Publikation: Consensus recommendations on how to assess the quality of surgical interventions
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Postoperative complications represent a major public health burden worldwide. Without standardized, clinically relevant and universally applied endpoints, the evaluation of surgical interventions remains ill-defined and inconsistent, opening the door for biased interpretations and hampering patient-centered health care delivery. We conducted a Jury-based consensus conference incorporating the perspectives of different stakeholders, who based their recommendations on the work of nine panels of experts. The recommendations cover the selection of postoperative outcomes from the perspective of patients and other stakeholders, comparison and interpretation of outcomes, consideration of cultural and demographic factors, and strategies to deal with unwarranted outcomes. With the recommendations developed exclusively by the Jury, we provide a framework for surgical outcome assessment and quality improvement after medical interventions, that integrates the main stakeholders’ perspectives.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
DOMENGHINO, Anja, Carmen WALBERT, Dominique Lisa BIRRER, Milo A. PUHAN, Pierre-Alain CLAVIEN, THE OUTCOME4MEDICINE CONSENSUS GROUP, Frank URBANIOK, 2023. Consensus recommendations on how to assess the quality of surgical interventions. In: Nature Medicine. Springer. 2023, 29(4), S. 811-822. ISSN 1078-8956. eISSN 1546-170X. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02237-3BibTex
@article{Domenghino2023-04Conse-74041,
title={Consensus recommendations on how to assess the quality of surgical interventions},
year={2023},
doi={10.1038/s41591-023-02237-3},
number={4},
volume={29},
issn={1078-8956},
journal={Nature Medicine},
pages={811--822},
author={Domenghino, Anja and Walbert, Carmen and Birrer, Dominique Lisa and Puhan, Milo A. and Clavien, Pierre-Alain and The Outcome4Medicine consensus group and Urbaniok, Frank}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/74041">
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-07-18T11:08:28Z</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Walbert, Carmen</dc:contributor>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:creator>Clavien, Pierre-Alain</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Domenghino, Anja</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Puhan, Milo A.</dc:contributor>
<dc:contributor>Urbaniok, Frank</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:title>Consensus recommendations on how to assess the quality of surgical interventions</dcterms:title>
<dc:creator>Birrer, Dominique Lisa</dc:creator>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-07-18T11:08:28Z</dcterms:available>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/74041"/>
<dc:creator>Puhan, Milo A.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Urbaniok, Frank</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>The Outcome4Medicine consensus group</dc:creator>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
<dcterms:abstract>Postoperative complications represent a major public health burden worldwide. Without standardized, clinically relevant and universally applied endpoints, the evaluation of surgical interventions remains ill-defined and inconsistent, opening the door for biased interpretations and hampering patient-centered health care delivery. We conducted a Jury-based consensus conference incorporating the perspectives of different stakeholders, who based their recommendations on the work of nine panels of experts. The recommendations cover the selection of postoperative outcomes from the perspective of patients and other stakeholders, comparison and interpretation of outcomes, consideration of cultural and demographic factors, and strategies to deal with unwarranted outcomes. With the recommendations developed exclusively by the Jury, we provide a framework for surgical outcome assessment and quality improvement after medical interventions, that integrates the main stakeholders’ perspectives.</dcterms:abstract>
<dcterms:issued>2023-04</dcterms:issued>
<dc:contributor>Clavien, Pierre-Alain</dc:contributor>
<dc:contributor>Birrer, Dominique Lisa</dc:contributor>
<dc:contributor>Domenghino, Anja</dc:contributor>
<dc:contributor>The Outcome4Medicine consensus group</dc:contributor>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Walbert, Carmen</dc:creator>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>