Publikation: Why the Received Models of Considering Preference Change Must Fail
Lade...
Dateien
Datum
2009
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Sammelband
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
GRÜNE-YANOFF, Till, ed. and others. Preference Change: Approaches from Philosophy, Economics and Psychology. Dordrecht [u.a.]: Springer, 2009, pp. 109-121. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-2593-7
Zusammenfassung
First, the paper discusses the extent to which preference change is a topic of normative rationality; it confirms as one main issue the economists’ search for a rational decision rule in cases in which the agent himself envisages to have changing preferences. Then it introduces so-called global decision models and shows that all the received economic models for dealing with preference change have that shape. The final section states two examples for global decision models, one with extrinsic, belief-induced and one with intrinsic preference change, and interprets each of them in two different scenarios in which different strategies are intuitively reasonable – the point being that global decision models cannot provide sufficient information for stating adequate decision rules. What the missing information might be is at least indicated at the end.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
SPOHN, Wolfgang, 2009. Why the Received Models of Considering Preference Change Must Fail. In: GRÜNE-YANOFF, Till, ed. and others. Preference Change: Approaches from Philosophy, Economics and Psychology. Dordrecht [u.a.]: Springer, 2009, pp. 109-121. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-2593-7BibTex
@incollection{Spohn2009Recei-13628,
year={2009},
doi={10.1007/978-90-481-2593-7},
title={Why the Received Models of Considering Preference Change Must Fail},
publisher={Springer},
address={Dordrecht [u.a.]},
booktitle={Preference Change: Approaches from Philosophy, Economics and Psychology},
pages={109--121},
editor={Grüne-Yanoff, Till},
author={Spohn, Wolfgang}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/13628">
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:title>Why the Received Models of Considering Preference Change Must Fail</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Preference Change: Approaches from Philosophy, Economics and Psychology / Till Grüne-Yanoff ... (Eds.). Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer, 2009, pp. 109-121</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<dcterms:issued>2009</dcterms:issued>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:contributor>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:contributor>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-09-15T09:29:22Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">First, the paper discusses the extent to which preference change is a topic of normative rationality; it confirms as one main issue the economists’ search for a rational decision rule in cases in which the agent himself envisages to have changing preferences. Then it introduces so-called global decision models and shows that all the received economic models for dealing with preference change have that shape. The final section states two examples for global decision models, one with extrinsic, belief-induced and one with intrinsic preference change, and interprets each of them in two different scenarios in which different strategies are intuitively reasonable – the point being that global decision models cannot provide sufficient information for stating adequate decision rules. What the missing information might be is at least indicated at the end.</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:creator>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:creator>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/13628"/>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/13628/2/spohn_why.pdf"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-09-15T09:29:22Z</dcterms:available>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/13628/2/spohn_why.pdf"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
