAL_ARTICLE | eng |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| kops.citation.bibtex | @article{Hartung2017Evolu-42705,
year={2017},
doi={10.1504/IJRAM.2017.082570},
title={Evolution of toxicological science : the need for change},
number={1-3},
volume={20},
issn={1466-8297},
journal={International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management},
pages={21--45},
author={Hartung, Thomas}
} | |
| kops.citation.iso690 | HARTUNG, Thomas, 2017. Evolution of toxicological science : the need for change. In: International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management. 2017, 20(1-3), pp. 21-45. ISSN 1466-8297. eISSN 1741-5241. Available under: doi: 10.1504/IJRAM.2017.082570 | deu |
| kops.citation.iso690 | HARTUNG, Thomas, 2017. Evolution of toxicological science : the need for change. In: International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management. 2017, 20(1-3), pp. 21-45. ISSN 1466-8297. eISSN 1741-5241. Available under: doi: 10.1504/IJRAM.2017.082570 | eng |
| kops.citation.rdf | <rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42705">
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/42705"/>
<dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International</dc:rights>
<dc:creator>Hartung, Thomas</dc:creator>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-06-27T07:28:40Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Evolution requires change but the field of toxicology has not kept pace. The top ten problems urging change are: 1) disparity of testing requirements and risk acceptance for different products and geographical areas; 2) throughput and testing costs versus testing needs; 3) limited predictivity for humans; 4) precautionary approaches from drug development adapted to other areas; 5) animal use; 6) traditional tests unsuitable for new products; 7) lack of coverage for new hazards; 8) failure to address mixtures of toxicants; 9) lack of coverage for individual susceptibilities and vulnerable subpopulations; 10) poor basic research and publication standards. The intransigence at the root of these problems is discussed with reference to current international toxicological policies and methods. For each, the limitations are reviewed with reference to key literature. While current approaches are still needed, there is room for substantial change. To meet the challenges of the 21st century, revolution rather than evolution is required.</dcterms:abstract>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"/>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
<dc:contributor>Hartung, Thomas</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:title>Evolution of toxicological science : the need for change</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-06-27T07:28:40Z</dcterms:available>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/42705/3/Hartung_2-1825om6bb8anm4.pdf"/>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/42705/3/Hartung_2-1825om6bb8anm4.pdf"/>
<dcterms:issued>2017</dcterms:issued>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> | |
| kops.description.openAccess | openaccesshybrid | eng |
| kops.flag.knbibliography | true | |
| kops.identifier.nbn | urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-1825om6bb8anm4 | |
| kops.sourcefield | International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management. 2017, <b>20</b>(1-3), pp. 21-45. ISSN 1466-8297. eISSN 1741-5241. Available under: doi: 10.1504/IJRAM.2017.082570 | deu |
| kops.sourcefield.plain | International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management. 2017, 20(1-3), pp. 21-45. ISSN 1466-8297. eISSN 1741-5241. Available under: doi: 10.1504/IJRAM.2017.082570 | deu |
| kops.sourcefield.plain | International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management. 2017, 20(1-3), pp. 21-45. ISSN 1466-8297. eISSN 1741-5241. Available under: doi: 10.1504/IJRAM.2017.082570 | eng |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 36e501e4-b8aa-46a8-9514-4a52792e3f9a | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 36e501e4-b8aa-46a8-9514-4a52792e3f9a | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage | 21 | eng |
| source.bibliographicInfo.issue | 1-3 | eng |
| source.bibliographicInfo.toPage | 45 | eng |
| source.bibliographicInfo.volume | 20 | eng |
| source.identifier.eissn | 1741-5241 | eng |
| source.identifier.issn | 1466-8297 | eng |
| source.periodicalTitle | International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management | eng |
Dateien
Originalbündel
1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
- Name:
- Hartung_2-1825om6bb8anm4.pdf
- Größe:
- 334.56 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Beschreibung:
Lizenzbündel
1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
- Name:
- license.txt
- Größe:
- 3.88 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Beschreibung:

