Solidarity with whom? : why Trade Unions are losing ground in Continental Pension Politics

dc.contributor.authorHäusermann, Silja
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T09:47:17Zdeu
dc.date.available2011-10-26T09:47:17Zdeu
dc.date.issued2010
dc.description.abstractThis article explains why the power of organised labour in the reform of Swiss and German pension regimes has faded over the last three decades. Postindustrialisation has brought two different sets of reform issues onto the pension policy agendas of Continental European welfare states: retrenchment of existing benefit levels, and the pension coverage of new, postindustrial social risk groups. Recent pension reforms increasingly combine these two types of measures in encompassing policy packages--‘modernising compromises'--in order to compensate for retrenchment with selective expansive reform elements. Continental trade unions attach a lower importance to postindustrial modernisation than do the left-wing parties--notably the Social Democrats and the Green parties. Consequently, the distance between the labour movement and the left-wing parties, as well as intra-labour heterogeneity, increase and ‘modernising compromises’ tend to divide the left and to marginalise trade unions. The empirical analysis relies on coded actor positions from eight major pension reforms between 1972 and 2003.eng
dc.description.versionpublished
dc.identifier.citationPubl. in: European Journal of Political Research ; 49 (2010), 2. - S. 223-256deu
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01896.xdeu
dc.identifier.urihttp://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/16290
dc.language.isoengdeu
dc.legacy.dateIssued2011-10-26deu
dc.rightsterms-of-usedeu
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/deu
dc.subject.ddc320deu
dc.titleSolidarity with whom? : why Trade Unions are losing ground in Continental Pension Politicseng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEdeu
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Hausermann2010Solid-16290,
  year={2010},
  doi={10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01896.x},
  title={Solidarity with whom? : why Trade Unions are losing ground in Continental Pension Politics},
  number={2},
  volume={49},
  issn={0304-4130},
  journal={European Journal of Political Research},
  pages={223--256},
  author={Häusermann, Silja}
}
kops.citation.iso690HÄUSERMANN, Silja, 2010. Solidarity with whom? : why Trade Unions are losing ground in Continental Pension Politics. In: European Journal of Political Research. 2010, 49(2), pp. 223-256. ISSN 0304-4130. Available under: doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01896.xdeu
kops.citation.iso690HÄUSERMANN, Silja, 2010. Solidarity with whom? : why Trade Unions are losing ground in Continental Pension Politics. In: European Journal of Political Research. 2010, 49(2), pp. 223-256. ISSN 0304-4130. Available under: doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01896.xeng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/16290">
    <dc:creator>Häusermann, Silja</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/16290"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2010</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Häusermann, Silja</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Publ. in: European Journal of Political Research ; 49 (2010), 2. - S. 223-256</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-10-26T09:47:17Z</dc:date>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-10-26T09:47:17Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:title>Solidarity with whom? : why Trade Unions are losing ground in Continental Pension Politics</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This article explains why the power of organised labour in the reform of Swiss and German pension regimes has faded over the last three decades. Postindustrialisation has brought two different sets of reform issues onto the pension policy agendas of Continental European welfare states: retrenchment of existing benefit levels, and the pension coverage of new, postindustrial social risk groups. Recent pension reforms increasingly combine these two types of measures in encompassing policy packages--‘modernising compromises'--in order to compensate for retrenchment with selective expansive reform elements. Continental trade unions attach a lower importance to postindustrial modernisation than do the left-wing parties--notably the Social Democrats and the Green parties. Consequently, the distance between the labour movement and the left-wing parties, as well as intra-labour heterogeneity, increase and ‘modernising compromises’ tend to divide the left and to marginalise trade unions. The empirical analysis relies on coded actor positions from eight major pension reforms between 1972 and 2003.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.flag.knbibliographyfalse
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-162905deu
kops.sourcefieldEuropean Journal of Political Research. 2010, <b>49</b>(2), pp. 223-256. ISSN 0304-4130. Available under: doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01896.xdeu
kops.sourcefield.plainEuropean Journal of Political Research. 2010, 49(2), pp. 223-256. ISSN 0304-4130. Available under: doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01896.xdeu
kops.sourcefield.plainEuropean Journal of Political Research. 2010, 49(2), pp. 223-256. ISSN 0304-4130. Available under: doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01896.xeng
kops.submitter.emailtobias.2.zimmermann@uni-konstanz.dedeu
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb32a1d97-3a0c-49a8-8358-53ca7a57de1b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryb32a1d97-3a0c-49a8-8358-53ca7a57de1b
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage223
source.bibliographicInfo.issue2
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage256
source.bibliographicInfo.volume49
source.identifier.issn0304-4130
source.periodicalTitleEuropean Journal of Political Research

Dateien

Lizenzbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
license.txt
Größe:
1.92 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Beschreibung:
license.txt
license.txtGröße: 1.92 KBDownloads: 0