Trajectories of boredom in self-control demanding tasks

dc.contributor.authorBieleke, Maik
dc.contributor.authorBarton, Leon
dc.contributor.authorWolff, Wanja
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-20T09:00:12Z
dc.date.available2021-04-20T09:00:12Z
dc.date.issued2021-08
dc.description.abstractSelf-control does not always work effectively. Whether this reflects the depletion of a global self-control resource is subject to an ongoing debate. We turned to boredom as a potential confounding variable to advance this debate. In a high-powered experiment (N = 719), participants worked on a primary (transcription) task of varying self-control demands (low, high) and length (2, 4, 8 min), followed by a secondary (Stroop) task with low and high self-control demanding trials. In addition to trait boredom, we measured effort, difficulty, tiredness, frustration, and boredom after the primary task and repeatedly during the secondary task. Effort, difficulty, tiredness, and frustration increased with the demand and duration of the primary task; however, without affecting performance in the secondary task. Importantly, participants rated both the primary and the secondary task as boring, and higher boredom at the state and the trait level was associated with lower effort and higher difficulty, tiredness, and frustration. During the secondary task, boredom increased steadily but was generally lower in more self-control demanding trials. Finally, boredom predicted performance in the secondary task. These results show an intricate relationship between self-control and boredom that research on these two constructs should carefully disentangle.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedeng
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02699931.2021.1901656eng
dc.identifier.pmid33745412eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/53408
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.subject.ddc150eng
dc.titleTrajectories of boredom in self-control demanding taskseng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEeng
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Bieleke2021-08Traje-53408,
  year={2021},
  doi={10.1080/02699931.2021.1901656},
  title={Trajectories of boredom in self-control demanding tasks},
  number={5},
  volume={35},
  issn={0269-9931},
  journal={Cognition & Emotion},
  pages={1018--1028},
  author={Bieleke, Maik and Barton, Leon and Wolff, Wanja}
}
kops.citation.iso690BIELEKE, Maik, Leon BARTON, Wanja WOLFF, 2021. Trajectories of boredom in self-control demanding tasks. In: Cognition & Emotion. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 2021, 35(5), pp. 1018-1028. ISSN 0269-9931. eISSN 1464-0600. Available under: doi: 10.1080/02699931.2021.1901656deu
kops.citation.iso690BIELEKE, Maik, Leon BARTON, Wanja WOLFF, 2021. Trajectories of boredom in self-control demanding tasks. In: Cognition & Emotion. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 2021, 35(5), pp. 1018-1028. ISSN 0269-9931. eISSN 1464-0600. Available under: doi: 10.1080/02699931.2021.1901656eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/53408">
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-04-20T09:00:12Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:title>Trajectories of boredom in self-control demanding tasks</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Wolff, Wanja</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Bieleke, Maik</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Bieleke, Maik</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Self-control does not always work effectively. Whether this reflects the depletion of a global self-control resource is subject to an ongoing debate. We turned to boredom as a potential confounding variable to advance this debate. In a high-powered experiment (N = 719), participants worked on a primary (transcription) task of varying self-control demands (low, high) and length (2, 4, 8 min), followed by a secondary (Stroop) task with low and high self-control demanding trials. In addition to trait boredom, we measured effort, difficulty, tiredness, frustration, and boredom after the primary task and repeatedly during the secondary task. Effort, difficulty, tiredness, and frustration increased with the demand and duration of the primary task; however, without affecting performance in the secondary task. Importantly, participants rated both the primary and the secondary task as boring, and higher boredom at the state and the trait level was associated with lower effort and higher difficulty, tiredness, and frustration. During the secondary task, boredom increased steadily but was generally lower in more self-control demanding trials. Finally, boredom predicted performance in the secondary task. These results show an intricate relationship between self-control and boredom that research on these two constructs should carefully disentangle.</dcterms:abstract>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:contributor>Wolff, Wanja</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2021-08</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-04-20T09:00:12Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/35"/>
    <dc:contributor>Barton, Leon</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Barton, Leon</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/35"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/53408"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedtrueeng
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.sourcefieldCognition & Emotion. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 2021, <b>35</b>(5), pp. 1018-1028. ISSN 0269-9931. eISSN 1464-0600. Available under: doi: 10.1080/02699931.2021.1901656deu
kops.sourcefield.plainCognition & Emotion. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 2021, 35(5), pp. 1018-1028. ISSN 0269-9931. eISSN 1464-0600. Available under: doi: 10.1080/02699931.2021.1901656deu
kops.sourcefield.plainCognition & Emotion. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 2021, 35(5), pp. 1018-1028. ISSN 0269-9931. eISSN 1464-0600. Available under: doi: 10.1080/02699931.2021.1901656eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5b447761-6c37-4a65-ae87-4dac9a0dcf81
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb36d55df-07c3-4b1d-b8ef-534ffe9101aa
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc0e21eef-7f33-43e8-ba18-ca83c3e625d8
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5b447761-6c37-4a65-ae87-4dac9a0dcf81
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage1018
source.bibliographicInfo.issue5
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage1028
source.bibliographicInfo.volume35
source.identifier.eissn1464-0600eng
source.identifier.issn0269-9931eng
source.periodicalTitleCognition & Emotioneng
source.publisherRoutledge, Taylor & Francis Groupeng

Dateien