A note of caution about the "Moral Judgment Test in Physical Education" (MJT-PE)

dc.contributor.authorLind, Georg
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-23T09:24:43Zdeu
dc.date.available2011-03-23T09:24:43Zdeu
dc.date.issued2009deu
dc.description.abstractA new test, the Moral Judgment Test-PE (MJT-PE), has good validity but scores on Competence should be used with great care. These scores will differ from those of the original Moral Judgment Test (MJT) because the single dilemma is targeted to the specific population of interest, physical educators. This reduces the variance in such a way that scores on the new test cannot be compared with or interpreted in the same way as scores on the original MJT. Careful research would be needed to develop norms for the MJT-PE; in the meantime, the two tests should be used together so that the C-scores can be interpreted with confidence.eng
dc.description.versionpublished
dc.identifier.citationPubl. in: Psychological reports, 105 (2009), 3, pp. 886-888deu
dc.identifier.doi10.2466/PR0.105.3.886-888
dc.identifier.urihttp://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/1306
dc.language.isoengdeu
dc.legacy.dateIssued2010deu
dc.rightsterms-of-usedeu
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/deu
dc.subject.ddc150deu
dc.titleA note of caution about the "Moral Judgment Test in Physical Education" (MJT-PE)eng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEdeu
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Lind2009cauti-1306,
  year={2009},
  doi={10.2466/PR0.105.3.886-888},
  title={A note of caution about the "Moral Judgment Test in Physical Education" (MJT-PE)},
  number={3},
  volume={105},
  journal={Psychological reports},
  pages={886--888},
  author={Lind, Georg}
}
kops.citation.iso690LIND, Georg, 2009. A note of caution about the "Moral Judgment Test in Physical Education" (MJT-PE). In: Psychological reports. 2009, 105(3), pp. 886-888. Available under: doi: 10.2466/PR0.105.3.886-888deu
kops.citation.iso690LIND, Georg, 2009. A note of caution about the "Moral Judgment Test in Physical Education" (MJT-PE). In: Psychological reports. 2009, 105(3), pp. 886-888. Available under: doi: 10.2466/PR0.105.3.886-888eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/1306">
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Publ. in: Psychological reports, 105 (2009), 3, pp. 886-888</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/1306"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:title>A note of caution about the "Moral Judgment Test in Physical Education" (MJT-PE)</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Lind, Georg</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2009</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Lind, Georg</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">A new test, the Moral Judgment Test-PE (MJT-PE), has good validity but scores on Competence should be used with great care. These scores will differ from those of the original Moral Judgment Test (MJT) because the single dilemma is targeted to the specific population of interest, physical educators. This reduces the variance in such a way that scores on the new test cannot be compared with or interpreted in the same way as scores on the original MJT. Careful research would be needed to develop norms for the MJT-PE; in the meantime, the two tests should be used together so that the C-scores can be interpreted with confidence.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T09:24:43Z</dcterms:available>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T09:24:43Z</dc:date>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-115191deu
kops.opus.id11519deu
kops.sourcefieldPsychological reports. 2009, <b>105</b>(3), pp. 886-888. Available under: doi: 10.2466/PR0.105.3.886-888deu
kops.sourcefield.plainPsychological reports. 2009, 105(3), pp. 886-888. Available under: doi: 10.2466/PR0.105.3.886-888deu
kops.sourcefield.plainPsychological reports. 2009, 105(3), pp. 886-888. Available under: doi: 10.2466/PR0.105.3.886-888eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8eaed00e-7c2c-4298-8d6c-21d94f26346d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8eaed00e-7c2c-4298-8d6c-21d94f26346d
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage886
source.bibliographicInfo.issue3
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage888
source.bibliographicInfo.volume105
source.periodicalTitlePsychological reports

Dateien