Publikation: 'Governance Fatigue' and Public Mismanagement : the Case for Classic Bureaucracy and Public Values
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
The scholarly discourse about public administration has been shaped in recent decades by an anti-Weberian approach which left many students of the public sector unsatisfied due to its one-sidedness and a resulting distance towards real-world governmental agencies and the way they function. After all, public administration, on the one hand, remains hierarchical, rule-bound and ‘bureaucratic’ in nature as characterized by Max Weber. On the other hand, classic bureaucracy is far less monolithic, hierarchized and rule-bound than its stylized textbook version may make us believe. Bureaucratic governance requires autonomy, discretion, institutional integrity and a sense of responsibility among the leadership. To neglect these classic ingredients of bureaucracy may imply to neglect its classic virtues as well. This chapter illustrates this risk with an empirical case of public mismanagement in Germany that claimed the lives of 21 people.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
SEIBEL, Wolfgang, 2019. 'Governance Fatigue' and Public Mismanagement : the Case for Classic Bureaucracy and Public Values. In: BEHNKE, Nathalie, ed., Jörg BROSCHEK, ed., Jared SONNICKSEN, ed.. Configurations, Dynamics and Mechanisms of Multilevel Governance. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, pp. 61-77. ISBN 978-3-030-05510-3. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-05511-0_4BibTex
@incollection{Seibel2019-02-02Gover-45309, year={2019}, doi={10.1007/978-3-030-05511-0_4}, title={'Governance Fatigue' and Public Mismanagement : the Case for Classic Bureaucracy and Public Values}, isbn={978-3-030-05510-3}, publisher={Palgrave Macmillan}, address={Cham}, booktitle={Configurations, Dynamics and Mechanisms of Multilevel Governance}, pages={61--77}, editor={Behnke, Nathalie and Broschek, Jörg and Sonnicksen, Jared}, author={Seibel, Wolfgang} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45309"> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-03-05T13:55:05Z</dcterms:available> <dc:creator>Seibel, Wolfgang</dc:creator> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:title>'Governance Fatigue' and Public Mismanagement : the Case for Classic Bureaucracy and Public Values</dcterms:title> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The scholarly discourse about public administration has been shaped in recent decades by an anti-Weberian approach which left many students of the public sector unsatisfied due to its one-sidedness and a resulting distance towards real-world governmental agencies and the way they function. After all, public administration, on the one hand, remains hierarchical, rule-bound and ‘bureaucratic’ in nature as characterized by Max Weber. On the other hand, classic bureaucracy is far less monolithic, hierarchized and rule-bound than its stylized textbook version may make us believe. Bureaucratic governance requires autonomy, discretion, institutional integrity and a sense of responsibility among the leadership. To neglect these classic ingredients of bureaucracy may imply to neglect its classic virtues as well. This chapter illustrates this risk with an empirical case of public mismanagement in Germany that claimed the lives of 21 people.</dcterms:abstract> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/45309"/> <dcterms:issued>2019-02-02</dcterms:issued> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-03-05T13:55:05Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Seibel, Wolfgang</dc:contributor> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>