Publikation: On the Origins of Old Evidence
Lade...
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2020
Autor:innen
Hartmann, Stephan
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Australasian Journal of Philosophy. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 2020, 98(3), pp. 481-494. ISSN 0004-8402. eISSN 1471-6828. Available under: doi: 10.1080/00048402.2019.1658210
Zusammenfassung
The problem of old evidence, first described by Glymour [1980], is still widely regarded as one of the most pressing foundational challenges to the Bayesian account of scientific reasoning. Many solutions have been proposed, but all of them have drawbacks and none is considered to be definitive. Here, we introduce and defend a new kind of solution, according to which hypotheses are confirmed when we become more confident that they provide the only way of accounting for the known evidence.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
Bayesianism, philosophy of science, epistemology, probability, old evidence
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
EVA, Benjamin, Stephan HARTMANN, 2020. On the Origins of Old Evidence. In: Australasian Journal of Philosophy. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 2020, 98(3), pp. 481-494. ISSN 0004-8402. eISSN 1471-6828. Available under: doi: 10.1080/00048402.2019.1658210BibTex
@article{Eva2020Origi-52005, year={2020}, doi={10.1080/00048402.2019.1658210}, title={On the Origins of Old Evidence}, number={3}, volume={98}, issn={0004-8402}, journal={Australasian Journal of Philosophy}, pages={481--494}, author={Eva, Benjamin and Hartmann, Stephan} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52005"> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-12-03T09:30:06Z</dc:date> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:issued>2020</dcterms:issued> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-12-03T09:30:06Z</dcterms:available> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:creator>Hartmann, Stephan</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The problem of old evidence, first described by Glymour [1980], is still widely regarded as one of the most pressing foundational challenges to the Bayesian account of scientific reasoning. Many solutions have been proposed, but all of them have drawbacks and none is considered to be definitive. Here, we introduce and defend a new kind of solution, according to which hypotheses are confirmed when we become more confident that they provide the only way of accounting for the known evidence.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:contributor>Eva, Benjamin</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/52005"/> <dc:contributor>Hartmann, Stephan</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Eva, Benjamin</dc:creator> <dcterms:title>On the Origins of Old Evidence</dcterms:title> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja