Decision- and feedback-related brain potentials reveal risk processing mechanisms in patients with alcohol use disorder

dc.contributor.authorSehrig, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorWeiss, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Gregory A.
dc.contributor.authorRockstroh, Brigitte
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-19T11:01:52Z
dc.date.available2019-07-19T11:01:52Z
dc.date.issued2019eng
dc.description.abstractIndividuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) are aware of the risks of alcohol abuse yet continue risky drinking. Research indicates that dysfunctional decision processes and trait variables such as impulsivity contribute to this awareness‐behavior discrepancy. The present study focused on decision‐related versus feedback‐related processes as potential contributors to decision making in AUD by examining the relationship between decision choices and decision‐ and feedback‐related ERP phenomena in the balloon analogue risk task (BART). N = 39 AUD and n = 35 healthy comparison participants (HC) performed the BART modified for EEG assessment. In each of 100 runs, participants made a series of choices about whether to pump up a virtual balloon, which popped pseudorandomly, ending the run. Alternatively, participants ended the run by pressing a “cash‐out” button. Each pump not producing a pop provided .05 €; popping resulted in loss of the run’s accumulated gain. Groups made similar choices, though AUD responded more slowly. The decision P3 200‒400 ms after decision prompt (balloon) was larger in AUD than in HC, and decision P3 enhancement on high‐risk trials predicted choices to pump. Feedback‐related negativity (FRN) after loss (relative to cash out) feedback was smaller in AUD than in HC, suggesting indifference to negative feedback. In AUD, high impulsivity was associated with risk‐modulated decision P3 but not FRN. Results indicate atypical decision‐ and feedback‐related processes that could contribute to difficulties in engaging with daily challenges effectively.
dc.description.versionpublishedde
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/psyp.13450eng
dc.identifier.ppn1679251856
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/46467
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectalcohol use disorder, decision risk, ERP P3, FRN, outcome feedback
dc.subject.ddc150eng
dc.titleDecision- and feedback-related brain potentials reveal risk processing mechanisms in patients with alcohol use disordereng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEde
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Sehrig2019Decis-46467,
  year={2019},
  doi={10.1111/psyp.13450},
  title={Decision- and feedback-related brain potentials reveal risk processing mechanisms in patients with alcohol use disorder},
  number={12},
  volume={56},
  issn={0048-5772},
  journal={Psychophysiology},
  author={Sehrig, Sarah and Weiss, Andreas and Miller, Gregory A. and Rockstroh, Brigitte},
  note={Article Number: e13450}
}
kops.citation.iso690SEHRIG, Sarah, Andreas WEISS, Gregory A. MILLER, Brigitte ROCKSTROH, 2019. Decision- and feedback-related brain potentials reveal risk processing mechanisms in patients with alcohol use disorder. In: Psychophysiology. 2019, 56(12), e13450. ISSN 0048-5772. eISSN 1469-8986. Available under: doi: 10.1111/psyp.13450deu
kops.citation.iso690SEHRIG, Sarah, Andreas WEISS, Gregory A. MILLER, Brigitte ROCKSTROH, 2019. Decision- and feedback-related brain potentials reveal risk processing mechanisms in patients with alcohol use disorder. In: Psychophysiology. 2019, 56(12), e13450. ISSN 0048-5772. eISSN 1469-8986. Available under: doi: 10.1111/psyp.13450eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46467">
    <dc:creator>Weiss, Andreas</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Miller, Gregory A.</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Weiss, Andreas</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Sehrig, Sarah</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/46467"/>
    <dcterms:abstract>Individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) are aware of the risks of alcohol abuse&#xD;
yet continue risky drinking. Research indicates that dysfunctional decision processes&#xD;
and trait variables such as impulsivity contribute to this awareness‐behavior&#xD;
discrepancy. The present study focused on decision‐related versus feedback‐related&#xD;
processes as potential contributors to decision making in AUD by examining the&#xD;
relationship between decision choices and decision‐ and feedback‐related ERP phenomena&#xD;
in the balloon analogue risk task (BART). N = 39 AUD and n = 35 healthy&#xD;
comparison participants (HC) performed the BART modified for EEG assessment.&#xD;
In each of 100 runs, participants made a series of choices about whether to pump&#xD;
up a virtual balloon, which popped pseudorandomly, ending the run. Alternatively,&#xD;
participants ended the run by pressing a “cash‐out” button. Each pump not producing&#xD;
a pop provided .05 €; popping resulted in loss of the run’s accumulated gain.&#xD;
Groups made similar choices, though AUD responded more slowly. The decision P3&#xD;
200‒400 ms after decision prompt (balloon) was larger in AUD than in HC, and decision&#xD;
P3 enhancement on high‐risk trials predicted choices to pump. Feedback‐related&#xD;
negativity (FRN) after loss (relative to cash out) feedback was smaller in AUD than&#xD;
in HC, suggesting indifference to negative feedback. In AUD, high impulsivity was&#xD;
associated with risk‐modulated decision P3 but not FRN. Results indicate atypical&#xD;
decision‐ and feedback‐related processes that could contribute to difficulties in engaging&#xD;
with daily challenges effectively.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-07-19T11:01:52Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dc:creator>Miller, Gregory A.</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/46467/1/Sehrig_2-1o15ypz4sc4xz3.pdf"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/46467/1/Sehrig_2-1o15ypz4sc4xz3.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2019</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:contributor>Rockstroh, Brigitte</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Rockstroh, Brigitte</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-07-19T11:01:52Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:title>Decision- and feedback-related brain potentials reveal risk processing mechanisms in patients with alcohol use disorder</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Sehrig, Sarah</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.openAccessopenaccesshybrideng
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedtrueeng
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-1o15ypz4sc4xz3
kops.sourcefieldPsychophysiology. 2019, <b>56</b>(12), e13450. ISSN 0048-5772. eISSN 1469-8986. Available under: doi: 10.1111/psyp.13450deu
kops.sourcefield.plainPsychophysiology. 2019, 56(12), e13450. ISSN 0048-5772. eISSN 1469-8986. Available under: doi: 10.1111/psyp.13450deu
kops.sourcefield.plainPsychophysiology. 2019, 56(12), e13450. ISSN 0048-5772. eISSN 1469-8986. Available under: doi: 10.1111/psyp.13450eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication92c0a148-4b10-4d29-95d0-a4ec8af03aae
relation.isAuthorOfPublication4049c9d4-2db7-4a6f-b818-1827aeb46557
relation.isAuthorOfPublication76946d64-aa0b-4380-88ac-3f8d9e64fb0e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery92c0a148-4b10-4d29-95d0-a4ec8af03aae
source.bibliographicInfo.articleNumbere13450
source.bibliographicInfo.issue12
source.bibliographicInfo.volume56
source.identifier.eissn1469-8986eng
source.identifier.issn0048-5772eng
source.periodicalTitlePsychophysiologyeng

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Sehrig_2-1o15ypz4sc4xz3.pdf
Größe:
1.03 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Beschreibung:
Sehrig_2-1o15ypz4sc4xz3.pdf
Sehrig_2-1o15ypz4sc4xz3.pdfGröße: 1.03 MBDownloads: 270