When do Women Take the Lead? : Exploring the Intersection Between Gender Equality and Women’s Environmental Political Participation from a Comparative Perspective
| dc.contributor.author | Isaacson, Summer | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-08T11:19:56Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-10-08T11:19:56Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-12-16 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Research has long claimed that women engage less than men in environmental political participation (EPP) (protests, petitions), despite having higher levels of environmental concern and vulnerability. Using the ISSP’s 2020 Environment Module including 28 countries, we argue that higher gender equality and socio-economic development can allow women to voice environmental grievances. Using multi-level models, we examine the effects of gender equality on gender differences in protests, petitions, and boycotts. Offering a more encompassing approach, we distinguish individual from collective, and non-confrontational from confrontational engagement forms. We find that women actually participate more than men, but mainly in individual and non-confrontational EPP forms (petitions, boycotts), and with substantial cross-country variation. Moreover, considering women’s historical barriers from participating in politics, we argue that structural gender inequality remains an important limitation to women’s engagement. Cross-level interactions indicate that especially when in more egalitarian countries, women take the lead in several types of EPP. | |
| dc.description.version | published | deu |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/00207659.2024.2384310 | |
| dc.identifier.ppn | 1914648323 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/70931 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject.ddc | 320 | |
| dc.title | When do Women Take the Lead? : Exploring the Intersection Between Gender Equality and Women’s Environmental Political Participation from a Comparative Perspective | eng |
| dc.type | JOURNAL_ARTICLE | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| kops.citation.bibtex | @article{Isaacson2024-12-16Women-70931,
year={2024},
doi={10.1080/00207659.2024.2384310},
title={When do Women Take the Lead? : Exploring the Intersection Between Gender Equality and Women’s Environmental Political Participation from a Comparative Perspective},
number={5-6},
volume={54},
issn={0020-7659},
journal={International Journal of Sociology},
pages={399--423},
author={Isaacson, Summer}
} | |
| kops.citation.iso690 | ISAACSON, Summer, 2024. When do Women Take the Lead? : Exploring the Intersection Between Gender Equality and Women’s Environmental Political Participation from a Comparative Perspective. In: International Journal of Sociology. Taylor & Francis. 2024, 54(5-6), S. 399-423. ISSN 0020-7659. eISSN 1557-9336. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1080/00207659.2024.2384310 | deu |
| kops.citation.iso690 | ISAACSON, Summer, 2024. When do Women Take the Lead? : Exploring the Intersection Between Gender Equality and Women’s Environmental Political Participation from a Comparative Perspective. In: International Journal of Sociology. Taylor & Francis. 2024, 54(5-6), pp. 399-423. ISSN 0020-7659. eISSN 1557-9336. Available under: doi: 10.1080/00207659.2024.2384310 | eng |
| kops.citation.rdf | <rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/70931">
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-10-08T11:19:56Z</dcterms:available>
<dc:creator>Isaacson, Summer</dc:creator>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dcterms:title>When do Women Take the Lead? : Exploring the Intersection Between Gender Equality and Women’s Environmental Political Participation from a Comparative Perspective</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:issued>2024-12-16</dcterms:issued>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43613"/>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-10-08T11:19:56Z</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Isaacson, Summer</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43613"/>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/70931/1/Isaacson_2-1wcyt3icfvc7z7.pdf"/>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/70931"/>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/70931/1/Isaacson_2-1wcyt3icfvc7z7.pdf"/>
<dcterms:abstract>Research has long claimed that women engage less than men in environmental political participation (EPP) (protests, petitions), despite having higher levels of environmental concern and vulnerability. Using the ISSP’s 2020 Environment Module including 28 countries, we argue that higher gender equality and socio-economic development can allow women to voice environmental grievances. Using multi-level models, we examine the effects of gender equality on gender differences in protests, petitions, and boycotts. Offering a more encompassing approach, we distinguish individual from collective, and non-confrontational from confrontational engagement forms. We find that women actually participate more than men, but mainly in individual and non-confrontational EPP forms (petitions, boycotts), and with substantial cross-country variation. Moreover, considering women’s historical barriers from participating in politics, we argue that structural gender inequality remains an important limitation to women’s engagement. Cross-level interactions indicate that especially when in more egalitarian countries, women take the lead in several types of EPP.</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF> | |
| kops.description.funding | {"first":"dfg","second":"EXC-2035/1 – 390681379"} | |
| kops.description.openAccess | openaccesshybrid | |
| kops.flag.isPeerReviewed | true | |
| kops.flag.knbibliography | true | |
| kops.identifier.nbn | urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-1wcyt3icfvc7z7 | |
| kops.sourcefield | International Journal of Sociology. Taylor & Francis. 2024, <b>54</b>(5-6), S. 399-423. ISSN 0020-7659. eISSN 1557-9336. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1080/00207659.2024.2384310 | deu |
| kops.sourcefield.plain | International Journal of Sociology. Taylor & Francis. 2024, 54(5-6), S. 399-423. ISSN 0020-7659. eISSN 1557-9336. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1080/00207659.2024.2384310 | deu |
| kops.sourcefield.plain | International Journal of Sociology. Taylor & Francis. 2024, 54(5-6), pp. 399-423. ISSN 0020-7659. eISSN 1557-9336. Available under: doi: 10.1080/00207659.2024.2384310 | eng |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 1695f561-d52e-46d2-90fa-86ebbfe81300 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 1695f561-d52e-46d2-90fa-86ebbfe81300 | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage | 399 | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.issue | 5-6 | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.toPage | 423 | |
| source.bibliographicInfo.volume | 54 | |
| source.identifier.eissn | 1557-9336 | |
| source.identifier.issn | 0020-7659 | |
| source.periodicalTitle | International Journal of Sociology | |
| source.publisher | Taylor & Francis | |
| temp.description.funding | {"second":"EXC-2035/1 – 390681379","first":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG – German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy"} |
Dateien
Originalbündel
1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
- Name:
- Isaacson_2-1wcyt3icfvc7z7.pdf
- Größe:
- 1.15 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
