Optimal Allocation Ratios : A Square Root Relationship between the Ratios of Symbiotic Costs and Benefits

dc.contributor.authorSteidinger, Brian S.
dc.contributor.authorPeay, Kabir G.
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-24T06:30:58Z
dc.date.available2021-09-24T06:30:58Z
dc.date.issued2021-10
dc.description.abstractAll organisms struggle to make sense of environmental stimuli in order to maximize their fitness. For animals, the responses of single cells and superorganisms to stimuli are generally proportional to stimulus ratios, a phenomenon described by Weber’s law. However, Weber’s law has not yet been used to predict how plants respond to stimuli generated from their symbiotic partners. Here we develop a model for quantitatively predicting the ratios of carbon (C) allocation to symbionts that provide nutrients to their plant host. Consistent with Weber’s law, our model demonstrates that the optimal ratio of resources allocated to a less beneficial relative to a more beneficial symbiont scale to the ratio of the growth benefits of the two strains. As C allocation to symbionts increases, the ratio of C allocation to two strains approaches the square root of the ratio of symbiotic growth benefits (e.g., a worse symbiont providing one-fourth the benefits gets 1/4=1/2 the C of a better symbiont). We document a compelling correspondence between our square root model prediction and a meta-analysis of experimental literature on C allocation. This type of preferential allocation can promote coexistence between more beneficial and less beneficial symbionts, offering a potential mechanism behind the high diversity of microbial symbionts observed in nature.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedde
dc.identifier.doi10.1086/716182eng
dc.identifier.pmid34559611
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/55000
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.subject.ddc570eng
dc.titleOptimal Allocation Ratios : A Square Root Relationship between the Ratios of Symbiotic Costs and Benefitseng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEde
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Steidinger2021-10Optim-55000,
  title={Optimal Allocation Ratios : A Square Root Relationship between the Ratios of Symbiotic Costs and Benefits},
  year={2021},
  doi={10.1086/716182},
  number={4},
  volume={198},
  issn={0003-0147},
  journal={The American Naturalist},
  pages={460--472},
  author={Steidinger, Brian S. and Peay, Kabir G.}
}
kops.citation.iso690STEIDINGER, Brian S., Kabir G. PEAY, 2021. Optimal Allocation Ratios : A Square Root Relationship between the Ratios of Symbiotic Costs and Benefits. In: The American Naturalist. University of Chicago Press. 2021, 198(4), S. 460-472. ISSN 0003-0147. eISSN 1537-5323. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1086/716182deu
kops.citation.iso690STEIDINGER, Brian S., Kabir G. PEAY, 2021. Optimal Allocation Ratios : A Square Root Relationship between the Ratios of Symbiotic Costs and Benefits. In: The American Naturalist. University of Chicago Press. 2021, 198(4), pp. 460-472. ISSN 0003-0147. eISSN 1537-5323. Available under: doi: 10.1086/716182eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/55000">
    <dc:contributor>Steidinger, Brian S.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>Optimal Allocation Ratios : A Square Root Relationship between the Ratios of Symbiotic Costs and Benefits</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-09-24T06:30:58Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">All organisms struggle to make sense of environmental stimuli in order to maximize their fitness. For animals, the responses of single cells and superorganisms to stimuli are generally proportional to stimulus ratios, a phenomenon described by Weber’s law. However, Weber’s law has not yet been used to predict how plants respond to stimuli generated from their symbiotic partners. Here we develop a model for quantitatively predicting the ratios of carbon (C) allocation to symbionts that provide nutrients to their plant host. Consistent with Weber’s law, our model demonstrates that the optimal ratio of resources allocated to a less beneficial relative to a more beneficial symbiont scale to the ratio of the growth benefits of the two strains. As C allocation to symbionts increases, the ratio of C allocation to two strains approaches the square root of the ratio of symbiotic growth benefits (e.g., a worse symbiont providing one-fourth the benefits gets 1/4=1/2 the C of a better symbiont). We document a compelling correspondence between our square root model prediction and a meta-analysis of experimental literature on C allocation. This type of preferential allocation can promote coexistence between more beneficial and less beneficial symbionts, offering a potential mechanism behind the high diversity of microbial symbionts observed in nature.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Peay, Kabir G.</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Steidinger, Brian S.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Peay, Kabir G.</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/55000"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2021-10</dcterms:issued>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-09-24T06:30:58Z</dc:date>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedtrueeng
kops.sourcefieldThe American Naturalist. University of Chicago Press. 2021, <b>198</b>(4), S. 460-472. ISSN 0003-0147. eISSN 1537-5323. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1086/716182deu
kops.sourcefield.plainThe American Naturalist. University of Chicago Press. 2021, 198(4), S. 460-472. ISSN 0003-0147. eISSN 1537-5323. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1086/716182deu
kops.sourcefield.plainThe American Naturalist. University of Chicago Press. 2021, 198(4), pp. 460-472. ISSN 0003-0147. eISSN 1537-5323. Available under: doi: 10.1086/716182eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7d93ab4a-c395-4d4e-9e29-ddaa068c8e11
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery7d93ab4a-c395-4d4e-9e29-ddaa068c8e11
relation.isDatasetOfPublication79411380-17a3-4c78-83d6-61ebedb4a0c7
relation.isDatasetOfPublication.latestForDiscovery79411380-17a3-4c78-83d6-61ebedb4a0c7
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage460
source.bibliographicInfo.issue4
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage472
source.bibliographicInfo.volume198
source.identifier.eissn1537-5323eng
source.identifier.issn0003-0147eng
source.periodicalTitleThe American Naturalisteng
source.publisherUniversity of Chicago Presseng

Dateien