Processing (un-)predictable word stress : ERP evidence from Turkish

dc.contributor.authorDohmas, Ulrikedeu
dc.contributor.authorGenc, Safiyedeu
dc.contributor.authorKnaus, Johannesdeu
dc.contributor.authorWiese, Richarddeu
dc.contributor.authorKabak, Baris
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-16T09:46:55Zdeu
dc.date.available2013-05-16T09:46:55Zdeu
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates the way the predictability of prosodic patterns in a particular language influences the processing of stress information by native speakers of that language. We extend previous findings where speakers of languages with predictable stress had difficulties to process and represent stress information when confronted with a language with distinctive stress and investigate how the co-existence of a predictable stress pattern and exceptions to that regularity within a single language influences prosodic processing. The stress system of Turkish constitutes an instructive test case since it employs predictable stress on the final syllable of a prosodic word (e.g., mısır “corn”) and some exceptional nonfinal stress (e.g., mısır “Egypt”). Results from an event-related potential (ERP) study on stress violations in Turkish trisyllabic words showed asymmetrical ERP responses for different stress violations: Stress violations with final stress produced an N400 effect whereas violations with nonfinal stress produced a P300 effect. The application of the predictable pattern to words with lexical stress led to lexical costs and the application of exceptional stress to words with default stress to effects reflecting the evaluation of this pattern. Although final stress constitutes no alternative pattern for words with exceptional stress, participants have difficulties to judge this pattern as incorrect. In contrast, exceptional stress patterns are detected easily when applied incorrectly to words that normally receive final stress. These findings demonstrate nicely the co-existence of two phonological processing routines in Turkish speakers. Furthermore, the variability of stress patterns does not affect prosodic processing in general but instead leads to differential effects in stress perception. We conclude that stress predictability does not homogenously result in the so-called “stress deafness” effects in stress processing, but that it rather emerges only for the default stress pattern.eng
dc.description.versionpublished
dc.identifier.citationLanguage and Cognitive Processes ; 28 (2013), 3. - S.335-354deu
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01690965.2011.634590deu
dc.identifier.urihttp://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/22973
dc.language.isoengdeu
dc.legacy.dateIssued2013-05-16deu
dc.rightsterms-of-usedeu
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/deu
dc.subject.ddc400deu
dc.titleProcessing (un-)predictable word stress : ERP evidence from Turkisheng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEdeu
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Dohmas2013Proce-22973,
  year={2013},
  doi={10.1080/01690965.2011.634590},
  title={Processing (un-)predictable word stress : ERP evidence from Turkish},
  number={3},
  volume={28},
  issn={0169-0965},
  journal={Language and Cognitive Processes},
  pages={335--354},
  author={Dohmas, Ulrike and Genc, Safiye and Knaus, Johannes and Wiese, Richard and Kabak, Baris}
}
kops.citation.iso690DOHMAS, Ulrike, Safiye GENC, Johannes KNAUS, Richard WIESE, Baris KABAK, 2013. Processing (un-)predictable word stress : ERP evidence from Turkish. In: Language and Cognitive Processes. 2013, 28(3), pp. 335-354. ISSN 0169-0965. eISSN 1464-0732. Available under: doi: 10.1080/01690965.2011.634590deu
kops.citation.iso690DOHMAS, Ulrike, Safiye GENC, Johannes KNAUS, Richard WIESE, Baris KABAK, 2013. Processing (un-)predictable word stress : ERP evidence from Turkish. In: Language and Cognitive Processes. 2013, 28(3), pp. 335-354. ISSN 0169-0965. eISSN 1464-0732. Available under: doi: 10.1080/01690965.2011.634590eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/22973">
    <dc:contributor>Kabak, Baris</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-05-16T09:46:55Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Dohmas, Ulrike</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Language and Cognitive Processes ; 28 (2013), 3. - S.335-354</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:title>Processing (un-)predictable word stress : ERP evidence from Turkish</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This paper investigates the way the predictability of prosodic patterns in a particular language influences the processing of stress information by native speakers of that language. We extend previous findings where speakers of languages with predictable stress had difficulties to process and represent stress information when confronted with a language with distinctive stress and investigate how the co-existence of a predictable stress pattern and exceptions to that regularity within a single language influences prosodic processing. The stress system of Turkish constitutes an instructive test case since it employs predictable stress on the final syllable of a prosodic word (e.g., mısır “corn”) and some exceptional nonfinal stress (e.g., mısır “Egypt”). Results from an event-related potential (ERP) study on stress violations in Turkish trisyllabic words showed asymmetrical ERP responses for different stress violations: Stress violations with final stress produced an N400 effect whereas violations with nonfinal stress produced a P300 effect. The application of the predictable pattern to words with lexical stress led to lexical costs and the application of exceptional stress to words with default stress to effects reflecting the evaluation of this pattern. Although final stress constitutes no alternative pattern for words with exceptional stress, participants have difficulties to judge this pattern as incorrect. In contrast, exceptional stress patterns are detected easily when applied incorrectly to words that normally receive final stress. These findings demonstrate nicely the co-existence of two phonological processing routines in Turkish speakers. Furthermore, the variability of stress patterns does not affect prosodic processing in general but instead leads to differential effects in stress perception. We conclude that stress predictability does not homogenously result in the so-called “stress deafness” effects in stress processing, but that it rather emerges only for the default stress pattern.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Wiese, Richard</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Wiese, Richard</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Kabak, Baris</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Dohmas, Ulrike</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/22973"/>
    <dc:contributor>Genc, Safiye</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Knaus, Johannes</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Knaus, Johannes</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <dc:creator>Genc, Safiye</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-05-16T09:46:55Z</dcterms:available>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.flag.knbibliographyfalse
kops.identifier.nbnurn:nbn:de:bsz:352-229739deu
kops.sourcefieldLanguage and Cognitive Processes. 2013, <b>28</b>(3), pp. 335-354. ISSN 0169-0965. eISSN 1464-0732. Available under: doi: 10.1080/01690965.2011.634590deu
kops.sourcefield.plainLanguage and Cognitive Processes. 2013, 28(3), pp. 335-354. ISSN 0169-0965. eISSN 1464-0732. Available under: doi: 10.1080/01690965.2011.634590deu
kops.sourcefield.plainLanguage and Cognitive Processes. 2013, 28(3), pp. 335-354. ISSN 0169-0965. eISSN 1464-0732. Available under: doi: 10.1080/01690965.2011.634590eng
kops.submitter.emaillaura.liebermann@uni-konstanz.dedeu
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9089153f-4103-4459-9d1e-cc4c7bca9c46
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery9089153f-4103-4459-9d1e-cc4c7bca9c46
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage335
source.bibliographicInfo.issue3
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage354
source.bibliographicInfo.volume28
source.identifier.eissn1464-0732deu
source.identifier.issn0169-0965
source.periodicalTitleLanguage and Cognitive Processes

Dateien

Lizenzbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Name:
license.txt
Größe:
1.92 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Beschreibung:
license.txt
license.txtGröße: 1.92 KBDownloads: 0