Evidence that the aesthetic preference for Hogarth's Line of Beauty is an evolutionary by-product

dc.contributor.authorHübner, Ronald
dc.contributor.authorLewis, David M. G.
dc.contributor.authorAl-Shawaf, Laith
dc.contributor.authorSemchenko, Ayten Yesim
dc.contributor.authorFlores, Jonathon
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-20T07:39:14Z
dc.date.available2023-03-20T07:39:14Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractIn 1753, artist William Hogarth declared a specific S-shaped line to be the ‘Line of Beauty’ (LoB). Hogarth’s assertion has had a profound impact on diverse fields over the past two and a half centuries. However, only one recent (2022) study has investigated whether Hogarth’s assertion accurately captures humans’ actual aesthetic preferences, and no research has explored why people find the LoB beautiful. We conducted two studies testing the hypothesis that the LoB’s perceived beauty is an incidental by-product of cognitive systems that evolved to attend to fitness-relevant morphological features in people. In Study 1, we replicated the finding that female bodies whose lumbar curvature approximates the biomechanical optimum for dealing with the exigencies of pregnancy are rated as more attractive. In Study 2, we found that abstract lines extracted from these bodies were perceived as more beautiful than other lines. These results suggest that the preference for Hogarth’s LoB is an incidental by-product of psychological mechanisms that evolved for other purposes. More broadly, these findings suggest that an evolutionary psychological approach – in particular the concept of evolutionary by-product – may be useful for understanding, explaining, and predicting people’s aesthetic preferences for certain abstract symbols, which otherwise might seem arbitrary and inexplicable.
dc.description.versionpublisheddeu
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-023-31175-w
dc.identifier.ppn1839548339
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/66444
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.uriSuppData Study data:
https://osf.io/qdse6/?view_only=73b3b9277b0048f0ae308339226adc8b
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc150
dc.titleEvidence that the aesthetic preference for Hogarth's Line of Beauty is an evolutionary by-producteng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLE
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Hubner2023Evide-66444,
  year={2023},
  doi={10.1038/s41598-023-31175-w},
  title={Evidence that the aesthetic preference for Hogarth's Line of Beauty is an evolutionary by-product},
  volume={13},
  journal={Scientific Reports},
  author={Hübner, Ronald and Lewis, David M. G. and Al-Shawaf, Laith and Semchenko, Ayten Yesim and Flores, Jonathon},
  note={Article Number: 4134}
}
kops.citation.iso690HÜBNER, Ronald, David M. G. LEWIS, Laith AL-SHAWAF, Ayten Yesim SEMCHENKO, Jonathon FLORES, 2023. Evidence that the aesthetic preference for Hogarth's Line of Beauty is an evolutionary by-product. In: Scientific Reports. Springer. 2023, 13, 4134. eISSN 2045-2322. Available under: doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31175-wdeu
kops.citation.iso690HÜBNER, Ronald, David M. G. LEWIS, Laith AL-SHAWAF, Ayten Yesim SEMCHENKO, Jonathon FLORES, 2023. Evidence that the aesthetic preference for Hogarth's Line of Beauty is an evolutionary by-product. In: Scientific Reports. Springer. 2023, 13, 4134. eISSN 2045-2322. Available under: doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31175-weng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/66444">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:creator>Al-Shawaf, Laith</dc:creator>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/66444/1/Huebner_2-1tfgp5g4a6hw61.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:contributor>Flores, Jonathon</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/66444/1/Huebner_2-1tfgp5g4a6hw61.pdf"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/66444"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:contributor>Al-Shawaf, Laith</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Flores, Jonathon</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:creator>Hübner, Ronald</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Lewis, David M. G.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>Evidence that the aesthetic preference for Hogarth's Line of Beauty is an evolutionary by-product</dcterms:title>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Semchenko, Ayten Yesim</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract>In 1753, artist William Hogarth declared a specific S-shaped line to be the ‘Line of Beauty’ (LoB). Hogarth’s assertion has had a profound impact on diverse fields over the past two and a half centuries. However, only one recent (2022) study has investigated whether Hogarth’s assertion accurately captures humans’ actual aesthetic preferences, and no research has explored why people find the LoB beautiful. We conducted two studies testing the hypothesis that the LoB’s perceived beauty is an incidental by-product of cognitive systems that evolved to attend to fitness-relevant morphological features in people. In Study 1, we replicated the finding that female bodies whose lumbar curvature approximates the biomechanical optimum for dealing with the exigencies of pregnancy are rated as more attractive. In Study 2, we found that abstract lines extracted from these bodies were perceived as more beautiful than other lines. These results suggest that the preference for Hogarth’s LoB is an incidental by-product of psychological mechanisms that evolved for other purposes. More broadly, these findings suggest that an evolutionary psychological approach – in particular the concept of evolutionary by-product – may be useful for understanding, explaining, and predicting people’s aesthetic preferences for certain abstract symbols, which otherwise might seem arbitrary and inexplicable.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:issued>2023</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-03-20T07:39:14Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Hübner, Ronald</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Lewis, David M. G.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Semchenko, Ayten Yesim</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-03-20T07:39:14Z</dc:date>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.openAccessopenaccessgold
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedtrue
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-1tfgp5g4a6hw61
kops.sourcefieldScientific Reports. Springer. 2023, <b>13</b>, 4134. eISSN 2045-2322. Available under: doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31175-wdeu
kops.sourcefield.plainScientific Reports. Springer. 2023, 13, 4134. eISSN 2045-2322. Available under: doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31175-wdeu
kops.sourcefield.plainScientific Reports. Springer. 2023, 13, 4134. eISSN 2045-2322. Available under: doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31175-weng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication07b579ce-8e8b-440d-8a4c-a6d3e0441783
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery07b579ce-8e8b-440d-8a4c-a6d3e0441783
source.bibliographicInfo.articleNumber4134
source.bibliographicInfo.volume13
source.identifier.eissn2045-2322
source.periodicalTitleScientific Reports
source.publisherSpringer

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Huebner_2-1tfgp5g4a6hw61.pdf
Größe:
1.94 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Huebner_2-1tfgp5g4a6hw61.pdf
Huebner_2-1tfgp5g4a6hw61.pdfGröße: 1.94 MBDownloads: 138

Lizenzbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
license.txt
Größe:
3.96 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Beschreibung:
license.txt
license.txtGröße: 3.96 KBDownloads: 0