Morphological sexing of passerines : not valid over larger geographical scales

dc.contributor.authorEllrich, Heike
dc.contributor.authorSalewski, Volker
dc.contributor.authorFiedler, Wolfgang
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-26T10:22:42Z
dc.date.available2020-10-26T10:22:42Z
dc.date.issued2010-04eng
dc.description.abstractSex determination of birds is important for many ecological studies but is often difficult in species with monomorphic plumage. Morphology often provides a possibility for sex determination, but the characters need to be verified. We tested whether five passerine species can be sexed according to standard morphological measurements applying a forward logistic regression with sex determined by molecular analysis as the dependent variable. Furthermore, we tested whether the results can be used on a larger geographic scale by applying morphological sexing methods gained by similar studies from other regions to our data set. Of the five species of this study only Garden Warblers Sylvia borin could not be sexed morphologically. In the Robin Erithacus rubecula, 87.2% of all individuals were sexed correctly. For Reed Warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus, Willow Warblers Phylloscopus trochilus and Reed Buntings Emberiza schoeniclus, the respective values were 77.6, 89.4 and 86.4%. When the logistic regression functions from similar studies on Robins and Reed Buntings in Denmark and Scotland were applied to the birds from south-western Germany, they performed less well compared to the original dataset of these studies and compared to the logistic regression function of our own study. The same was the case for Willow Warblers when a wing length criterion used in Great Britain was applied to the birds of our study. These discrepancies may have several explanations: (1) the models are optimised for the dataset from which they were extracted, (2) inter-ringer variation in measurements, (3) the use of different age cohorts, (4) different morphology due to different habitat availability around the study site, or, most likely, (5) different morphology due to different migratory behaviour. We recommend that morphological sex differentiation methods similar to this study (1) be only used population specific, (2) only with one age cohort and (3) to adjust the extracted equations from time to time.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedeng
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10336-009-0478-zeng
dc.identifier.ppn1736574981
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/51463
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/
dc.subjectPasserines, Morphology, Sex determination, PCReng
dc.subject.ddc570eng
dc.titleMorphological sexing of passerines : not valid over larger geographical scaleseng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEeng
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Ellrich2010-04Morph-51463,
  year={2010},
  doi={10.1007/s10336-009-0478-z},
  title={Morphological sexing of passerines : not valid over larger geographical scales},
  number={2},
  volume={151},
  issn={0021-8375},
  journal={Journal of Ornithology},
  pages={449--458},
  author={Ellrich, Heike and Salewski, Volker and Fiedler, Wolfgang}
}
kops.citation.iso690ELLRICH, Heike, Volker SALEWSKI, Wolfgang FIEDLER, 2010. Morphological sexing of passerines : not valid over larger geographical scales. In: Journal of Ornithology. Springer. 2010, 151(2), pp. 449-458. ISSN 0021-8375. eISSN 1439-0361. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s10336-009-0478-zdeu
kops.citation.iso690ELLRICH, Heike, Volker SALEWSKI, Wolfgang FIEDLER, 2010. Morphological sexing of passerines : not valid over larger geographical scales. In: Journal of Ornithology. Springer. 2010, 151(2), pp. 449-458. ISSN 0021-8375. eISSN 1439-0361. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s10336-009-0478-zeng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/51463">
    <dc:creator>Ellrich, Heike</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Salewski, Volker</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Ellrich, Heike</dc:contributor>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-10-26T10:22:42Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Salewski, Volker</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Fiedler, Wolfgang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-10-26T10:22:42Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Sex determination of birds is important for many ecological studies but is often difficult in species with monomorphic plumage. Morphology often provides a possibility for sex determination, but the characters need to be verified. We tested whether five passerine species can be sexed according to standard morphological measurements applying a forward logistic regression with sex determined by molecular analysis as the dependent variable. Furthermore, we tested whether the results can be used on a larger geographic scale by applying morphological sexing methods gained by similar studies from other regions to our data set. Of the five species of this study only Garden Warblers Sylvia borin could not be sexed morphologically. In the Robin Erithacus rubecula, 87.2% of all individuals were sexed correctly. For Reed Warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus, Willow Warblers Phylloscopus trochilus and Reed Buntings Emberiza schoeniclus, the respective values were 77.6, 89.4 and 86.4%. When the logistic regression functions from similar studies on Robins and Reed Buntings in Denmark and Scotland were applied to the birds from south-western Germany, they performed less well compared to the original dataset of these studies and compared to the logistic regression function of our own study. The same was the case for Willow Warblers when a wing length criterion used in Great Britain was applied to the birds of our study. These discrepancies may have several explanations: (1) the models are optimised for the dataset from which they were extracted, (2) inter-ringer variation in measurements, (3) the use of different age cohorts, (4) different morphology due to different habitat availability around the study site, or, most likely, (5) different morphology due to different migratory behaviour. We recommend that morphological sex differentiation methods similar to this study (1) be only used population specific, (2) only with one age cohort and (3) to adjust the extracted equations from time to time.</dcterms:abstract>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/51463/1/Ellrich_2-1l8xcmaey8q3i6.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:title>Morphological sexing of passerines : not valid over larger geographical scales</dcterms:title>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2010-04</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/51463"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/51463/1/Ellrich_2-1l8xcmaey8q3i6.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Fiedler, Wolfgang</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.openAccessopenaccesshybrideng
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedtrueeng
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-1l8xcmaey8q3i6
kops.sourcefieldJournal of Ornithology. Springer. 2010, <b>151</b>(2), pp. 449-458. ISSN 0021-8375. eISSN 1439-0361. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s10336-009-0478-zdeu
kops.sourcefield.plainJournal of Ornithology. Springer. 2010, 151(2), pp. 449-458. ISSN 0021-8375. eISSN 1439-0361. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s10336-009-0478-zdeu
kops.sourcefield.plainJournal of Ornithology. Springer. 2010, 151(2), pp. 449-458. ISSN 0021-8375. eISSN 1439-0361. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s10336-009-0478-zeng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5c49cae0-42a9-45cc-bfde-bc5a5e628fb0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5c49cae0-42a9-45cc-bfde-bc5a5e628fb0
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage449eng
source.bibliographicInfo.issue2eng
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage458eng
source.bibliographicInfo.volume151eng
source.identifier.eissn1439-0361eng
source.identifier.issn0021-8375eng
source.periodicalTitleJournal of Ornithologyeng
source.publisherSpringereng

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Ellrich_2-1l8xcmaey8q3i6.pdf
Größe:
429.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Beschreibung:
Ellrich_2-1l8xcmaey8q3i6.pdf
Ellrich_2-1l8xcmaey8q3i6.pdfGröße: 429.42 KBDownloads: 202

Lizenzbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
license.txt
Größe:
3.96 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Beschreibung:
license.txt
license.txtGröße: 3.96 KBDownloads: 0