Shallow Analysis and the Slingshot Argument
| dc.contributor.author | Baumgartner, Michael | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-05-23T10:01:21Z | deu |
| dc.date.available | 2011-05-23T10:01:21Z | deu |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | deu |
| dc.description.abstract | According to the standard opinions in the literature, blocking the unacceptable consequences of the notorious slingshot argument requires imposing constraints on the metaphysics of facts or on theories of definite descriptions (or class abstracts). This paper argues that both of these well-known strategies to rebut the slingshot overshoot the mark. The slingshot, first and foremost, raises the question as to the adequate logical formalization of statements about facts, i.e. of factual contexts. It will be shown that a rigorous application of Quine’s maxim of shallow analysis to formalizations of factual contexts paves the way for an account of formalizing such contexts which blocks the slingshot without ramifications for theories of facts or definite descriptions. | eng |
| dc.description.version | published | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Publ. in: Journal of Philosophical Logic, 39 (2010), 5, pp. 531-556 | deu |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10992-010-9131-9 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/13370 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | deu |
| dc.legacy.dateIssued | 2011-05-23 | deu |
| dc.rights | terms-of-use | deu |
| dc.rights.uri | https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/ | deu |
| dc.subject | Slingshot argument | deu |
| dc.subject | Logical formalization | deu |
| dc.subject | Shallow analysis | deu |
| dc.subject | Factual contexts | deu |
| dc.subject.ddc | 100 | deu |
| dc.title | Shallow Analysis and the Slingshot Argument | eng |
| dc.type | JOURNAL_ARTICLE | deu |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| kops.citation.bibtex | @article{Baumgartner2010Shall-13370,
year={2010},
doi={10.1007/s10992-010-9131-9},
title={Shallow Analysis and the Slingshot Argument},
number={5},
volume={39},
journal={Journal of Philosophical Logic},
pages={531--556},
author={Baumgartner, Michael}
} | |
| kops.citation.iso690 | BAUMGARTNER, Michael, 2010. Shallow Analysis and the Slingshot Argument. In: Journal of Philosophical Logic. 2010, 39(5), pp. 531-556. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s10992-010-9131-9 | deu |
| kops.citation.iso690 | BAUMGARTNER, Michael, 2010. Shallow Analysis and the Slingshot Argument. In: Journal of Philosophical Logic. 2010, 39(5), pp. 531-556. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s10992-010-9131-9 | eng |
| kops.citation.rdf | <rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/13370">
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:contributor>Baumgartner, Michael</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Baumgartner, Michael</dc:creator>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-05-23T10:01:21Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Publ. in: Journal of Philosophical Logic, 39 (2010), 5, pp. 531-556</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
<dcterms:title>Shallow Analysis and the Slingshot Argument</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">According to the standard opinions in the literature, blocking the unacceptable consequences of the notorious slingshot argument requires imposing constraints on the metaphysics of facts or on theories of definite descriptions (or class abstracts). This paper argues that both of these well-known strategies to rebut the slingshot overshoot the mark. The slingshot, first and foremost, raises the question as to the adequate logical formalization of statements about facts, i.e. of factual contexts. It will be shown that a rigorous application of Quine’s maxim of shallow analysis to formalizations of factual contexts paves the way for an account of formalizing such contexts which blocks the slingshot without ramifications for theories of facts or definite descriptions.</dcterms:abstract>
<dcterms:issued>2010</dcterms:issued>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/13370"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-05-23T10:01:21Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> | |
| kops.flag.knbibliography | true | |
| kops.identifier.nbn | urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-133707 | deu |
| kops.sourcefield | Journal of Philosophical Logic. 2010, <b>39</b>(5), pp. 531-556. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s10992-010-9131-9 | deu |
| kops.sourcefield.plain | Journal of Philosophical Logic. 2010, 39(5), pp. 531-556. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s10992-010-9131-9 | deu |
| kops.sourcefield.plain | Journal of Philosophical Logic. 2010, 39(5), pp. 531-556. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s10992-010-9131-9 | eng |
| kops.submitter.email | michael.baumgartner@uni-konstanz.de | deu |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 5b3ad291-3311-4421-a2e2-6962cb01a552 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 5b3ad291-3311-4421-a2e2-6962cb01a552 | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage | 531 | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.issue | 5 | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.toPage | 556 | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.volume | 39 | |
| source.periodicalTitle | Journal of Philosophical Logic |
Dateien
Lizenzbündel
1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
- Name:
- license.txt
- Größe:
- 1.92 KB
- Format:
- Plain Text
- Beschreibung:
