Publikation:

How to place non-majoritarian institutions and political actors in a common policy space : Spatial modeling of court–executive interactions

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2024

Autor:innen

Grundmanns, David M.
Gschwend, Thomas

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

The Journal of Politics. University of Chicago Press. ISSN 0022-3816. eISSN 1468-2508. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1086/732980

Zusammenfassung

How can we estimate positions of non-majoritarian institutions in a common policy space?To answer this question, we take highest courts as examples of powerful non-majoritarianinstitutions and develop a new scaling approach to estimate their position in a commonpolicy space with other political actors. In contrast to previous research, our approachneither relies on individual votes of justices nor assumes that justices “inherit” positionsfrom political actors who nominated them. Instead, for each court decision, we use thepositions of political actors expressed in written statements as well as the courts’ decisionoutcome to estimate comparable policy positions. In two applications, we position theGerman Federal Constitutional Court with different German governments and the Eu-ropean Court of Justice with different European governments in common policy spacesand validate them. Finally, we show how our common policy scores can be used to studycourt–executive relations and inter-institutional interactions.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik

Schlagwörter

Spatial modeling, Separation of powers, European Court of Justice, GermanFederal Constitutional Court, Judicial politics

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zitieren

ISO 690ENGST, Benjamin G., David M. GRUNDMANNS, Thomas GSCHWEND, 2024. How to place non-majoritarian institutions and political actors in a common policy space : Spatial modeling of court–executive interactions. In: The Journal of Politics. University of Chicago Press. ISSN 0022-3816. eISSN 1468-2508. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1086/732980
BibTex
@article{Engst2024-09-16place-72912,
  title={How to place non-majoritarian institutions and political actors in a common policy space : Spatial modeling of court–executive interactions},
  year={2024},
  doi={10.1086/732980},
  issn={0022-3816},
  journal={The Journal of Politics},
  author={Engst, Benjamin G. and Grundmanns, David M. and Gschwend, Thomas}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/72912">
    <dcterms:abstract>How can we estimate positions of non-majoritarian institutions in a common policy space?To answer this question, we take highest courts as examples of powerful non-majoritarianinstitutions and develop a new scaling approach to estimate their position in a commonpolicy space with other political actors. In contrast to previous research, our approachneither relies on individual votes of justices nor assumes that justices “inherit” positionsfrom political actors who nominated them. Instead, for each court decision, we use thepositions of political actors expressed in written statements as well as the courts’ decisionoutcome to estimate comparable policy positions. In two applications, we position theGerman Federal Constitutional Court with different German governments and the Eu-ropean Court of Justice with different European governments in common policy spacesand validate them. Finally, we show how our common policy scores can be used to studycourt–executive relations and inter-institutional interactions.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:title>How to place non-majoritarian institutions and political actors in a common policy space : Spatial modeling of court–executive interactions</dcterms:title>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-04-02T10:46:09Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Gschwend, Thomas</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/72912"/>
    <dc:contributor>Grundmanns, David M.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-04-02T10:46:09Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Gschwend, Thomas</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Engst, Benjamin G.</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:creator>Grundmanns, David M.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2024-09-16</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Engst, Benjamin G.</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Online First: Zeitschriftenartikel, die schon vor ihrer Zuordnung zu einem bestimmten Zeitschriftenheft (= Issue) online gestellt werden. Online First-Artikel werden auf der Homepage des Journals in der Verlagsfassung veröffentlicht.
Diese Publikation teilen