Publikation: "Wrongful Life" Reloaded : Logico-Empiricism’s Philosophy of Biology 1934/36 (Prague/Paris/Copenhagen) : With historical and political intermezzos
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
I offer a revision (“reload”) of an earlier paper on logicalempiricism’s philosophy of biology by locating its central theses in the context of the international conferences of Prague (1934), Paris (1935), and Copenhagen (1936), so important for the development of logical empiricism and its spread in the Western world. My theses are that logical empiricism did not contribute in the same way to the development of the philosophy of biology, as it did, e.g., to the development of philosophy of mathematics or physics. The reasons for this failure were: (1o ) logical empiricists were largely ignorant of the biological sciences; (2o ) they concentrated on an unproductive (“ideological”) framework (anti-vitalism, reduction) that they took to be the philosophy of biology; (3o ) this prevented them from dealing with actual problems of biological science. Between the various sections of the paper, I insert “intermezzos” that present several conference participants within a wider historical context (i.e., the Great War, persecution, language).
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
WOLTERS, Gereon, 2018. "Wrongful Life" Reloaded : Logico-Empiricism’s Philosophy of Biology 1934/36 (Prague/Paris/Copenhagen) : With historical and political intermezzos. In: Philosophia Scientiæ. 2018, 22(3), pp. 233-255. ISSN 1281-2463. eISSN 1775-4283. Available under: doi: 10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1641BibTex
@article{Wolters2018Wrong-44196, year={2018}, doi={10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1641}, title={"Wrongful Life" Reloaded : Logico-Empiricism’s Philosophy of Biology 1934/36 (Prague/Paris/Copenhagen) : With historical and political intermezzos}, number={3}, volume={22}, issn={1281-2463}, journal={Philosophia Scientiæ}, pages={233--255}, author={Wolters, Gereon} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44196"> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-12-07T14:16:54Z</dc:date> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/44196/3/Wolters_2-1idd1n41tt96s8.pdf"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/44196/3/Wolters_2-1idd1n41tt96s8.pdf"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dcterms:issued>2018</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:title>"Wrongful Life" Reloaded : Logico-Empiricism’s Philosophy of Biology 1934/36 (Prague/Paris/Copenhagen) : With historical and political intermezzos</dcterms:title> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">I offer a revision (“reload”) of an earlier paper on logicalempiricism’s philosophy of biology by locating its central theses in the context of the international conferences of Prague (1934), Paris (1935), and Copenhagen (1936), so important for the development of logical empiricism and its spread in the Western world. My theses are that logical empiricism did not contribute in the same way to the development of the philosophy of biology, as it did, e.g., to the development of philosophy of mathematics or physics. The reasons for this failure were: (1o ) logical empiricists were largely ignorant of the biological sciences; (2o ) they concentrated on an unproductive (“ideological”) framework (anti-vitalism, reduction) that they took to be the philosophy of biology; (3o ) this prevented them from dealing with actual problems of biological science. Between the various sections of the paper, I insert “intermezzos” that present several conference participants within a wider historical context (i.e., the Great War, persecution, language).</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-12-07T14:16:54Z</dcterms:available> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:contributor>Wolters, Gereon</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/44196"/> <dc:creator>Wolters, Gereon</dc:creator> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>