Publikation: Deliberative Abilities and Influence in a Transnational Deliberative Poll (EuroPolis)
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
This article investigates the deliberative abilities of ordinary citizens in the context of ‘EuroPolis’, a transnational deliberative poll. Drawing upon a philosophically grounded instrument, an updated version of the Discourse Quality Index (DQI), it explores how capable European citizens are of meeting deliberative ideals; whether socio-economic, cultural and psychological biases affect the ability to deliberate; and whether opinion change results from the exchange of arguments. On the positive side, EuroPolis shows that the ideal deliberator scoring high on all deliberative standards does actually exist, and that participants change their opinions more often when rational justification is used in the discussions. On the negative side, deliberative abilities are unequally distributed: in particular, working-class members are less likely to contribute to a high standard of deliberation.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
GERBER, Marlène, André BÄCHTIGER, Susumu SHIKANO, Simon REBER, Samuel ROHR, 2018. Deliberative Abilities and Influence in a Transnational Deliberative Poll (EuroPolis). In: British Journal of Political Science. 2018, 48(04), pp. 1093-1118. ISSN 0007-1234. eISSN 1469-2112. Available under: doi: 10.1017/S0007123416000144BibTex
@article{Gerber2018-10Delib-37303, year={2018}, doi={10.1017/S0007123416000144}, title={Deliberative Abilities and Influence in a Transnational Deliberative Poll (EuroPolis)}, number={04}, volume={48}, issn={0007-1234}, journal={British Journal of Political Science}, pages={1093--1118}, author={Gerber, Marlène and Bächtiger, André and Shikano, Susumu and Reber, Simon and Rohr, Samuel} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/37303"> <dc:contributor>Gerber, Marlène</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Bächtiger, André</dc:contributor> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-02-10T09:31:18Z</dc:date> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dc:creator>Reber, Simon</dc:creator> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dc:contributor>Rohr, Samuel</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Gerber, Marlène</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2018-10</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/37303/1/Gerber_2-1w4viesa5md6u2.pdf"/> <dc:creator>Shikano, Susumu</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Shikano, Susumu</dc:contributor> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This article investigates the deliberative abilities of ordinary citizens in the context of ‘EuroPolis’, a transnational deliberative poll. Drawing upon a philosophically grounded instrument, an updated version of the Discourse Quality Index (DQI), it explores how capable European citizens are of meeting deliberative ideals; whether socio-economic, cultural and psychological biases affect the ability to deliberate; and whether opinion change results from the exchange of arguments. On the positive side, EuroPolis shows that the ideal deliberator scoring high on all deliberative standards does actually exist, and that participants change their opinions more often when rational justification is used in the discussions. On the negative side, deliberative abilities are unequally distributed: in particular, working-class members are less likely to contribute to a high standard of deliberation.</dcterms:abstract> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/37303"/> <dc:creator>Bächtiger, André</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/37303/1/Gerber_2-1w4viesa5md6u2.pdf"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-02-10T09:31:18Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:title>Deliberative Abilities and Influence in a Transnational Deliberative Poll (EuroPolis)</dcterms:title> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:creator>Rohr, Samuel</dc:creator> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Reber, Simon</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>