Der Urteilsbegriff und Wissen aus zweiter Hand in der Ästhetik

dc.contributor.authorBriesen, Jochen
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-30T08:44:25Z
dc.date.available2021-09-30T08:44:25Z
dc.date.issued2021deu
dc.description.abstractAlthough the concept of judgment has been replaced by the concept of belief in many philosophical subdisciplines, it has retained its central role in aesthetics. This paper discusses the following explanation for this: In contrast to the concept of belief, the concept of judgment presupposes conscious and first-personal engagement with the object about which the judgment is being made, and this conscious and first-personal engagement with the object in question plays a more important role in aesthetics than in other domains.deu
dc.description.versionpublishedde
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/dzph-2021-0052deu
dc.identifier.ppn1772143545
dc.identifier.urihttps://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/55094
dc.language.isodeudeu
dc.rightsterms-of-use
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectjugdment; belief; aesthetics; second-hand knowledgedeu
dc.subject.ddc100deu
dc.titleDer Urteilsbegriff und Wissen aus zweiter Hand in der Ästhetikdeu
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEde
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Briesen2021Urtei-55094,
  year={2021},
  doi={10.1515/dzph-2021-0052},
  title={Der Urteilsbegriff und Wissen aus zweiter Hand in der Ästhetik},
  number={4},
  volume={69},
  issn={0012-1045},
  journal={Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie},
  pages={619--632},
  author={Briesen, Jochen}
}
kops.citation.iso690BRIESEN, Jochen, 2021. Der Urteilsbegriff und Wissen aus zweiter Hand in der Ästhetik. In: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie. De Gruyter Akademie. 2021, 69(4), pp. 619-632. ISSN 0012-1045. eISSN 2192-1482. Available under: doi: 10.1515/dzph-2021-0052deu
kops.citation.iso690BRIESEN, Jochen, 2021. Der Urteilsbegriff und Wissen aus zweiter Hand in der Ästhetik. In: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie. De Gruyter Akademie. 2021, 69(4), pp. 619-632. ISSN 0012-1045. eISSN 2192-1482. Available under: doi: 10.1515/dzph-2021-0052eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/55094">
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="deu">Although the concept of judgment has been replaced by the concept of belief in many philosophical subdisciplines, it has retained its central role in aesthetics. This paper discusses the following explanation for this: In contrast to the concept of belief, the concept of judgment presupposes conscious and first-personal engagement with the object about which the judgment is being made, and this conscious and first-personal engagement with the object in question plays a more important role in aesthetics than in other domains.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-09-30T08:44:25Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Briesen, Jochen</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/55094/1/Briesen_2-1lmf6bzv7be4p4.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Briesen, Jochen</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-09-30T08:44:25Z</dc:date>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/55094/1/Briesen_2-1lmf6bzv7be4p4.pdf"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:title>Der Urteilsbegriff und Wissen aus zweiter Hand in der Ästhetik</dcterms:title>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/55094"/>
    <dc:language>deu</dc:language>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.description.openAccessopenaccessgreen
kops.flag.isPeerReviewedtruedeu
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-1lmf6bzv7be4p4
kops.sourcefieldDeutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie. De Gruyter Akademie. 2021, <b>69</b>(4), pp. 619-632. ISSN 0012-1045. eISSN 2192-1482. Available under: doi: 10.1515/dzph-2021-0052deu
kops.sourcefield.plainDeutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie. De Gruyter Akademie. 2021, 69(4), pp. 619-632. ISSN 0012-1045. eISSN 2192-1482. Available under: doi: 10.1515/dzph-2021-0052deu
kops.sourcefield.plainDeutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie. De Gruyter Akademie. 2021, 69(4), pp. 619-632. ISSN 0012-1045. eISSN 2192-1482. Available under: doi: 10.1515/dzph-2021-0052eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5b206d15-20e5-4d39-bf2e-ecb419a264b7
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5b206d15-20e5-4d39-bf2e-ecb419a264b7
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage619deu
source.bibliographicInfo.issue4deu
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage632deu
source.bibliographicInfo.volume69deu
source.identifier.eissn2192-1482deu
source.identifier.issn0012-1045deu
source.periodicalTitleDeutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophiedeu
source.publisherDe Gruyter Akademiedeu

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
Briesen_2-1lmf6bzv7be4p4.pdf
Größe:
586.25 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Beschreibung:
Briesen_2-1lmf6bzv7be4p4.pdf
Briesen_2-1lmf6bzv7be4p4.pdfGröße: 586.25 KBDownloads: 240

Lizenzbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
license.txt
Größe:
3.96 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Beschreibung:
license.txt
license.txtGröße: 3.96 KBDownloads: 0