Publikation: A green paradox : Validating green choices has ironic effects on behavior, cognition, and perception
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Does validating the purchase of green products hamper subsequent green behaviors in people committed to the identity goal of being green? Positive feedback on purchasing green products led to less recycling compared to negative feedback, with no feedback participants lying in between (Study 1). Assuming that receiving positive feedback on buying green products results in a state of goal completeness, we hypothesized and observed that constructs (e.g., earth) related to being green were the least accessible in positive feedback participants as compared to no feedback and (even more so) to negative feedback participants (Study 2). This pattern of results also emerged with respect to the perception of the color green (i.e., a green patch was perceived the least green by positive feedback participants; Study 3). These findings suggest that being praised for buying green creates a state of goal completeness that hampers subsequent striving for the aspired-to identity goal.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
LONGONI, Chiara, Peter M. GOLLWITZER, Gabriele OETTINGEN, 2014. A green paradox : Validating green choices has ironic effects on behavior, cognition, and perception. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2014, 50, pp. 158-165. ISSN 0022-1031. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.09.010BibTex
@article{Longoni2014green-26277, year={2014}, doi={10.1016/j.jesp.2013.09.010}, title={A green paradox : Validating green choices has ironic effects on behavior, cognition, and perception}, volume={50}, issn={0022-1031}, journal={Journal of Experimental Social Psychology}, pages={158--165}, author={Longoni, Chiara and Gollwitzer, Peter M. and Oettingen, Gabriele} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/26277"> <dcterms:issued>2014</dcterms:issued> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Does validating the purchase of green products hamper subsequent green behaviors in people committed to the identity goal of being green? Positive feedback on purchasing green products led to less recycling compared to negative feedback, with no feedback participants lying in between (Study 1). Assuming that receiving positive feedback on buying green products results in a state of goal completeness, we hypothesized and observed that constructs (e.g., earth) related to being green were the least accessible in positive feedback participants as compared to no feedback and (even more so) to negative feedback participants (Study 2). This pattern of results also emerged with respect to the perception of the color green (i.e., a green patch was perceived the least green by positive feedback participants; Study 3). These findings suggest that being praised for buying green creates a state of goal completeness that hampers subsequent striving for the aspired-to identity goal.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Oettingen, Gabriele</dc:creator> <dcterms:title>A green paradox : Validating green choices has ironic effects on behavior, cognition, and perception</dcterms:title> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Journal of Experimental Social Psychology ; 50 (2014). - S. 158-165</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-02-07T09:35:50Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Longoni, Chiara</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:creator>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Oettingen, Gabriele</dc:contributor> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Gollwitzer, Peter M.</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Longoni, Chiara</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/26277"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-02-07T09:35:50Z</dcterms:available> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>