Publikation: Comparison of Different Test Construction Strategies in the Development of a Gender Fair Interest Inventory Using Verbs
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Three test construction strategies are described and illustrated in the development of the Verb Interest Test (VIT), an inventory that assesses vocational interests using verbs. Verbs might be a promising alternative to the descriptions of occupational activities used in most vocational interest inventories because they are context-independent, timesaving, and applicable across educational levels. Three test construction strategies are implemented and compared. The first construction method follows the rules of classical test theory (CTT), the second is within the framework of CTT as well but also takes gender differences in mean scores into account, and the third strategy is guided by item response theory (IRT) and controls for differential item functioning for men and women. The three VIT versions resulting from the different construction methods are compared regarding their construct and criterion validity. For practical use and career counseling, test development following the IRT approach seems most useful since it allows maximal occupational exploration and precise trait estimation.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
WETZEL, Eunike, Benedikt HELL, Katja PÄSSLER, 2012. Comparison of Different Test Construction Strategies in the Development of a Gender Fair Interest Inventory Using Verbs. In: Journal of Career Assessment. 2012, 20(1), pp. 88-104. ISSN 1069-0727. eISSN 1552-4590. Available under: doi: 10.1177/1069072711417166BibTex
@article{Wetzel2012-02Compa-49122, year={2012}, doi={10.1177/1069072711417166}, title={Comparison of Different Test Construction Strategies in the Development of a Gender Fair Interest Inventory Using Verbs}, number={1}, volume={20}, issn={1069-0727}, journal={Journal of Career Assessment}, pages={88--104}, author={Wetzel, Eunike and Hell, Benedikt and Päßler, Katja} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/49122"> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:title>Comparison of Different Test Construction Strategies in the Development of a Gender Fair Interest Inventory Using Verbs</dcterms:title> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:creator>Päßler, Katja</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Wetzel, Eunike</dc:creator> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:contributor>Wetzel, Eunike</dc:contributor> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-03-23T10:01:27Z</dc:date> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Three test construction strategies are described and illustrated in the development of the Verb Interest Test (VIT), an inventory that assesses vocational interests using verbs. Verbs might be a promising alternative to the descriptions of occupational activities used in most vocational interest inventories because they are context-independent, timesaving, and applicable across educational levels. Three test construction strategies are implemented and compared. The first construction method follows the rules of classical test theory (CTT), the second is within the framework of CTT as well but also takes gender differences in mean scores into account, and the third strategy is guided by item response theory (IRT) and controls for differential item functioning for men and women. The three VIT versions resulting from the different construction methods are compared regarding their construct and criterion validity. For practical use and career counseling, test development following the IRT approach seems most useful since it allows maximal occupational exploration and precise trait estimation.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Hell, Benedikt</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2012-02</dcterms:issued> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/49122"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-03-23T10:01:27Z</dcterms:available> <dc:contributor>Päßler, Katja</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Hell, Benedikt</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>