Evolution of toxicological science : the need for change

dc.contributor.authorHartung, Thomas
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-27T07:28:40Z
dc.date.available2018-06-27T07:28:40Z
dc.date.issued2017eng
dc.description.abstractEvolution requires change but the field of toxicology has not kept pace. The top ten problems urging change are: 1) disparity of testing requirements and risk acceptance for different products and geographical areas; 2) throughput and testing costs versus testing needs; 3) limited predictivity for humans; 4) precautionary approaches from drug development adapted to other areas; 5) animal use; 6) traditional tests unsuitable for new products; 7) lack of coverage for new hazards; 8) failure to address mixtures of toxicants; 9) lack of coverage for individual susceptibilities and vulnerable subpopulations; 10) poor basic research and publication standards. The intransigence at the root of these problems is discussed with reference to current international toxicological policies and methods. For each, the limitations are reviewed with reference to key literature. While current approaches are still needed, there is room for substantial change. To meet the challenges of the 21st century, revolution rather than evolution is required.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedeng
dc.identifier.doi10.1504/IJRAM.2017.082570eng
dc.identifier.ppn506889971
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/42705
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjecttoxicity testing; high-throughput; precautionary approach; mixtures; susceptible populations.eng
dc.subject.ddc570eng
dc.titleEvolution of toxicological science : the need for changeeng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEeng
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Hartung2017Evolu-42705,
  year={2017},
  doi={10.1504/IJRAM.2017.082570},
  title={Evolution of toxicological science : the need for change},
  number={1-3},
  volume={20},
  issn={1466-8297},
  journal={International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management},
  pages={21--45},
  author={Hartung, Thomas}
}
kops.citation.iso690HARTUNG, Thomas, 2017. Evolution of toxicological science : the need for change. In: International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management. 2017, 20(1-3), pp. 21-45. ISSN 1466-8297. eISSN 1741-5241. Available under: doi: 10.1504/IJRAM.2017.082570deu
kops.citation.iso690HARTUNG, Thomas, 2017. Evolution of toxicological science : the need for change. In: International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management. 2017, 20(1-3), pp. 21-45. ISSN 1466-8297. eISSN 1741-5241. Available under: doi: 10.1504/IJRAM.2017.082570eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42705">
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/42705"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:creator>Hartung, Thomas</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-06-27T07:28:40Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Evolution requires change but the field of toxicology has not kept pace. The top ten problems urging change are: 1) disparity of testing requirements and risk acceptance for different products and geographical areas; 2) throughput and testing costs versus testing needs; 3) limited predictivity for humans; 4) precautionary approaches from drug development adapted to other areas; 5) animal use; 6) traditional tests unsuitable for new products; 7) lack of coverage for new hazards; 8) failure to address mixtures of toxicants; 9) lack of coverage for individual susceptibilities and vulnerable subpopulations; 10) poor basic research and publication standards. The intransigence at the root of these problems is discussed with reference to current international toxicological policies and methods. For each, the limitations are reviewed with reference to key literature. While current approaches are still needed, there is room for substantial change. To meet the challenges of the 21st century, revolution rather than evolution is required.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:contributor>Hartung, Thomas</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>Evolution of toxicological science : the need for change</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-06-27T07:28:40Z</dcterms:available>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/42705/3/Hartung_2-1825om6bb8anm4.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/42705/3/Hartung_2-1825om6bb8anm4.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2017</dcterms:issued>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.openAccessopenaccesshybrideng
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-1825om6bb8anm4
kops.sourcefieldInternational Journal of Risk Assessment and Management. 2017, <b>20</b>(1-3), pp. 21-45. ISSN 1466-8297. eISSN 1741-5241. Available under: doi: 10.1504/IJRAM.2017.082570deu
kops.sourcefield.plainInternational Journal of Risk Assessment and Management. 2017, 20(1-3), pp. 21-45. ISSN 1466-8297. eISSN 1741-5241. Available under: doi: 10.1504/IJRAM.2017.082570deu
kops.sourcefield.plainInternational Journal of Risk Assessment and Management. 2017, 20(1-3), pp. 21-45. ISSN 1466-8297. eISSN 1741-5241. Available under: doi: 10.1504/IJRAM.2017.082570eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication36e501e4-b8aa-46a8-9514-4a52792e3f9a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery36e501e4-b8aa-46a8-9514-4a52792e3f9a
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage21eng
source.bibliographicInfo.issue1-3eng
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage45eng
source.bibliographicInfo.volume20eng
source.identifier.eissn1741-5241eng
source.identifier.issn1466-8297eng
source.periodicalTitleInternational Journal of Risk Assessment and Managementeng

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Hartung_2-1825om6bb8anm4.pdf
Größe:
334.56 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Beschreibung:
Hartung_2-1825om6bb8anm4.pdf
Hartung_2-1825om6bb8anm4.pdfGröße: 334.56 KBDownloads: 488

Lizenzbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
license.txt
Größe:
3.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Beschreibung:
license.txt
license.txtGröße: 3.88 KBDownloads: 0