Adaptation of the Systematic Review Framework to the Assessment of Toxicological Test Methods : Challenges and Lessons Learned with the Zebrafish Embryotoxicity Test

dc.contributor.authorStephens, Martin L.
dc.contributor.authorAkgün-Ölmez, Sevcan Gül
dc.contributor.authorHoffmann, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorDe Vries, Rob
dc.contributor.authorFlick, Burkhard
dc.contributor.authorHartung, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorLalu, Manoj
dc.contributor.authorMaertens, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorWitters, Hilda
dc.contributor.authorTsaioun, Katya
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-20T13:43:00Z
dc.date.available2020-08-20T13:43:00Z
dc.date.issued2019eng
dc.description.abstractSystematic review methodology is a means of addressing specific questions through structured, consistent, and transparent examinations of the relevant scientific evidence. This methodology has been used to advantage in clinical medicine, and is being adapted for use in other disciplines. While some applications to toxicology have been explored, especially for hazard identification, the present preparatory study is, to our knowledge, the first attempt to adapt it to the assessment of toxicological test methods. As our test case, we chose the zebrafish embryotoxicity test (ZET) for developmental toxicity and its mammalian counterpart, the standard mammalian prenatal development toxicity study, focusing the review on how well the ZET predicts the presence or absence of chemical-induced pre-natal developmental toxicity observed in mammalian studies. An interdisciplinary team prepared a systematic review protocol and adjusted it throughout this piloting phase, where needed. The final protocol was registered and will guide the main study (systematic review), which will execute the protocol to comprehensively answer the review question. The goal of this preparatory study was to translate systematic review methodology to the assessment of toxicological test method performance. Consequently, it focused on the methodological issues encountered, whereas the main study will report substantive findings. These relate to numerous systematic review steps, but primarily to searching and selecting the evidence. Applying the lessons learned to these challenges can improve not only our main study, but may also be helpful to others seeking to use systematic review methodology to compare toxicological test methods. We conclude with a series of recommendations that, if adopted, would help improve the quality of the published literature, and make conducting systematic reviews of toxicological studies faster and easier over time.eng
dc.description.versionpublishedeng
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/toxsci/kfz128eng
dc.identifier.pmid31192353eng
dc.identifier.ppn1733647481
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/50547
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectsystematic review; test method comparison; zebrafish embryotoxicity test; prenatal developmental toxicity; malformations.eng
dc.subject.ddc570eng
dc.titleAdaptation of the Systematic Review Framework to the Assessment of Toxicological Test Methods : Challenges and Lessons Learned with the Zebrafish Embryotoxicity Testeng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEeng
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Stephens2019Adapt-50547,
  year={2019},
  doi={10.1093/toxsci/kfz128},
  title={Adaptation of the Systematic Review Framework to the Assessment of Toxicological Test Methods : Challenges and Lessons Learned with the Zebrafish Embryotoxicity Test},
  number={1},
  volume={171},
  issn={1096-6080},
  journal={Toxicological Sciences},
  pages={56--68},
  author={Stephens, Martin L. and Akgün-Ölmez, Sevcan Gül and Hoffmann, Sebastian and De Vries, Rob and Flick, Burkhard and Hartung, Thomas and Lalu, Manoj and Maertens, Alexandra and Witters, Hilda and Tsaioun, Katya}
}
kops.citation.iso690STEPHENS, Martin L., Sevcan Gül AKGÜN-ÖLMEZ, Sebastian HOFFMANN, Rob DE VRIES, Burkhard FLICK, Thomas HARTUNG, Manoj LALU, Alexandra MAERTENS, Hilda WITTERS, Katya TSAIOUN, 2019. Adaptation of the Systematic Review Framework to the Assessment of Toxicological Test Methods : Challenges and Lessons Learned with the Zebrafish Embryotoxicity Test. In: Toxicological Sciences. Oxford University Press (OUP). 2019, 171(1), pp. 56-68. ISSN 1096-6080. eISSN 1096-0929. Available under: doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfz128deu
kops.citation.iso690STEPHENS, Martin L., Sevcan Gül AKGÜN-ÖLMEZ, Sebastian HOFFMANN, Rob DE VRIES, Burkhard FLICK, Thomas HARTUNG, Manoj LALU, Alexandra MAERTENS, Hilda WITTERS, Katya TSAIOUN, 2019. Adaptation of the Systematic Review Framework to the Assessment of Toxicological Test Methods : Challenges and Lessons Learned with the Zebrafish Embryotoxicity Test. In: Toxicological Sciences. Oxford University Press (OUP). 2019, 171(1), pp. 56-68. ISSN 1096-6080. eISSN 1096-0929. Available under: doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfz128eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/50547">
    <dc:contributor>Witters, Hilda</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>De Vries, Rob</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Witters, Hilda</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Akgün-Ölmez, Sevcan Gül</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Systematic review methodology is a means of addressing specific questions through structured, consistent, and transparent examinations of the relevant scientific evidence. This methodology has been used to advantage in clinical medicine, and is being adapted for use in other disciplines. While some applications to toxicology have been explored, especially for hazard identification, the present preparatory study is, to our knowledge, the first attempt to adapt it to the assessment of toxicological test methods. As our test case, we chose the zebrafish embryotoxicity test (ZET) for developmental toxicity and its mammalian counterpart, the standard mammalian prenatal development toxicity study, focusing the review on how well the ZET predicts the presence or absence of chemical-induced pre-natal developmental toxicity observed in mammalian studies. An interdisciplinary team prepared a systematic review protocol and adjusted it throughout this piloting phase, where needed. The final protocol was registered and will guide the main study (systematic review), which will execute the protocol to comprehensively answer the review question. The goal of this preparatory study was to translate systematic review methodology to the assessment of toxicological test method performance. Consequently, it focused on the methodological issues encountered, whereas the main study will report substantive findings. These relate to numerous systematic review steps, but primarily to searching and selecting the evidence. Applying the lessons learned to these challenges can improve not only our main study, but may also be helpful to others seeking to use systematic review methodology to compare toxicological test methods. We conclude with a series of recommendations that, if adopted, would help improve the quality of the published literature, and make conducting systematic reviews of toxicological studies faster and easier over time.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Akgün-Ölmez, Sevcan Gül</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Tsaioun, Katya</dc:creator>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/50547/1/Stephens_2-1qts1ns6vdazs2.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Hoffmann, Sebastian</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>De Vries, Rob</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Maertens, Alexandra</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Hartung, Thomas</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2019</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Flick, Burkhard</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Flick, Burkhard</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Hoffmann, Sebastian</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/50547/1/Stephens_2-1qts1ns6vdazs2.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Stephens, Martin L.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-08-20T13:43:00Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:contributor>Tsaioun, Katya</dc:contributor>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-08-20T13:43:00Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Maertens, Alexandra</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Lalu, Manoj</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Hartung, Thomas</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/50547"/>
    <dc:contributor>Lalu, Manoj</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Stephens, Martin L.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dcterms:title>Adaptation of the Systematic Review Framework to the Assessment of Toxicological Test Methods : Challenges and Lessons Learned with the Zebrafish Embryotoxicity Test</dcterms:title>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.openAccessopenaccesshybrideng
kops.flag.etalAuthortrueeng
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedtrueeng
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-1qts1ns6vdazs2
kops.sourcefieldToxicological Sciences. Oxford University Press (OUP). 2019, <b>171</b>(1), pp. 56-68. ISSN 1096-6080. eISSN 1096-0929. Available under: doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfz128deu
kops.sourcefield.plainToxicological Sciences. Oxford University Press (OUP). 2019, 171(1), pp. 56-68. ISSN 1096-6080. eISSN 1096-0929. Available under: doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfz128deu
kops.sourcefield.plainToxicological Sciences. Oxford University Press (OUP). 2019, 171(1), pp. 56-68. ISSN 1096-6080. eISSN 1096-0929. Available under: doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfz128eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione18390c6-2c06-4de5-8b32-cf1f65aac921
relation.isAuthorOfPublication36e501e4-b8aa-46a8-9514-4a52792e3f9a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye18390c6-2c06-4de5-8b32-cf1f65aac921
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage56eng
source.bibliographicInfo.issue1eng
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage68eng
source.bibliographicInfo.volume171eng
source.identifier.eissn1096-0929eng
source.identifier.issn1096-6080eng
source.periodicalTitleToxicological Scienceseng
source.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)eng

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Stephens_2-1qts1ns6vdazs2.pdf
Größe:
286.37 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Beschreibung:
Stephens_2-1qts1ns6vdazs2.pdf
Stephens_2-1qts1ns6vdazs2.pdfGröße: 286.37 KBDownloads: 194