Genetic evidence for prevalence of alloparental care in a socially monogamous biparental cichlid fish, Perissodus microlepis, from Lake Tanganyika supports the “selfish shepherd effect” hypothesis

dc.contributor.authorLee, Hyuk Je
dc.contributor.authorHeim, Valentin
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Axel
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-03T12:27:22Z
dc.date.available2016-05-03T12:27:22Z
dc.date.issued2016-05
dc.description.abstractAlloparental care – care for unrelated young – is rare in animals, and its ecological or evolutionary advantages or, alternative maladaptive nature, remain unclear. We investigate alloparental care in the socially monogamous cichlid fish Perissodus microlepis from Lake Tanganyika that exhibits bi-parental care. In a genetic parentage analysis, we discovered a surprisingly high percentage of alloparental care represented by brood mixing, extra-pair paternity and extra-pair maternity in all broods that we investigated. The percentage of nondescendant juveniles of other parents, i.e., brood mixing, ranged from 5% to 57% (mean = 28%). The distribution of genetic parentage also suggests that this socially monogamous species has, in fact, polygamous mating system. The prevalence of genetically mixed broods can be best explained by two, not mutually exclusive hypotheses on farming-out and fostering behaviors. In the majority of broods, the sizes of the parents’ own (descendant) offspring were significantly larger than those of the adopted (nondescendant) juveniles, supporting the ‘selfish shepherd effect’ hypothesis, i.e., that foster parents preferentially accept unrelated “smaller or not larger” young since this would tend to lower the predation risks for their own larger offspring. There was also a tendency for larger parents particularly mothers, more so than smaller parents, to care predominantly for their own offspring. Larger parents might be better at defending against cuckoldry and having foreign young dumped into their broods through farming-out behavior. This result might argue for maladaptive effects of allopatric care for the foster parents that only larger and possibly more experienced pairs can guard against. It needs to be determined why, apparently, the ability to recognize one's own young has not evolved in this species.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedeng
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ece3.2089eng
dc.identifier.pmid27217943
dc.identifier.ppn470178124
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/33793
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc570eng
dc.titleGenetic evidence for prevalence of alloparental care in a socially monogamous biparental cichlid fish, Perissodus microlepis, from Lake Tanganyika supports the “selfish shepherd effect” hypothesiseng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEeng
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Lee2016-05Genet-33793,
  title={Genetic evidence for prevalence of alloparental care in a socially monogamous biparental cichlid fish, Perissodus microlepis, from Lake Tanganyika supports the “selfish shepherd effect” hypothesis},
  year={2016},
  doi={10.1002/ece3.2089},
  number={9},
  volume={6},
  journal={Ecology and Evolution},
  pages={2843--2853},
  author={Lee, Hyuk Je and Heim, Valentin and Meyer, Axel}
}
kops.citation.iso690LEE, Hyuk Je, Valentin HEIM, Axel MEYER, 2016. Genetic evidence for prevalence of alloparental care in a socially monogamous biparental cichlid fish, Perissodus microlepis, from Lake Tanganyika supports the “selfish shepherd effect” hypothesis. In: Ecology and Evolution. 2016, 6(9), S. 2843-2853. eISSN 2045-7758. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1002/ece3.2089deu
kops.citation.iso690LEE, Hyuk Je, Valentin HEIM, Axel MEYER, 2016. Genetic evidence for prevalence of alloparental care in a socially monogamous biparental cichlid fish, Perissodus microlepis, from Lake Tanganyika supports the “selfish shepherd effect” hypothesis. In: Ecology and Evolution. 2016, 6(9), pp. 2843-2853. eISSN 2045-7758. Available under: doi: 10.1002/ece3.2089eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/33793">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-05-03T12:27:22Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Lee, Hyuk Je</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Alloparental care – care for unrelated young – is rare in animals, and its ecological or evolutionary advantages or, alternative maladaptive nature, remain unclear. We investigate alloparental care in the socially monogamous cichlid fish Perissodus microlepis from Lake Tanganyika that exhibits bi-parental care. In a genetic parentage analysis, we discovered a surprisingly high percentage of alloparental care represented by brood mixing, extra-pair paternity and extra-pair maternity in all broods that we investigated. The percentage of nondescendant juveniles of other parents, i.e., brood mixing, ranged from 5% to 57% (mean = 28%). The distribution of genetic parentage also suggests that this socially monogamous species has, in fact, polygamous mating system. The prevalence of genetically mixed broods can be best explained by two, not mutually exclusive hypotheses on farming-out and fostering behaviors. In the majority of broods, the sizes of the parents’ own (descendant) offspring were significantly larger than those of the adopted (nondescendant) juveniles, supporting the ‘selfish shepherd effect’ hypothesis, i.e., that foster parents preferentially accept unrelated “smaller or not larger” young since this would tend to lower the predation risks for their own larger offspring. There was also a tendency for larger parents particularly mothers, more so than smaller parents, to care predominantly for their own offspring. Larger parents might be better at defending against cuckoldry and having foreign young dumped into their broods through farming-out behavior. This result might argue for maladaptive effects of allopatric care for the foster parents that only larger and possibly more experienced pairs can guard against. It needs to be determined why, apparently, the ability to recognize one's own young has not evolved in this species.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:creator>Meyer, Axel</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-05-03T12:27:22Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Meyer, Axel</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>Genetic evidence for prevalence of alloparental care in a socially monogamous biparental cichlid fish, Perissodus microlepis, from Lake Tanganyika supports the “selfish shepherd effect” hypothesis</dcterms:title>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/33793/1/Lee_0-331433.pdf"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Heim, Valentin</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Lee, Hyuk Je</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/33793/1/Lee_0-331433.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2016-05</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Heim, Valentin</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/33793"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.openAccessopenaccessgold
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-0-331433
kops.sourcefieldEcology and Evolution. 2016, <b>6</b>(9), S. 2843-2853. eISSN 2045-7758. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1002/ece3.2089deu
kops.sourcefield.plainEcology and Evolution. 2016, 6(9), S. 2843-2853. eISSN 2045-7758. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1002/ece3.2089deu
kops.sourcefield.plainEcology and Evolution. 2016, 6(9), pp. 2843-2853. eISSN 2045-7758. Available under: doi: 10.1002/ece3.2089eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationcccaa847-d511-4a8e-af54-a57cb0d54c0f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1cd8fcb1-0ba5-43ef-82ce-80ab5052e664
relation.isAuthorOfPublication77c33793-52cc-44a7-9936-fec7d6e8d15c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverycccaa847-d511-4a8e-af54-a57cb0d54c0f
relation.isDatasetOfPublication6868475a-c90a-4234-b2e4-1d485f8b7595
relation.isDatasetOfPublication.latestForDiscovery6868475a-c90a-4234-b2e4-1d485f8b7595
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage2843
source.bibliographicInfo.issue9
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage2853
source.bibliographicInfo.volume6
source.identifier.eissn2045-7758eng
source.periodicalTitleEcology and Evolutioneng

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Lee_0-331433.pdf
Größe:
212.92 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Beschreibung:
Lee_0-331433.pdf
Lee_0-331433.pdfGröße: 212.92 KBDownloads: 253