Publikation:

Different Order, Different Results? : The Effects of Dimension Order in Factorial Survey Experiments

Vorschaubild

Dateien

Dueval_2-1obeo2iev1nn43.pdf
Dueval_2-1obeo2iev1nn43.pdfGröße: 348.39 KBDownloads: 433

Datum

2020

Autor:innen

Düval, Sabine

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-1obeo2iev1nn43
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X19886827
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Link zur Lizenz
Urheberrechtlich geschützt

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green

Sammlungen

Soziologie: Publikationen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Field Methods. Sage Publications. 2020, 32(1), pp. 23-37. ISSN 1525-822X. eISSN 1552-3969. Available under: doi: 10.1177/1525822X19886827

Zusammenfassung

Factorial surveys are widely used in the social sciences to measure respondents’ attitudes, beliefs, or behavioral intentions. In such surveys, respondents evaluate short descriptions of hypothetical situations, persons, or objects that vary across several dimensions. An important prerequisite of the method’s validity is that respondents are able to deal with the highly complex task created by the need to consider several variable dimensions within one coherent judgment. We analyze the effects of the order in which dimensions are presented in running text vignettes. An experimental setup with four order treatments was randomly allocated to 787 respondents (based on a random sample of register data), yielding 3,119 vignette evaluations. The analyses compare respondent groups across age, education, and response speed. Overall, there is no strong evidence for order effects. However, we find a slight tendency for fast responders to be more prone to recency effects.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie

Schlagwörter

Factorial survey experiments

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690DÜVAL, Sabine, Thomas HINZ, 2020. Different Order, Different Results? : The Effects of Dimension Order in Factorial Survey Experiments. In: Field Methods. Sage Publications. 2020, 32(1), pp. 23-37. ISSN 1525-822X. eISSN 1552-3969. Available under: doi: 10.1177/1525822X19886827
BibTex
@article{Duval2020-02Diffe-47609,
  year={2020},
  doi={10.1177/1525822X19886827},
  title={Different Order, Different Results? : The Effects of Dimension Order in Factorial Survey Experiments},
  number={1},
  volume={32},
  issn={1525-822X},
  journal={Field Methods},
  pages={23--37},
  author={Düval, Sabine and Hinz, Thomas}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/47609">
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-11-25T09:51:37Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Hinz, Thomas</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-11-25T09:51:37Z</dc:date>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/47609"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/47609/1/Dueval_2-1obeo2iev1nn43.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2020-02</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Düval, Sabine</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/47609/1/Dueval_2-1obeo2iev1nn43.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Düval, Sabine</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Factorial surveys are widely used in the social sciences to measure respondents’ attitudes, beliefs, or behavioral intentions. In such surveys, respondents evaluate short descriptions of hypothetical situations, persons, or objects that vary across several dimensions. An important prerequisite of the method’s validity is that respondents are able to deal with the highly complex task created by the need to consider several variable dimensions within one coherent judgment. We analyze the effects of the order in which dimensions are presented in running text vignettes. An experimental setup with four order treatments was randomly allocated to 787 respondents (based on a random sample of register data), yielding 3,119 vignette evaluations. The analyses compare respondent groups across age, education, and response speed. Overall, there is no strong evidence for order effects. However, we find a slight tendency for fast responders to be more prone to recency effects.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Hinz, Thomas</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:title>Different Order, Different Results? : The Effects of Dimension Order in Factorial Survey Experiments</dcterms:title>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen