The pragmatics and prosody of variable tag questions in English: Uncovering function-to-form correlations

dc.contributor.authorGómez González, María de los Ángeles
dc.contributor.authorDehé, Nicole
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-03T09:13:58Z
dc.date.available2020-04-03T09:13:58Z
dc.date.issued2020-03eng
dc.description.abstractThis study focuses on variable tag questions (VTQs) in English, e.g. That was Sunday wasn't it?, Don't look back will you?. Our aim is to forge a unified framework to establish marked and unmarked function-to-form correlations integrating other relevant features. This analysis is innovative in approach and coverage. VTQs are classified according to four kinds of stance meaning: epistemic, deontic, attitudinal, and textual. To be able to plot function-to-prosody mappings, four prosodic parameters are included in the analysis (accent position, boundary tone, intonational contour, phrasing). Additional correlations are obtained regarding grammatical characteristics (mood pattern, polarity, position, verb of the tag), dialogic features (type of response, turn taking participation) and contextual information (type of (meta-)genre). Based on the quantitative systematic study of 383 VTQs, tests for statistical significance reveal a number of correlations and interactions. Some confirm or modify previous claims, but all constitute novel contributions to the constructional pragmatics of VTQs in English, most notably the proposal of a model of association of the observed variables.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedde
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pragma.2019.12.006eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/49193
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.subjectVariable tag questions, Stance of tag questions, Prosody of tag questions, Question tageng
dc.subject.ddc400eng
dc.titleThe pragmatics and prosody of variable tag questions in English: Uncovering function-to-form correlationseng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEde
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{GomezGonzalez2020-03pragm-49193,
  year={2020},
  doi={10.1016/j.pragma.2019.12.006},
  title={The pragmatics and prosody of variable tag questions in English: Uncovering function-to-form correlations},
  volume={158},
  issn={0378-2166},
  journal={Journal of Pragmatics},
  pages={33--52},
  author={Gómez González, María de los Ángeles and Dehé, Nicole}
}
kops.citation.iso690GÓMEZ GONZÁLEZ, María de los Ángeles, Nicole DEHÉ, 2020. The pragmatics and prosody of variable tag questions in English: Uncovering function-to-form correlations. In: Journal of Pragmatics. Elsevier. 2020, 158, pp. 33-52. ISSN 0378-2166. eISSN 1879-1387. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.12.006deu
kops.citation.iso690GÓMEZ GONZÁLEZ, María de los Ángeles, Nicole DEHÉ, 2020. The pragmatics and prosody of variable tag questions in English: Uncovering function-to-form correlations. In: Journal of Pragmatics. Elsevier. 2020, 158, pp. 33-52. ISSN 0378-2166. eISSN 1879-1387. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.12.006eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/49193">
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Gómez González, María de los Ángeles</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>The pragmatics and prosody of variable tag questions in English: Uncovering function-to-form correlations</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Dehé, Nicole</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This study focuses on variable tag questions (VTQs) in English, e.g. That was Sunday wasn't it?, Don't look back will you?. Our aim is to forge a unified framework to establish marked and unmarked function-to-form correlations integrating other relevant features. This analysis is innovative in approach and coverage. VTQs are classified according to four kinds of stance meaning: epistemic, deontic, attitudinal, and textual. To be able to plot function-to-prosody mappings, four prosodic parameters are included in the analysis (accent position, boundary tone, intonational contour, phrasing). Additional correlations are obtained regarding grammatical characteristics (mood pattern, polarity, position, verb of the tag), dialogic features (type of response, turn taking participation) and contextual information (type of (meta-)genre). Based on the quantitative systematic study of 383 VTQs, tests for statistical significance reveal a number of correlations and interactions. Some confirm or modify previous claims, but all constitute novel contributions to the constructional pragmatics of VTQs in English, most notably the proposal of a model of association of the observed variables.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:issued>2020-03</dcterms:issued>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/49193"/>
    <dc:creator>Gómez González, María de los Ángeles</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Dehé, Nicole</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-04-03T09:13:58Z</dcterms:available>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-04-03T09:13:58Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedtrueeng
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.sourcefieldJournal of Pragmatics. Elsevier. 2020, <b>158</b>, pp. 33-52. ISSN 0378-2166. eISSN 1879-1387. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.12.006deu
kops.sourcefield.plainJournal of Pragmatics. Elsevier. 2020, 158, pp. 33-52. ISSN 0378-2166. eISSN 1879-1387. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.12.006deu
kops.sourcefield.plainJournal of Pragmatics. Elsevier. 2020, 158, pp. 33-52. ISSN 0378-2166. eISSN 1879-1387. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.12.006eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationbf2dc688-6da8-4143-b7fc-ac0b97218641
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverybf2dc688-6da8-4143-b7fc-ac0b97218641
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage33eng
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage52eng
source.bibliographicInfo.volume158eng
source.identifier.eissn1879-1387eng
source.identifier.issn0378-2166eng
source.periodicalTitleJournal of Pragmaticseng
source.publisherElsevier

Dateien