Publikation: Do the wealthy stay healthy? : Rich agreement and verb movement in early English
Lade...
Dateien
Datum
2021
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Gold
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Journal of Historical Syntax. Universität Konstanz. 2021, 5(30). eISSN 2163-6001. Available under: doi: 10.18148/hs/2021.v5i30.77
Zusammenfassung
This paper is a review of the evidence and arguments that have been put forward for a major causal role for the loss of rich agreement in driving changes in verb movement in the history of English. It focuses particularly on Kroch & Taylor (1997), who propose a scenario in which the rise and fall of strict V2 in English is inextricably linked with rich verbal agreement. I provide some reasons to doubt this story: in particular, theories of rich agreement do not make the predictions needed for Kroch & Taylor’s account. Moreover, I show that the distribution of verb movement in historical Englishes is arguably not what would be predicted under any account of rich agreement. Finally, I sketch an alternative account for the loss of verb movement based on developments in the Modern English mood and aspect system.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
400 Sprachwissenschaft, Linguistik
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
WALKDEN, George, 2021. Do the wealthy stay healthy? : Rich agreement and verb movement in early English. In: Journal of Historical Syntax. Universität Konstanz. 2021, 5(30). eISSN 2163-6001. Available under: doi: 10.18148/hs/2021.v5i30.77BibTex
@article{Walkden2021wealt-54990,
year={2021},
doi={10.18148/hs/2021.v5i30.77},
title={Do the wealthy stay healthy? : Rich agreement and verb movement in early English},
number={30},
volume={5},
journal={Journal of Historical Syntax},
author={Walkden, George}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/54990">
<dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
<dcterms:title>Do the wealthy stay healthy? : Rich agreement and verb movement in early English</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-09-23T12:21:49Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/54990/1/Walkden_2-1jlz3oobixgtf4.pdf"/>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/54990/1/Walkden_2-1jlz3oobixgtf4.pdf"/>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/54990"/>
<dc:creator>Walkden, George</dc:creator>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
<dc:contributor>Walkden, George</dc:contributor>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-09-23T12:21:49Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This paper is a review of the evidence and arguments that have been put forward for a major causal role for the loss of rich agreement in driving changes in verb movement in the history of English. It focuses particularly on Kroch & Taylor (1997), who propose a scenario in which the rise and fall of strict V2 in English is inextricably linked with rich verbal agreement. I provide some reasons to doubt this story: in particular, theories of rich agreement do not make the predictions needed for Kroch & Taylor’s account. Moreover, I show that the distribution of verb movement in historical Englishes is arguably not what would be predicted under any account of rich agreement. Finally, I sketch an alternative account for the loss of verb movement based on developments in the Modern English mood and aspect system.</dcterms:abstract>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Begutachtet
Unbekannt
