Do the wealthy stay healthy? : Rich agreement and verb movement in early English

Walkden, George

Do the wealthy stay healthy? : Rich agreement and verb movement in early English

Dateien

Walkden_2-1jlz3oobixgtf4.pdfGröße: 498.25 KBDownloads: 423

Datum

2021

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Gold

Sammlungen

Linguistik

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Journal of Historical Syntax. Universität Konstanz. 2021, 5(30). eISSN 2163-6001. Available under: doi: 10.18148/hs/2021.v5i30.77

Zusammenfassung

This paper is a review of the evidence and arguments that have been put forward for a major causal role for the loss of rich agreement in driving changes in verb movement in the history of English. It focuses particularly on Kroch & Taylor (1997), who propose a scenario in which the rise and fall of strict V2 in English is inextricably linked with rich verbal agreement. I provide some reasons to doubt this story: in particular, theories of rich agreement do not make the predictions needed for Kroch & Taylor’s account. Moreover, I show that the distribution of verb movement in historical Englishes is arguably not what would be predicted under any account of rich agreement. Finally, I sketch an alternative account for the loss of verb movement based on developments in the Modern English mood and aspect system.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

400 Sprachwissenschaft, Linguistik

Zitieren

ISO 690

WALKDEN, George, 2021. Do the wealthy stay healthy? : Rich agreement and verb movement in early English. In: Journal of Historical Syntax. Universität Konstanz. 2021, 5(30). eISSN 2163-6001. Available under: doi: 10.18148/hs/2021.v5i30.77

BibTex

@article{Walkden2021wealt-54990,
  year={2021},
  doi={10.18148/hs/2021.v5i30.77},
  title={Do the wealthy stay healthy? : Rich agreement and verb movement in early English},
  number={30},
  volume={5},
  journal={Journal of Historical Syntax},
  author={Walkden, George}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/54990">
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:title>Do the wealthy stay healthy? : Rich agreement and verb movement in early English</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-09-23T12:21:49Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/54990/1/Walkden_2-1jlz3oobixgtf4.pdf"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/54990/1/Walkden_2-1jlz3oobixgtf4.pdf"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/54990"/>
    <dc:creator>Walkden, George</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <dc:contributor>Walkden, George</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-09-23T12:21:49Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This paper is a review of the evidence and arguments that have been put forward for a major causal role for the loss of rich agreement in driving changes in verb movement in the history of English. It focuses particularly on Kroch &amp; Taylor (1997), who propose a scenario in which the rise and fall of strict V2 in English is inextricably linked with rich verbal agreement. I provide some reasons to doubt this story: in particular, theories of rich agreement do not make the predictions needed for Kroch &amp; Taylor’s account. Moreover, I show that the distribution of verb movement in historical Englishes is arguably not what would be predicted under any account of rich agreement. Finally, I sketch an alternative account for the loss of verb movement based on developments in the Modern English mood and aspect system.</dcterms:abstract>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Begutachtet

Unbekannt