Publikation: „Un champ de bataille on ne peut plus réel“ : zur Referentialität von Distanz und Nähe in 14 von Jean Echenoz
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
This paper addresses the production of referentiality in historical fiction. It analyses Jean Echenoz’WorldWar I novel 14 (2012), by identifying textual patterns that generate effects of distance and proximity. These effects concern the metatextual dialogue the novel holds with conventional ways of representing this war, and they also relate to the actual historical past evoked by the novel. In this respect 14 performs a notable inversion. Historical fiction usually produces effects of distance in order to convey historical explanation and achieves historical concreteness by effects of proximity, whereas Echenoz endeavours to provide certain aspects of the war with explicative coherence, registering the material world with great concreteness. In many passages, on the other hand, his minimalist writing produces an ironic distance, which makes experiences of contingency aesthetically evident.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
SCHWARZE, Michael, 2017. „Un champ de bataille on ne peut plus réel“ : zur Referentialität von Distanz und Nähe in 14 von Jean Echenoz. In: Romanistisches Jahrbuch. 2017, 68(1), pp. 232-256. ISSN 0080-3898. eISSN 1613-0413. Available under: doi: 10.1515/roja-2017-0009BibTex
@article{Schwarze2017-10-26champ-44297, year={2017}, doi={10.1515/roja-2017-0009}, title={„Un champ de bataille on ne peut plus réel“ : zur Referentialität von Distanz und Nähe in 14 von Jean Echenoz}, number={1}, volume={68}, issn={0080-3898}, journal={Romanistisches Jahrbuch}, pages={232--256}, author={Schwarze, Michael} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44297"> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:creator>Schwarze, Michael</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:contributor>Schwarze, Michael</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/38"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/38"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-12-13T10:10:30Z</dc:date> <dcterms:title>„Un champ de bataille on ne peut plus réel“ : zur Referentialität von Distanz und Nähe in 14 von Jean Echenoz</dcterms:title> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/44297/1/Schwarze_2-1x9t72vr4fhvd3.pdf"/> <dcterms:issued>2017-10-26</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="deu">This paper addresses the production of referentiality in historical fiction. It analyses Jean Echenoz’WorldWar I novel 14 (2012), by identifying textual patterns that generate effects of distance and proximity. These effects concern the metatextual dialogue the novel holds with conventional ways of representing this war, and they also relate to the actual historical past evoked by the novel. In this respect 14 performs a notable inversion. Historical fiction usually produces effects of distance in order to convey historical explanation and achieves historical concreteness by effects of proximity, whereas Echenoz endeavours to provide certain aspects of the war with explicative coherence, registering the material world with great concreteness. In many passages, on the other hand, his minimalist writing produces an ironic distance, which makes experiences of contingency aesthetically evident.</dcterms:abstract> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:language>deu</dc:language> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/44297"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/44297/1/Schwarze_2-1x9t72vr4fhvd3.pdf"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-12-13T10:10:30Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>