Disparity of motorcycle helmet use in Nepal : Weak law enforcement or riders' reluctance?

dc.contributor.authorSiebert, Felix Wilhelm
dc.contributor.authorHellmann, Lennart
dc.contributor.authorPant, Puspa Raj
dc.contributor.authorLin, Hanhe
dc.contributor.authorTrimpop, Rüdiger
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-01T07:24:52Z
dc.date.available2021-06-01T07:24:52Z
dc.date.issued2021eng
dc.description.abstractLike many low- and middle-income countries, Nepal is experiencing a massive motorization, predominantly from increased use of motorcycles which is driving a surge in road-related injuries and fatalities. Motorcycles and their riders have been identified as a focal point for road traffic injury prevention measures. While helmet use is mandatory for both motorcycle drivers and passengers, fines for helmet non-use are only levied on drivers, not on passengers, and it is unclear how this unequal enforcement translates to helmet use rates in Nepal. Hence, a video-based observation on motorcyclists’ helmet use was conducted alongside a questionnaire survey on fatalism, perceived police enforcement, risk-taking personality, and perceived usefulness of helmets. For the observation and questionnaire survey, seven rural and urban sites were selected from all seven provinces of Nepal, representing varied populations, road environments, and elevations. The observation of the helmet use behavior of 2548 motorcycle riders revealed an alarming picture of helmet use in Nepal. While more than 98% of observed motorcycle drivers in Nepal used a motorcycle helmet, less than 1% of observed passengers did so. Interviews of 220 riders show that the absence of a fine for helmet non-use by passengers is accompanied by an unawareness of the traffic law, where only 11.8% of respondents knew about the mandatory helmet use law for passengers. Unhelmeted riders had a significantly higher attribution of road related crashes to fate, compared with riders that used a helmet. Results of this study can serve as an evidence base for revisions of Nepal’s Vehicle and Transportation Management Act in regard to traffic rule enforcement and fines. They further show the global importance of comprehensive regulation on safety related behaviors of road users. The feasibility of more comprehensive enforcement is discussed against the background of helmet availability for passengers.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedeng
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.trf.2021.04.005eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/53862
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsterms-of-use
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectMotorcycle, Helmet use, Mandatory helmet law, Police enforcement, Naturalistic observation, Nepaleng
dc.subject.ddc004eng
dc.titleDisparity of motorcycle helmet use in Nepal : Weak law enforcement or riders' reluctance?eng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEeng
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Siebert2021Dispa-53862,
  year={2021},
  doi={10.1016/j.trf.2021.04.005},
  title={Disparity of motorcycle helmet use in Nepal : Weak law enforcement or riders' reluctance?},
  volume={79},
  issn={1369-8478},
  journal={Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour},
  pages={72--83},
  author={Siebert, Felix Wilhelm and Hellmann, Lennart and Pant, Puspa Raj and Lin, Hanhe and Trimpop, Rüdiger}
}
kops.citation.iso690SIEBERT, Felix Wilhelm, Lennart HELLMANN, Puspa Raj PANT, Hanhe LIN, Rüdiger TRIMPOP, 2021. Disparity of motorcycle helmet use in Nepal : Weak law enforcement or riders' reluctance?. In: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Elsevier. 2021, 79, pp. 72-83. ISSN 1369-8478. eISSN 1873-5517. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.04.005deu
kops.citation.iso690SIEBERT, Felix Wilhelm, Lennart HELLMANN, Puspa Raj PANT, Hanhe LIN, Rüdiger TRIMPOP, 2021. Disparity of motorcycle helmet use in Nepal : Weak law enforcement or riders' reluctance?. In: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Elsevier. 2021, 79, pp. 72-83. ISSN 1369-8478. eISSN 1873-5517. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.04.005eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/53862">
    <dc:creator>Trimpop, Rüdiger</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>Disparity of motorcycle helmet use in Nepal : Weak law enforcement or riders' reluctance?</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Trimpop, Rüdiger</dc:contributor>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/53862"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/>
    <dc:contributor>Hellmann, Lennart</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:creator>Hellmann, Lennart</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Like many low- and middle-income countries, Nepal is experiencing a massive motorization, predominantly from increased use of motorcycles which is driving a surge in road-related injuries and fatalities. Motorcycles and their riders have been identified as a focal point for road traffic injury prevention measures. While helmet use is mandatory for both motorcycle drivers and passengers, fines for helmet non-use are only levied on drivers, not on passengers, and it is unclear how this unequal enforcement translates to helmet use rates in Nepal. Hence, a video-based observation on motorcyclists’ helmet use was conducted alongside a questionnaire survey on fatalism, perceived police enforcement, risk-taking personality, and perceived usefulness of helmets. For the observation and questionnaire survey, seven rural and urban sites were selected from all seven provinces of Nepal, representing varied populations, road environments, and elevations. The observation of the helmet use behavior of 2548 motorcycle riders revealed an alarming picture of helmet use in Nepal. While more than 98% of observed motorcycle drivers in Nepal used a motorcycle helmet, less than 1% of observed passengers did so. Interviews of 220 riders show that the absence of a fine for helmet non-use by passengers is accompanied by an unawareness of the traffic law, where only 11.8% of respondents knew about the mandatory helmet use law for passengers. Unhelmeted riders had a significantly higher attribution of road related crashes to fate, compared with riders that used a helmet. Results of this study can serve as an evidence base for revisions of Nepal’s Vehicle and Transportation Management Act in regard to traffic rule enforcement and fines. They further show the global importance of comprehensive regulation on safety related behaviors of road users. The feasibility of more comprehensive enforcement is discussed against the background of helmet availability for passengers.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-06-01T07:24:52Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Pant, Puspa Raj</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:creator>Pant, Puspa Raj</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Siebert, Felix Wilhelm</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-06-01T07:24:52Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Lin, Hanhe</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Siebert, Felix Wilhelm</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Lin, Hanhe</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedtrueeng
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.sourcefieldTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Elsevier. 2021, <b>79</b>, pp. 72-83. ISSN 1369-8478. eISSN 1873-5517. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.04.005deu
kops.sourcefield.plainTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Elsevier. 2021, 79, pp. 72-83. ISSN 1369-8478. eISSN 1873-5517. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.04.005deu
kops.sourcefield.plainTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Elsevier. 2021, 79, pp. 72-83. ISSN 1369-8478. eISSN 1873-5517. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.04.005eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication72057485-5f84-41aa-b6cb-8d616362e6a8
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery72057485-5f84-41aa-b6cb-8d616362e6a8
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage72eng
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage83eng
source.bibliographicInfo.volume79eng
source.identifier.eissn1873-5517eng
source.identifier.issn1369-8478eng
source.periodicalTitleTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavioureng
source.publisherElseviereng

Dateien