Publikation: Neurobiological determinism : human freedom of choice and criminal responsibility
Lade...
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2012
Autor:innen
Laubacher, Arja
Hardegger, Judith
Moskvitin, Konstantin
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2012, 56(2), pp. 174-190. ISSN 0306-624X. eISSN 1552-6933. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0306624X10395474
Zusammenfassung
Several authors have argued that criminal behavior is generally caused by neurobiological deficits. This assumption not only questions the concept of free will and a person’s responsibility for his or her own actions but also the principle of guilt in criminal law. When critically examining the current state of research, it becomes apparent that the results are not sufficient to support the existence of a universally valid neurobiological causality of criminal behavior. Moreover, the assumption of total neurobiological determination of human behavior and the impossibility of individual responsibility are characterized by both faulty empiricism and methodical misconceptions. The principle of relative determinism and the analysis of the offender’s behavior at the time of the offense thus remain the central and cogent approach to the assessment of criminal responsibility.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
URBANIOK, Frank, Arja LAUBACHER, Judith HARDEGGER, Astrid ROSSEGGER, Jérôme ENDRASS, Konstantin MOSKVITIN, 2012. Neurobiological determinism : human freedom of choice and criminal responsibility. In: International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2012, 56(2), pp. 174-190. ISSN 0306-624X. eISSN 1552-6933. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0306624X10395474BibTex
@article{Urbaniok2012-04Neuro-28201,
year={2012},
doi={10.1177/0306624X10395474},
title={Neurobiological determinism : human freedom of choice and criminal responsibility},
number={2},
volume={56},
issn={0306-624X},
journal={International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology},
pages={174--190},
author={Urbaniok, Frank and Laubacher, Arja and Hardegger, Judith and Rossegger, Astrid and Endrass, Jérôme and Moskvitin, Konstantin}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28201">
<dc:contributor>Laubacher, Arja</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Endrass, Jérôme</dc:creator>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Several authors have argued that criminal behavior is generally caused by neurobiological deficits. This assumption not only questions the concept of free will and a person’s responsibility for his or her own actions but also the principle of guilt in criminal law. When critically examining the current state of research, it becomes apparent that the results are not sufficient to support the existence of a universally valid neurobiological causality of criminal behavior. Moreover, the assumption of total neurobiological determination of human behavior and the impossibility of individual responsibility are characterized by both faulty empiricism and methodical misconceptions. The principle of relative determinism and the analysis of the offender’s behavior at the time of the offense thus remain the central and cogent approach to the assessment of criminal responsibility.</dcterms:abstract>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:creator>Laubacher, Arja</dc:creator>
<dcterms:title>Neurobiological determinism : human freedom of choice and criminal responsibility</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:issued>2012-04</dcterms:issued>
<dc:creator>Rossegger, Astrid</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Urbaniok, Frank</dc:contributor>
<dc:contributor>Rossegger, Astrid</dc:contributor>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-06-26T13:47:08Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:bibliographicCitation>International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology ; 56 (2012), 2. - S. 174-190</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
<dc:creator>Urbaniok, Frank</dc:creator>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dc:contributor>Hardegger, Judith</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Moskvitin, Konstantin</dc:creator>
<dc:contributor>Moskvitin, Konstantin</dc:contributor>
<dc:contributor>Endrass, Jérôme</dc:contributor>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/28201"/>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-06-26T13:47:08Z</dcterms:available>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
<dc:creator>Hardegger, Judith</dc:creator>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
