Between equal rights force decides? : Contested place-making and the right to the city

dc.contributor.authorBodirsky, Katharina
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-27T10:26:55Z
dc.date.available2018-02-27T10:26:55Z
dc.date.issued2017eng
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a sympathetic critique of a right to the city perspective that sets up a binary between city inhabitants who actively produce and appropriate city space for its use value as opposed to those who expropriate urban space for realizing exchange value. It suggests that this tends to gloss over the actual divisions among users of city space and their complicity with forces of capital and the state that constitute real limits for the urban revolution that the right to the city envisions. It then argues that an analytics of contested place-making, including practices of commoning, can both include the central conflict that is important to the rights to the city perspective and overcome the limitations of a rights framework.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedeng
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13604813.2017.1374773eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/41611
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.subjectright to the city, place, place-making, urban commons, commoningeng
dc.subject.ddc300eng
dc.titleBetween equal rights force decides? : Contested place-making and the right to the cityeng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEeng
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Bodirsky2017Betwe-41611,
  year={2017},
  doi={10.1080/13604813.2017.1374773},
  title={Between equal rights force decides? : Contested place-making and the right to the city},
  number={5},
  volume={21},
  issn={1360-4813},
  journal={City : Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action},
  pages={672--681},
  author={Bodirsky, Katharina}
}
kops.citation.iso690BODIRSKY, Katharina, 2017. Between equal rights force decides? : Contested place-making and the right to the city. In: City : Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action. 2017, 21(5), pp. 672-681. ISSN 1360-4813. eISSN 1470-3629. Available under: doi: 10.1080/13604813.2017.1374773deu
kops.citation.iso690BODIRSKY, Katharina, 2017. Between equal rights force decides? : Contested place-making and the right to the city. In: City : Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action. 2017, 21(5), pp. 672-681. ISSN 1360-4813. eISSN 1470-3629. Available under: doi: 10.1080/13604813.2017.1374773eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/41611">
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-02-27T10:26:55Z</dcterms:available>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2017</dcterms:issued>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/41611"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-02-27T10:26:55Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This paper presents a sympathetic critique of a right to the city perspective that sets up a binary between city inhabitants who actively produce and appropriate city space for its use value as opposed to those who expropriate urban space for realizing exchange value. It suggests that this tends to gloss over the actual divisions among users of city space and their complicity with forces of capital and the state that constitute real limits for the urban revolution that the right to the city envisions. It then argues that an analytics of contested place-making, including practices of commoning, can both include the central conflict that is important to the rights to the city perspective and overcome the limitations of a rights framework.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
    <dc:creator>Bodirsky, Katharina</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Bodirsky, Katharina</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:title>Between equal rights force decides? : Contested place-making and the right to the city</dcterms:title>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.sourcefieldCity : Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action. 2017, <b>21</b>(5), pp. 672-681. ISSN 1360-4813. eISSN 1470-3629. Available under: doi: 10.1080/13604813.2017.1374773deu
kops.sourcefield.plainCity : Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action. 2017, 21(5), pp. 672-681. ISSN 1360-4813. eISSN 1470-3629. Available under: doi: 10.1080/13604813.2017.1374773deu
kops.sourcefield.plainCity : Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action. 2017, 21(5), pp. 672-681. ISSN 1360-4813. eISSN 1470-3629. Available under: doi: 10.1080/13604813.2017.1374773eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9602582d-002e-4338-8cee-6ff39e9a639a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery9602582d-002e-4338-8cee-6ff39e9a639a
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage672eng
source.bibliographicInfo.issue5eng
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage681eng
source.bibliographicInfo.volume21eng
source.identifier.eissn1470-3629eng
source.identifier.issn1360-4813eng
source.periodicalTitleCity : Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Actioneng

Dateien