Motor learning in golf : a systematic review

dc.contributor.authorBarzyk, Philipp
dc.contributor.authorGruber, Markus
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-20T08:27:41Z
dc.date.available2024-03-20T08:27:41Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractGolf is a sport that consists of complex movement skills that need to be executed with utmost precision. Consequently, motor skill learning plays a crucial role in golf, and large numbers of studies address various methods of motor learning. In the present review, we give a systematic overview of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on motor learning of golf-specific motor skills. Three electronic databases were searched for RCTs looking at the effect of at least one learning method on performance in a golf-specific motor task. We grouped the studies depending on the learning strategies “cognitive training”, “practice scheduling”, “augmented feedback”, “implicit and explicit learning” and “focus of attention”. Fifty-two RCTs met the eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review. Superior methods within their respective strategies were an external focus of attention and increasing contextual interference, as well as errorless learning. For “cognitive training” and “augmented feedback”, no single method can be considered the most favorable. The overall biggest limitations were the lack of statistical power for more than half of the RCTs, and the fact that most studies of the present review investigated simple putting tasks in novices only. Although we have shown superiority of specific learning methods, transferability of the recommendations that can be derived from simple golf tasks in novices to sport-specific tasks in advanced players still has to be demonstrated and require study designs with the intention to provide practical recommendations for coaches and athletes in the sport of golf.
dc.description.versionpublisheddeu
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fspor.2024.1324615
dc.identifier.ppn1883875102
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/69647
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectskill
dc.subjectmotor control
dc.subjectmotor learning
dc.subjectperformance
dc.subjectpractice
dc.subject.ddc796
dc.titleMotor learning in golf : a systematic revieweng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLE
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Barzyk2024Motor-69647,
  year={2024},
  doi={10.3389/fspor.2024.1324615},
  title={Motor learning in golf : a systematic review},
  volume={6},
  journal={Frontiers in Sports and Active Living},
  author={Barzyk, Philipp and Gruber, Markus},
  note={Article Number: 1324615}
}
kops.citation.iso690BARZYK, Philipp, Markus GRUBER, 2024. Motor learning in golf : a systematic review. In: Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. Frontiers. 2024, 6, 1324615. eISSN 2624-9367. Available under: doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1324615deu
kops.citation.iso690BARZYK, Philipp, Markus GRUBER, 2024. Motor learning in golf : a systematic review. In: Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. Frontiers. 2024, 6, 1324615. eISSN 2624-9367. Available under: doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1324615eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/69647">
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/35"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/69647"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-03-20T08:27:41Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Barzyk, Philipp</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Gruber, Markus</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2024</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/69647/1/Barzyk_2-1nvaq803yb6pz4.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/69647/1/Barzyk_2-1nvaq803yb6pz4.pdf"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Gruber, Markus</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/35"/>
    <dc:creator>Barzyk, Philipp</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dcterms:abstract>Golf is a sport that consists of complex movement skills that need to be executed with utmost precision. Consequently, motor skill learning plays a crucial role in golf, and large numbers of studies address various methods of motor learning. In the present review, we give a systematic overview of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on motor learning of golf-specific motor skills. Three electronic databases were searched for RCTs looking at the effect of at least one learning method on performance in a golf-specific motor task. We grouped the studies depending on the learning strategies “cognitive training”, “practice scheduling”, “augmented feedback”, “implicit and explicit learning” and “focus of attention”. Fifty-two RCTs met the eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review. Superior methods within their respective strategies were an external focus of attention and increasing contextual interference, as well as errorless learning. For “cognitive training” and “augmented feedback”, no single method can be considered the most favorable. The overall biggest limitations were the lack of statistical power for more than half of the RCTs, and the fact that most studies of the present review investigated simple putting tasks in novices only. Although we have shown superiority of specific learning methods, transferability of the recommendations that can be derived from simple golf tasks in novices to sport-specific tasks in advanced players still has to be demonstrated and require study designs with the intention to provide practical recommendations for coaches and athletes in the sport of golf.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-03-20T08:27:41Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:title>Motor learning in golf : a systematic review</dcterms:title>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.openAccessopenaccessgold
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedtrue
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-1nvaq803yb6pz4
kops.sourcefieldFrontiers in Sports and Active Living. Frontiers. 2024, <b>6</b>, 1324615. eISSN 2624-9367. Available under: doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1324615deu
kops.sourcefield.plainFrontiers in Sports and Active Living. Frontiers. 2024, 6, 1324615. eISSN 2624-9367. Available under: doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1324615deu
kops.sourcefield.plainFrontiers in Sports and Active Living. Frontiers. 2024, 6, 1324615. eISSN 2624-9367. Available under: doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1324615eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication87f51b50-f3ff-4bc1-a320-23092781a035
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8df1f9cf-eaff-4e97-88ee-1f08100c47fd
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery87f51b50-f3ff-4bc1-a320-23092781a035
source.bibliographicInfo.articleNumber1324615
source.bibliographicInfo.volume6
source.identifier.eissn2624-9367
source.periodicalTitleFrontiers in Sports and Active Living
source.publisherFrontiers

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Barzyk_2-1nvaq803yb6pz4.pdf
Größe:
1.83 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Barzyk_2-1nvaq803yb6pz4.pdf
Barzyk_2-1nvaq803yb6pz4.pdfGröße: 1.83 MBDownloads: 164

Lizenzbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
license.txt
Größe:
3.96 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Beschreibung:
license.txt
license.txtGröße: 3.96 KBDownloads: 0